Minutes of the ordinary Council meeting - 25 September 2012
Minutes of the ordinary Council meeting - 25 September 2012
Minutes of the ordinary Council meeting - 25 September 2012
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Faecal matter run-<strong>of</strong>f from properties with stock on <strong>the</strong>m that may contain<br />
pathogens and viruses harmful to human health.<br />
There are many ways <strong>of</strong> improving <strong>the</strong> protection <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> catchment. The most<br />
practiced is revegetation <strong>of</strong> river corridors and catchment areas. Vegetation along<br />
river corridors and in catchment areas traps run<strong>of</strong>f from properties and provides<br />
filtration <strong>of</strong> run<strong>of</strong>f prior to it entering <strong>the</strong> river. This also significantly reduces <strong>the</strong><br />
potential for erosion and greatly improves <strong>the</strong> control <strong>of</strong> sedimentation within <strong>the</strong><br />
environment.<br />
To ensure that <strong>Council</strong> protects <strong>the</strong> Sherwood Borefield catchment area, in 2010<br />
<strong>Council</strong> staff prepared a Plan <strong>of</strong> Management for <strong>the</strong> Borefield. The Plan <strong>of</strong><br />
Management identified a number <strong>of</strong> areas requiring remediation works, to reduce<br />
run<strong>of</strong>f and erosion, and suggested a number <strong>of</strong> methods <strong>of</strong> remediation, including<br />
engineering works and revegetation. Revegetation in most circumstances is <strong>the</strong><br />
preferred option as it is usually less expensive and more aes<strong>the</strong>tically pleasing in<br />
appearance.<br />
In 2011, <strong>Council</strong> began discussions with <strong>the</strong> Catchment Management Authority<br />
(CMA) to develop ways in which we could work toge<strong>the</strong>r with adjacent landholders<br />
in implementing <strong>the</strong> revegetation works suggested in <strong>the</strong> Plan <strong>of</strong> Management. The<br />
CMA suggested that <strong>Council</strong> support a large scale project for biodiversity<br />
revegetation in <strong>the</strong> area toge<strong>the</strong>r with <strong>the</strong> landholders. The CMA applied for and<br />
was successful in obtaining grant funding, over three years for this project.<br />
<strong>Council</strong>‟s involvement in this project includes undertaking revegetation works<br />
adjacent to <strong>the</strong> recharge channel, at cost, and revegetation works within <strong>the</strong> river<br />
corridor, funded by <strong>the</strong> grant. A map <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> intended work by <strong>Council</strong> has been<br />
included as an attachment (Appendix D – Page IS37).<br />
Upstream property owners will also be participating in this program through<br />
vegetation <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> river corridors on <strong>the</strong>ir properties. It should be noted by <strong>Council</strong><br />
that some <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> land is actually owned by <strong>Council</strong> for flood mitigation purposes,<br />
but for a long time has been managed by <strong>the</strong>se landholders.<br />
To receive <strong>the</strong> grant funding, <strong>Council</strong> is required to enter into a contract with <strong>the</strong><br />
CMA to ensure we deliver <strong>the</strong> services in accordance with <strong>the</strong> grant application. The<br />
project will involve staff from <strong>Council</strong>‟s Infrastructure and Sustainable Environment<br />
Divisions to deliver <strong>the</strong> outcomes. The contract requires <strong>Council</strong> to expend <strong>the</strong><br />
funds and provide reporting upon completion <strong>of</strong> milestones. The overall funding for<br />
<strong>the</strong> program has been outlined in <strong>the</strong> table below.<br />
CMA<br />
Funding<br />
<strong>Council</strong><br />
Contribution<br />
Grant<br />
Year 1 Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 TOTAL<br />
2011/12 <strong>2012</strong>/13 2013/14 2014/15<br />
$27,300 $11,700 $84,300 $41,000 $164,300<br />
$50,000 $13,000 $115,000 $60,000 $238,000<br />
It should be noted that due to delays in grant processing, Years 1 and 2 have been<br />
rolled toge<strong>the</strong>r to be delivered in <strong>2012</strong>/13.<br />
The financial contribution from <strong>Council</strong> is funded through existing operational and<br />
capital budget allocations in <strong>the</strong> Water Fund for source water control activities. This<br />
was originally intended to undertake activities within <strong>the</strong> borefield & recharge<br />
Kempsey Shire <strong>Council</strong> FULL TEXT <strong>Minutes</strong> Ordinary Meeting <strong>25</strong> <strong>September</strong> <strong>2012</strong> Page 66