08.03.2014 Views

AN EXERCISE IN WORLDMAKING 2009 - ISS

AN EXERCISE IN WORLDMAKING 2009 - ISS

AN EXERCISE IN WORLDMAKING 2009 - ISS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

10 Understanding Informality In A Colombian Context 119<br />

has been to fortify citizen rights regardless of economic or political tendencies,<br />

which have grown over the years, rather intermingled. This is<br />

why the Constitutional court is often controversial but is used in practice<br />

to reinforce the social contract on the part of executives and citizens<br />

alike.<br />

Despite the existence of such institutions, imminent pressures of selfimposed<br />

neoliberal measures quickly opened the economy to international<br />

markets, largely conditioning subsequent labor reforms. This was<br />

done in two steps, first by signing free trade agreements with important<br />

regional players including Chile, Mexico and Venezuela, and second by<br />

opening the capital account through exchange rate policies and direct<br />

foreign investment (Florez, 2002: 6). Expanding trade and creating formal<br />

linkages with other countries propelled the integration of Colombia<br />

in the international economy, placing its need for competitiveness as a<br />

central marker in labor reforms. In concrete terms this has meant that<br />

flexibility has been achieved “by facilitating temporary contracts, facilitating<br />

firing of workers with more than 10 years of experience in the firm<br />

but introducing a higher ‘indemnization’ instead” (Florez, 2002: 4). While<br />

firing workers has become easier in order to reallocate workers in productive<br />

and competitive industries, the price of hiring workers on the<br />

other hand has increased significantly since 1993, due to the creation of<br />

Law 100 that extends a general system of social security in health based<br />

on employment and income status including public and private salaried<br />

employees, low income or self-employed individuals (Florez, 2002: 5).<br />

The concrete results are two-fold; on one hand employers who used<br />

to contribute 12.5 percent to insure their employees now must disburse<br />

25.5 percent, meaning that the value of hiring formal workers has significantly<br />

increased, presenting a liability to employers and changing the nature<br />

of employer-employee relationships (Florez, 2002: 6). The second<br />

result is that self-employed individuals who want to register to enjoy<br />

these social security benefits must spend 25.5 percent of their personal<br />

income as a contribution to these funds, again reducing the incentive of<br />

personal enterprise owners to legally register below this framework.<br />

While these social security schemes were intended to expand access to<br />

health benefits regardless of wealth or employment status, they have<br />

nonetheless created disincentives towards formal employment relation:<br />

labor can be easily retrenched, incentives to hire workers on a formal<br />

basis are reduced, and the incentive of small business owners to register

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!