Thesis final - after defense-7 - Jacobs University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

References 42. Halperin, G.; Breitenbach, M.; Tauber-Finkelstein, M.; Shaltiel, S. Hydrophobic chromatography on homologous series of alkylagaroses : A comparison of charged and electrically neutral column materials. Journal of Chromatography A 1981, 215, 211-228. 43. Hjertén, S.; Yao, K.; Eriksson, K.; Johansson, B. Gradient and isocratic high-performance hydrophobic interaction chromatography of proteins on agarose columns. Journal of Chromatography A 1986, 359, 99-109. 44. Xia, F.; Nagrath, D.; Cramer, S.M. Effect of pH changes on water release values in hydrophobic interaction chromatographic systems. Journal of Chromatography A 2005, 1079, 229-235. 45. Sanz, Y.; Mulholland, F.; Toldra, F. Purification and Characterization of a Tripeptidase from Lactobacillus sake. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 1998, 46, 349-353. 46. Wu, S.; Figueroa, A.; Karger, B.L. Protein conformational effect in hydrophobic interaction chromatography : Retention characterization and the role of mobile phase additives and stationary phase hydrophobicity. Journal of Chromatography A 1986, 371, 3-27. 47. Geng, X.; Guo, L.; Chang, J. Study of the retention mechanism of proteins in hydrophobic interaction chromatography. Journal of Chromatography A 1990, 507, 1-23. 48. Heinitz, M.L.; Kennedy, L.; Kopaciewicz, W.; Regnier, F.E. Chromatography of proteins on hydrophobic interaction and ion-exchange chromatographic matrices: mobile phase contributions to selectivity. Journal of Chromatography A 1988, 443, 173-182. 49. Hjertén, S.; Rosengren, J.; Pahlman, S. Hydrophobic interaction chromatography : The synthesis and the use of some alkyl and aryl derivatives of agarose. Journal of Chromatography A 1974, 101, 281-288. 50. Parsegian, V.A. and Ninham, B.W. Temperature-Dependent van der Waals Forces. Journal of Biochemical and Biophysical Methods 1970, 10, 664-674. 51. Queiroz, J.A.; Tomaz, C.T.; Cabral, J.M.S. Hydrophobic interaction chromatography of proteins. Journal of Biotechnology 2001, 87, 143-159. 121
References 52. B.H.J., H. Accessible hydrophobic groups of native proteins. Biochemical and biophysical research communications 1975, 63, 618-624. 53. B.H.J., H. Hydrophobic affinity chromatography of proteins. Analatyical Biochemistry 1973, 52, 430-448. 54. Shaltiel, S. and Er-El, Z. Hydrophobic Chromatography: use for purification of glycogen synthetase. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1973, 70, 778-781. 55. Hofstee, B.H.J. and Otillio, N.F. Non-ionic adsorption chromatography of proteins. Journal of Chromatography A 1978, 159, 57-69. 56. Hubert, P.; Mathis, R.; Dellacherie, E. Polymer ligands for mild hydrophobic interaction chromatography —principles, achievements and future trends. Journal of Chromatography A 1991, 539, 297-306. 57. Jennissen, H.P. and Heilmeyer, L.M.G. General aspects of hydrophobic chromatography. Adsorption and elution characteristics of some skeletal muscle enzymes. Biochemistry 1975, 14, 754-760. 58. Rosengren, J.; Pahlman, S.; Glad, M.; Hjertén, S. Hydrophobic interaction chromatography on noncharged sepharose® derivatives: Binding of a model protein, related to ionic strength, hydrophobicity of the substituent, and degree of substitution (determined by NMR). Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure and Molecular Enzymology 1975, 412, 51-61. 59. Porath, J.; Janson, J.; Ls, T. Agar derivatives for chromatography, electrophoresis and gelbound enzymes: I. Desulphated and reduced cross-linked agar and agarose in spherical bead form. Journal of Chromatography A 1971, 60, 167-177. 60. Maisano, F.; Belew, M.; Porath, J. Synthesis of new hydrophobic adsorbents based on homologous series of uncharged alkyl sulphide agarose derivatives. Journal of Chromatography A 1985, 321, 305-317. 61. Machold, C.; Deinhofer, K.; Hahn, R.; Jungbauer, A. Hydrophobic interaction chromatography of proteins: I. Comparison of selectivity. Journal of Chromatography A 2002, 972, 3-19. 122
Page 1 and 2:
A proteome wide approach to underst
Page 3 and 4:
I also want to mention the efforts
Page 5 and 6:
Dedication To my father Haji Sher A
Page 7 and 8:
Table of Contents 1. Introduction .
