31.03.2014 Views

in vitro PHARMACOLOGY 2011 CATALOG - Cerep

in vitro PHARMACOLOGY 2011 CATALOG - Cerep

in vitro PHARMACOLOGY 2011 CATALOG - Cerep

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

74 <strong>in</strong> <strong>vitro</strong> pharmacology <strong>2011</strong> catalog<br />

❚ somatostat<strong>in</strong><br />

sst 2 - agonist radioligand<br />

b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Ref. 2339<br />

Q 6 weeks<br />

Source<br />

Ligand<br />

Kd<br />

Non specific<br />

Reference<br />

IMR32 cells (endogenous)<br />

[ 125 I]Tyr 11 -somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14 (0.04 nM)<br />

0.2 nM<br />

seglitide (1 µM)<br />

seglitide (IC 50 : 0.2 nM)<br />

O’Dorisio, M.S. et al. (1994) Cell Growth Differ., 5: 1-8.<br />

specific b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g (% of control)<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

-12 -11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5<br />

log [drug] (M)<br />

seglitide<br />

somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14<br />

CYN 154806<br />

BIM 23027<br />

sst 4 - agonist radioligand<br />

b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Ref. 0482<br />

Q 3 weeks<br />

Included <strong>in</strong>:<br />

BioPr<strong>in</strong>t ® profile<br />

Organ safety profile<br />

Source<br />

Ligand<br />

Kd<br />

Non specific<br />

Reference<br />

human recomb<strong>in</strong>ant (CHO cells)<br />

[ 125 I]Tyr 11 -somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14 (0.1 nM)<br />

5.9 nM<br />

somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14 (1 µM)<br />

somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14 (IC 50 : 1.4 nM)<br />

Rohrer, L. et al. (1993) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 90: 4196-4200.<br />

specific b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g (% of control)<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

-11 -10 -9 -8 -7 -6 -5<br />

log [drug] (M)<br />

▲ somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14<br />

● [D-Trp 8 ]-<br />

somatostat<strong>in</strong><br />

■ somatostat<strong>in</strong>-28<br />

▼ BIM 23056<br />

sst 4<br />

cellul ar<br />

Ref. 2095<br />

Ref. 2103<br />

Q 3 weeks<br />

Agonist effect<br />

Antagonist effect<br />

Source<br />

human recomb<strong>in</strong>ant (CHO cells)<br />

Measured product cAMP<br />

Detection method HTRF<br />

Agonist effect Control somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14 (100 nM)<br />

Reference somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14 (EC 50 : 0.21 nM)<br />

Antagonist effect Stimulant somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14 (3 nM)<br />

Reference unavailable<br />

Engström, M. et al. (2005) J. Pharm. Exp. Ther., 312: 332-338.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

[Solvent] must be kept 0.3%<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

sst 5 - agonist radioligand<br />

Source<br />

human recomb<strong>in</strong>ant (CHO cells)<br />

Ligand<br />

[ 125 I]Tyr 11 -somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14 (0.1 nM)<br />

b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Kd<br />

0.2 nM<br />

Ref. 0626<br />

Non specific somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14 (1 µM)<br />

Q 3 weeks<br />

Reference somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14 (IC 50 : 0.76 nM)<br />

Included <strong>in</strong>:<br />

Organ safety profile<br />

Yamada, Y. et al. (1993) Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 195: 844-852.<br />

specific b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g (% of control)<br />

100<br />

<br />

<br />

50<br />

<br />

0<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

log [drug] (M)<br />

<br />

<br />

-13 - 12 -11 - 10 -9 -8 -7 -6<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14<br />

[D-Trp 8 ]-<br />

somatostat<strong>in</strong><br />

somatostat<strong>in</strong>-28<br />

BIM 23056<br />

sst 5<br />

cellul ar<br />

Ref. 2087<br />

Ref. 2088<br />

Q 3 weeks<br />

Agonist effect<br />

Antagonist effect<br />

Source<br />

human recomb<strong>in</strong>ant (CHO cells)<br />

Measured product cAMP<br />

Detection method HTRF<br />

Agonist effect Control somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14 (300 nM)<br />

Reference somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14 (EC 50 : 6.1 nM)<br />

Antagonist effect Stimulant somatostat<strong>in</strong>-14 (100 nM)<br />

Reference unavailable<br />

Carruthers, A.M. et al. (1999) Brit. J. Pharmacol., 126: 1221-1229.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

[Solvent] must be kept 0.3%<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

For some b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g assays two models are available us<strong>in</strong>g either agonist or antagonist as radioligand.<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

❚ For radioligand b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g assays, how should I choose between the agonist and the antagonist models when both are<br />

<br />

available?<br />

<br />

G-prote<strong>in</strong>-coupled receptors have both high-aff<strong>in</strong>ity and low-aff<strong>in</strong>ity states that are bound differently by agonists and antagonists. Whereas<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

the antagonists b<strong>in</strong>d with an equal aff<strong>in</strong>ity to both aff<strong>in</strong>ity states, agonists b<strong>in</strong>d poorly to the low aff<strong>in</strong>ity state of the receptor. Therefore,<br />

it is advisable to use an antagonist radioligand to evaluate the b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g of antagonists know<strong>in</strong>g that this may fail to reveal the b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

of agonists. On the other hand, an assay us<strong>in</strong>g an agonist radioligand is suitable to evaluate both agonists and antagonists.<br />

The test<strong>in</strong>g of a compound <strong>in</strong> both assays and the comparison of its competition curves aga<strong>in</strong>st each radioligand may provide <strong>in</strong>formation<br />

about its functional activity at the receptor.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!