08.03.2014 Views

AN EXERCISE IN WORLDMAKING 2009 - ISS

AN EXERCISE IN WORLDMAKING 2009 - ISS

AN EXERCISE IN WORLDMAKING 2009 - ISS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

66 MEGH<strong>AN</strong> MICHELLE COOPER<br />

or political realm and the claims that individuals have a right to within a<br />

system (Dagnino 2008b: 29). In this way, citizenship can be seen as a<br />

prominent notion as well as “a crucial weapon not only in the struggle<br />

against social and economic exclusion and inequality but also in the<br />

broadening of dominant conceptions of politics” (Dagnino 2008a: 63). A<br />

relevant example can be seen through the progressive and diverse political<br />

agenda of the Anti-Privatisation Forum (APF) of South Africa.<br />

The unifying theme of the APF has essentially been against the privatization<br />

of basic community and worker needs, claiming the failure of<br />

state privatization policies not only as inefficient but also as ideologically<br />

polarizing the country (Ballard et al. 2006: 402). A movement centred on<br />

class-based ideologies, the APF is often described as anti-neoliberal, anticapital,<br />

anti-GEAR, anti-globalization, pro-poor, pro-human rights and<br />

socialist (Ballard et al. 2005: 623). Due to prevailing influences from the<br />

political right in promoting the reduction of state based capacity through<br />

privatization and the deregulation of labour, etc., many movements have<br />

been actively opposing this reorganization (Roche 2002: 74). Moreover,<br />

the context and way in which the APF operate are in direct opposition to<br />

the outcomes and nature of a capitalist society. The very claims and efforts<br />

of the APF clearly oppose their economic and structural context,<br />

placing citizenship as a key reference for imaging a new democratic<br />

arena. By opposing state economic restructuring the actions of the APF<br />

can be considered as “the survivalist responses of poor and marginalized<br />

people who have had no alternative in the face of unemployment and a<br />

retreating state that refuses to meet its socio-economic obligations to its<br />

citizenry” (Ballard et al. 2006: 402). The activities and claims of the APF<br />

suggest a fundamental reorganization of the way the state operates and<br />

who is included and participates; thus, ultimately, the APF influences the<br />

nature of the democratic arena in post-apartheid South Africa. This<br />

process becomes especially conflictual in the relatively new democratic<br />

state, where many actors have emerged with different opinions on state<br />

transition and consolidation.<br />

<strong>IN</strong>CLUSIVITY<br />

As previously stated, reconceptualizing the democratic arena involves<br />

fundamentally changing the notion of who should be included in democratic<br />

processes, considering pluralism as crucial to the many identities<br />

within a nation state. The concept of inclusive citizenship addresses this

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!