- Page 1 and 2: A proteome wide approach to underst
- Page 3 and 4: I also want to mention the efforts
- Page 5 and 6: Dedication To my father Haji Sher A
- Page 7 and 8: Table of Contents 1. Introduction .
- Page 9: 3.3.2.2. Protein distributions on 2
- Page 13 and 14: Chapter 1 cell proteome to facilita
- Page 15 and 16: Chapter 1 proteins. It is this diff
- Page 17 and 18: Chapter 1 Salt conc. decreasing (Gr
- Page 19 and 20: Chapter 1 The ions at the start of
- Page 21 and 22: Chapter 1 exposure of hydrophobic r
- Page 23 and 24: Chapter 1 based on the surface hydr
- Page 25 and 26: Chapter 1 1.5. Analysis of the yeas
- Page 27 and 28: Chapter 1 molecular weight impuriti
- Page 29 and 30: Chapter 1 followed by its introduct
- Page 31 and 32: Chapter 1 protein towards purificat
- Page 33 and 34: Chapter 2 EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH
- Page 35 and 36: Chapter 2 Yeast cell proteome and c
- Page 37 and 38: Chapter 2 ligands (Toyopearl-Hexyl,
- Page 39 and 40: Chapter 2 number of spots was count
- Page 41 and 42: Chapter 2 (http://www.matrixscience
- Page 43 and 44: Chapter 3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
- Page 45 and 46: Chapter 3 to the retention behavior
- Page 47 and 48: Chapter 3 investigate the hydrophob
- Page 49 and 50: Chapter 3 the interior of the prote
- Page 51 and 52: Chapter 3 A B C Figure 9: The cryst
- Page 53 and 54: Chapter 3 of the comparative analys
- Page 55 and 56: Chapter 3 Figure 11: Represent the
- Page 57 and 58: Chapter 3 Ether, some 2-D gels were
- Page 59 and 60: Chapter 3 Figure 13: Represent 2-D
- Page 61 and 62:
Chapter 3 Table 5. List of the iden
- Page 63 and 64:
Chapter 3 Table 7. List of the iden
- Page 65 and 66:
Chapter 3 amino acids by Cowan-Whit
- Page 67 and 68:
Chapter 3 Figure 15 C: Represents t
- Page 69 and 70:
Chapter 3 Figure 16 A: Represents t
- Page 71 and 72:
Chapter 3 The polarity value for th
- Page 73 and 74:
Chapter 3 Figure 17: Represents the
- Page 75 and 76:
Chapter 3 Figure 18: Represents the
- Page 77 and 78:
Chapter 3 published papers with mod
- Page 79 and 80:
Chapter 3 ligands revealed less dif
- Page 81 and 82:
Chapter 3 3.2. Influence of the dif
- Page 83 and 84:
Chapter 3 Table 10: The chemistry o
- Page 85 and 86:
Chapter 3 where approximately 50% o
- Page 87 and 88:
Chapter 3 3.2.3.2. The electrophore
- Page 89 and 90:
Chapter 3 Figure 22: Represent 2-D
- Page 91 and 92:
Chapter 3 Table 12. List of the ide
- Page 93 and 94:
Chapter 3 Table 14. List of the ide
- Page 95 and 96:
Chapter 3 r 2 values from the data
- Page 97 and 98:
Chapter 3 Figure 24 C: Represents t
- Page 99 and 100:
Chapter 3 approximately 47%. The me
- Page 101 and 102:
Chapter 3 Figure 25 B: Represents t
- Page 103 and 104:
Chapter 3 values have been reported
- Page 105 and 106:
Chapter 3 towards conformational ch
- Page 107 and 108:
Chapter 3 Figure 28: Represents the
- Page 109 and 110:
Chapter 3 among the adsorbents were
- Page 111 and 112:
Chapter 3 3.3. Protein distribution
- Page 113 and 114:
Chapter 3 3.3.2.2. Protein distribu
- Page 115 and 116:
Chapter 3 Figure 29 B: Represent th
- Page 117 and 118:
Chapter 3 When the number of smalle
- Page 119 and 120:
Chapter 3 and hydrophobic interacti
- Page 121 and 122:
Chapter 4 CONCLUSIONS
- Page 123 and 124:
Chapter 4 • The base supports rev
- Page 125 and 126:
Chapter 4 additional understanding
- Page 127 and 128:
References 13. Lienqueo, M.E.; Lese
- Page 129 and 130:
References 32. Salgado, J.C.; Rapap
- Page 131 and 132:
References 52. B.H.J., H. Accessibl
- Page 133 and 134:
References 71. Xindu, G. and Regnie
- Page 135 and 136:
References 91. Alonso-Orgaz, S.; Mo
- Page 137 and 138:
References 112. Gu, Z. and Glatz, C
- Page 139:
References 132. Reubsaet, J.L.E. an