in vitro PHARMACOLOGY 2011 CATALOG - Cerep
in vitro PHARMACOLOGY 2011 CATALOG - Cerep
in vitro PHARMACOLOGY 2011 CATALOG - Cerep
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
74 <strong>in</strong> <strong>vitro</strong> pharmacology <strong>2011</strong> catalog<br />
❚ somatostat<strong>in</strong><br />
sst 2 - agonist radioligand<br />
b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Ref. 2339<br />
Q 6 weeks<br />
Source<br />
Ligand<br />
Kd<br />
Non specific<br />
Reference<br />
IMR32 cells (endogenous)<br />
[ 125 I]Tyr 11 -somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14 (0.04 nM)<br />
0.2 nM<br />
seglitide (1 µM)<br />
seglitide (IC 50 : 0.2 nM)<br />
O’Dorisio, M.S. et al. (1994) Cell Growth Differ., 5: 1-8.<br />
specific b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g (% of control)<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
-12 -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5<br />
log [drug] (M)<br />
seglitide<br />
somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14<br />
CYN 154806<br />
BIM 23027<br />
sst 4 - agonist radioligand<br />
b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Ref. 0482<br />
Q 3 weeks<br />
Included <strong>in</strong>:<br />
BioPr<strong>in</strong>t ® profile<br />
Organ safety profile<br />
Source<br />
Ligand<br />
Kd<br />
Non specific<br />
Reference<br />
human recomb<strong>in</strong>ant (CHO cells)<br />
[ 125 I]Tyr 11 -somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14 (0.1 nM)<br />
5.9 nM<br />
somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14 (1 µM)<br />
somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14 (IC 50 : 1.4 nM)<br />
Rohrer, L. et al. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90: 4196-4200.<br />
specific b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g (% of control)<br />
100<br />
50<br />
0<br />
-11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5<br />
log [drug] (M)<br />
▲ somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14<br />
● [D-Trp 8 ]-<br />
somatostat<strong>in</strong><br />
■ somatostat<strong>in</strong>-28<br />
▼ BIM 23056<br />
sst 4<br />
cellul ar<br />
Ref. 2095<br />
Ref. 2103<br />
Q 3 weeks<br />
Agonist effect<br />
Antagonist effect<br />
Source<br />
human recomb<strong>in</strong>ant (CHO cells)<br />
Measured product cAMP<br />
Detection method HTRF<br />
Agonist effect Control somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14 (100 nM)<br />
Reference somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14 (EC 50 : 0.21 nM)<br />
Antagonist effect Stimulant somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14 (3 nM)<br />
Reference unavailable<br />
Engström, M. et al. (2005) J. Pharm. Exp. Ther., 312: 332-338.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[Solvent] must be kept 0.3%<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
sst 5 - agonist radioligand<br />
Source<br />
human recomb<strong>in</strong>ant (CHO cells)<br />
Ligand<br />
[ 125 I]Tyr 11 -somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14 (0.1 nM)<br />
b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Kd<br />
0.2 nM<br />
Ref. 0626<br />
Non specific somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14 (1 µM)<br />
Q 3 weeks<br />
Reference somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14 (IC 50 : 0.76 nM)<br />
Included <strong>in</strong>:<br />
Organ safety profile<br />
Yamada, Y. et al. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 195: 844-852.<br />
specific b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g (% of control)<br />
100<br />
<br />
<br />
50<br />
<br />
0<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
log [drug] (M)<br />
<br />
<br />
-13 - 12 -11 - 10 -9 -8 -7 -6<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14<br />
[D-Trp 8 ]-<br />
somatostat<strong>in</strong><br />
somatostat<strong>in</strong>-28<br />
BIM 23056<br />
sst 5<br />
cellul ar<br />
Ref. 2087<br />
Ref. 2088<br />
Q 3 weeks<br />
Agonist effect<br />
Antagonist effect<br />
Source<br />
human recomb<strong>in</strong>ant (CHO cells)<br />
Measured product cAMP<br />
Detection method HTRF<br />
Agonist effect Control somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14 (300 nM)<br />
Reference somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14 (EC 50 : 6.1 nM)<br />
Antagonist effect Stimulant somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14 (100 nM)<br />
Reference unavailable<br />
Carruthers, A.M. et al. (1999) Brit. J. Pharmacol., 126: 1221-1229.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
[Solvent] must be kept 0.3%<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
For some b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g assays two models are available us<strong>in</strong>g either agonist or antagonist as radioligand.<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
❚ For radioligand b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g assays, how should I choose between the agonist and the antagonist models when both are<br />
<br />
available?<br />
<br />
G-prote<strong>in</strong>-coupled receptors have both high-aff<strong>in</strong>ity and low-aff<strong>in</strong>ity states that are bound differently by agonists and antagonists. Whereas<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
the antagonists b<strong>in</strong>d with an equal aff<strong>in</strong>ity to both aff<strong>in</strong>ity states, agonists b<strong>in</strong>d poorly to the low aff<strong>in</strong>ity state of the receptor. Therefore,<br />
it is advisable to use an antagonist radioligand to evaluate the b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of antagonists know<strong>in</strong>g that this may fail to reveal the b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />
of agonists. On the other hand, an assay us<strong>in</strong>g an agonist radioligand is suitable to evaluate both agonists and antagonists.<br />
The test<strong>in</strong>g of a compound <strong>in</strong> both assays and the comparison of its competition curves aga<strong>in</strong>st each radioligand may provide <strong>in</strong>formation<br />
about its functional activity at the receptor.