08.03.2014 Views

AN EXERCISE IN WORLDMAKING 2009 - ISS

AN EXERCISE IN WORLDMAKING 2009 - ISS

AN EXERCISE IN WORLDMAKING 2009 - ISS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

132 TISKA YUMEIDA<br />

Source: Prichet, Lant (1995)<br />

Lack of convergence and increasing international inequality has begun<br />

to show the spirit of the North-South trade literatures, specifically the<br />

relationship between primary production and growth. The North is the<br />

manufacturing center and the South is the primary product center issued<br />

by Ronald Findlay (DATE), de-industrialization model by Paul Krugman<br />

(DATE), and The North is an innovator and the South is an imitator by<br />

David Dollar (DATE) will explain the inequality of per capita incomes<br />

occurred in the world. Obviously, this is not a case of permanent disadvantage<br />

for the South, but it is a model of permanent asymmetry between<br />

the North and the South. Thus, while the role of each region in<br />

the world economy changes; there is always a “South”. One of the major<br />

issues is the relationship between the monopoly of the North’s power in<br />

trade and movements in terms of trade. The famous Prebisch-Singer hypothesis<br />

has it that the secular deterioration in terms of trade for the developing<br />

countries is due to the the monopoly of the North’s power in<br />

trade. We can see from the implication of trade liberalization agreement<br />

by Northern (developed) countries. Trade liberalization agreements issue<br />

free access to other countries’ market, the South opens its markets for<br />

the North’s products, however at the same time, the North builds a barrier<br />

for the South’s products. Other arguments why there is non-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!