Thesis final - after defense-7 - Jacobs University
Thesis final - after defense-7 - Jacobs University
Thesis final - after defense-7 - Jacobs University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 3<br />
approximately 47%. The membrane proteins with the low polarity need detergents to be<br />
separated from respective membranes due to hydrophobic interactions (117). However, in the<br />
same study the polarity has not been correlated with the protein retention behavior in HIC.<br />
The polarity values for the same protein on Grantham’s scale were almost one digit higher<br />
than Zimmerman’s scale. This could be due to the different approaches used by the two<br />
researchers while calculating the polarity indices for individual amino acids. It has been<br />
reported that polar residues are normally located in the outer part of the protein while nonpolar<br />
residues in the inner portion (117). The polarity of a protein has a direct relationship<br />
with the number of polar residues (Asp, Asn, Glu, Lys, Arg and Gln) in the protein sequence.<br />
An inverse relationship was reported between polarity and retention behavior of the proteins<br />
(Figure 25 A-B). This revealed that the proteins with less polarity have a more non-polar<br />
surface area and resulted in stronger binding to the HIC surface. In contrast, proteins with<br />
high polarity had more polar and less non-polar surface area, resulting in less binding to<br />
hydrophobic adsorbents and earlier elution during chromatography. This also ensured that<br />
polarity has an inverse relationship with protein hydrophobicity.<br />
90