Page 9 and 10:
3.3.2.2. Protein distributions on 2
Page 11 and 12:
Chapter 1 1. Introduction 1.1. Intr
Page 13 and 14:
Chapter 1 cell proteome to facilita
Page 15 and 16:
Chapter 1 proteins. It is this diff
Page 17 and 18:
Chapter 1 Salt conc. decreasing (Gr
Page 19 and 20:
Chapter 1 The ions at the start of
Page 21 and 22:
Chapter 1 exposure of hydrophobic r
Page 23 and 24:
Chapter 1 based on the surface hydr
Page 25 and 26:
Chapter 1 1.5. Analysis of the yeas
Page 27 and 28:
Chapter 1 molecular weight impuriti
Page 29 and 30:
Chapter 1 followed by its introduct
Page 31 and 32:
Chapter 1 protein towards purificat
Page 33 and 34:
Chapter 2 EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH
Page 35 and 36:
Chapter 2 Yeast cell proteome and c
Page 37 and 38:
Chapter 2 ligands (Toyopearl-Hexyl,
Page 39 and 40:
Chapter 2 number of spots was count
Page 41 and 42:
Chapter 2 (http://www.matrixscience
Page 43 and 44:
Chapter 3 RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Page 45 and 46:
Chapter 3 to the retention behavior
Page 47 and 48:
Chapter 3 investigate the hydrophob
Page 49 and 50:
Chapter 3 the interior of the prote
Page 51 and 52:
Chapter 3 A B C Figure 9: The cryst
Page 53 and 54:
Chapter 3 of the comparative analys
Page 55 and 56:
Chapter 3 Figure 11: Represent the
Page 57 and 58:
Chapter 3 Ether, some 2-D gels were
Page 59 and 60:
Chapter 3 Figure 13: Represent 2-D
Page 61 and 62:
Chapter 3 Table 5. List of the iden
Page 63 and 64:
Chapter 3 Table 7. List of the iden
Page 65 and 66:
Chapter 3 amino acids by Cowan-Whit
Page 67 and 68:
Chapter 3 Figure 15 C: Represents t
Page 69 and 70:
Chapter 3 Figure 16 A: Represents t
Page 71 and 72:
Chapter 3 The polarity value for th
Page 73 and 74:
Chapter 3 Figure 17: Represents the
Page 75 and 76:
Chapter 3 Figure 18: Represents the
Page 77 and 78:
Chapter 3 published papers with mod
Page 79 and 80: Chapter 3 ligands revealed less dif
Page 81 and 82: Chapter 3 3.2. Influence of the dif
Page 83 and 84: Chapter 3 Table 10: The chemistry o
Page 85 and 86: Chapter 3 where approximately 50% o
Page 87 and 88: Chapter 3 3.2.3.2. The electrophore
Page 89 and 90: Chapter 3 Figure 22: Represent 2-D
Page 91 and 92: Chapter 3 Table 12. List of the ide
Page 93 and 94: Chapter 3 Table 14. List of the ide
Page 95 and 96: Chapter 3 r 2 values from the data
Page 97 and 98: Chapter 3 Figure 24 C: Represents t
Page 99 and 100: Chapter 3 approximately 47%. The me
Page 101 and 102: Chapter 3 Figure 25 B: Represents t
Page 103 and 104: Chapter 3 values have been reported
Page 105 and 106: Chapter 3 towards conformational ch
Page 107 and 108: Chapter 3 Figure 28: Represents the
Page 109 and 110: Chapter 3 among the adsorbents were
Page 111 and 112: Chapter 3 3.3. Protein distribution
Page 113 and 114: Chapter 3 3.3.2.2. Protein distribu
Page 115 and 116: Chapter 3 Figure 29 B: Represent th
Page 117 and 118: Chapter 3 When the number of smalle
Page 119 and 120: Chapter 3 and hydrophobic interacti
Page 121 and 122: Chapter 4 CONCLUSIONS
Page 123 and 124: Chapter 4 • The base supports rev
Page 125 and 126: Chapter 4 additional understanding
Page 127 and 128: References 13. Lienqueo, M.E.; Lese
Page 129: References 32. Salgado, J.C.; Rapap
Page 133 and 134: References 71. Xindu, G. and Regnie
Page 135 and 136: References 91. Alonso-Orgaz, S.; Mo
Page 137 and 138: References 112. Gu, Z. and Glatz, C
Page 139: References 132. Reubsaet, J.L.E. an
show all

Thesis final - after defense-7 - Jacobs University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?