AN EXERCISE IN WORLDMAKING 2009 - ISS
AN EXERCISE IN WORLDMAKING 2009 - ISS
AN EXERCISE IN WORLDMAKING 2009 - ISS
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
9 Tailoring Credit Programs along the Logic of the Poor 107<br />
Table 2<br />
Summary of characteristics of innovative programs for the very poor<br />
MFI<br />
Nisho<br />
Prakalpa<br />
IGVGDP SafeSave QCDP<br />
Targeting<br />
method<br />
Training<br />
Marketing<br />
assistance<br />
Other nonfinancial<br />
services<br />
Innovations<br />
Women in<br />
vulnerable and<br />
remote areas.<br />
Selection of poor<br />
households by<br />
mainstream<br />
program<br />
members and<br />
officials.<br />
Yes, limited to<br />
learning to sign<br />
their names and<br />
discussions<br />
related to health<br />
and education.<br />
Yes, if possible.<br />
Yes, health and<br />
education.<br />
No groups.<br />
Variable loan<br />
term. Consumption<br />
loans.<br />
Leasing, e.g., of<br />
goats.<br />
Source: Hickson (Table 1, 2001: 62)<br />
Very poor<br />
women, selected<br />
by local<br />
government<br />
officials on the<br />
basis of land and<br />
income.<br />
Yes, extensive<br />
training in<br />
poultry<br />
production and<br />
seri-culture.<br />
Yes, e.g., dayold<br />
chicks provided,<br />
to be sold<br />
as layers,<br />
veterinary care<br />
organized.<br />
Yes, health and<br />
education.<br />
Establishment of<br />
a coordinated<br />
program of input<br />
supply and service<br />
provision to<br />
support a poultry<br />
production<br />
chain.<br />
All households<br />
selected in<br />
Dhaka slums.<br />
Basic training<br />
in program<br />
rules and<br />
operation.<br />
No<br />
No<br />
No groups.<br />
Very flexible<br />
loan length,<br />
timing and<br />
repayment<br />
schedule.<br />
Unrestricted<br />
daily savings<br />
deposits and<br />
withdrawals.<br />
No loan-use<br />
restriction.<br />
Selection of poor<br />
villages based<br />
upon vulnerable<br />
geographic location.<br />
Small loan<br />
size and high<br />
interest rate to<br />
deter richer<br />
households.<br />
Basic training in<br />
program rules and<br />
operation.<br />
No<br />
No<br />
Very flexible loan<br />
length, timing,<br />
repayment schedule.<br />
Unrestricted<br />
daily savings<br />
deposits and<br />
withdrawals.<br />
Use of local commissioned<br />
agents.<br />
No loan-use<br />
restriction.<br />
keeping in mind the capacities and interests of the very poor, facilitate<br />
loan repayment and savings build-up.<br />
Hickson makes a strong case by saying that both positions have merit<br />
and that the two approaches are not mutually exclusive. However, practical<br />
experience of the very poor in relation to microcredit so far sup-