Innovation in Global Power - Parsons Brinckerhoff
Innovation in Global Power - Parsons Brinckerhoff
Innovation in Global Power - Parsons Brinckerhoff
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Hydropower – New Technologies, New Considerations<br />
http://www.pbworld.com/news_events/publications/network/<br />
Deck Slot Cutt<strong>in</strong>g and Ta<strong>in</strong>ter Gate Remediation<br />
Extend Safe Operations of a Hydroelectric Dam<br />
By Marc Buratto, Boston, Massachusetts, 1-617-960-4973, buratto@pbworld.com; Anthony Plizga, 1-617-960-4972, plizga@pbworld.com; and<br />
Paul Shiers, 1-617-960-4990, shiers@pbworld.com<br />
Cutt<strong>in</strong>g expansion slots cut<br />
<strong>in</strong>to a dam’s concrete spillway<br />
deck is one of the<br />
structural repairs that may<br />
be necessary to ensure<br />
that ag<strong>in</strong>g hydroelectric<br />
dams operate reliably dur<strong>in</strong>g<br />
storm or flood events. PB<br />
oversaw implementation of<br />
such a solution for a dam<br />
where structural movement<br />
caused problems with gate<br />
operations. The authors<br />
tell about the slot cutt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
and gate remediation, and<br />
measures taken to protect<br />
water quality dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
process.<br />
Figure 1: The Yadk<strong>in</strong> Project’s<br />
Narrows Dam <strong>in</strong> North Carol<strong>in</strong>a.<br />
1 A Ta<strong>in</strong>ter gate is a type of radial-arm<br />
floodgate used <strong>in</strong> dams and canal<br />
locks to control water flow.<br />
Narrows Dam is one of four dams that comprise the Yadk<strong>in</strong> Project, a hydroelectric plant<br />
owned and operated by Yadk<strong>in</strong> Division of Alcoa <strong>Power</strong> Generat<strong>in</strong>g, Inc. The Narrows facility<br />
<strong>in</strong>cludes four units with a total capacity <strong>in</strong> excess of 110 MW. It generates more than half the<br />
hydropower for the Yadk<strong>in</strong> Project.<br />
Completed <strong>in</strong> 1917, Narrows Dam is a concrete gravity structure with a maximum height of<br />
61 m (200 feet). It consists of a ma<strong>in</strong> dam section and a bypass spillway structure (Figure 1).<br />
The ma<strong>in</strong> spillway deck has an <strong>in</strong>tegral concrete slab and steel beam support system spann<strong>in</strong>g<br />
between spillway piers. It is restra<strong>in</strong>ed laterally by a non-overflow section at one end and an<br />
<strong>in</strong>take structure at the opposite end. No expansion jo<strong>in</strong>ts were <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>in</strong> the orig<strong>in</strong>al design<br />
of the spillway deck. Twenty-two Ta<strong>in</strong>ter gates are <strong>in</strong>stalled atop the ma<strong>in</strong> spillway to release<br />
surplus water dur<strong>in</strong>g storm or flood events. Each is 7.6 m (25 feet) wide by 3.7 m (12 feet)<br />
high. 1<br />
The lack of expansion jo<strong>in</strong>ts caused a portion of the deck slab adjacent to the <strong>in</strong>take to buckle<br />
under normal thermal conditions <strong>in</strong> the early 1990s. This buckl<strong>in</strong>g caused a redistribution of<br />
built-up forces <strong>in</strong> the deck to the nearby piers, result<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> the movement of the pier caps<br />
towards the <strong>in</strong>take. As a result, several Ta<strong>in</strong>ter gates could not be fully opened dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
five-year full-open gate test<strong>in</strong>g exercise <strong>in</strong> 2001, caus<strong>in</strong>g concerns about safety. Cont<strong>in</strong>uous<br />
dam safety is mandated by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the licens<strong>in</strong>g<br />
agency, so a remediation program was enacted to restore full open<strong>in</strong>g of all the Ta<strong>in</strong>ter gates.<br />
PB was responsible for the eng<strong>in</strong>eer<strong>in</strong>g and construction oversight of the remediation effort.<br />
Our recommendation called for cutt<strong>in</strong>g new slots <strong>in</strong>to the deck and rehabilitat<strong>in</strong>g the gates. In<br />
addition to the actual slot cutt<strong>in</strong>g, the effort <strong>in</strong>volved:<br />
• Install<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>strumentation to monitor deck and pier movements<br />
• Mobiliz<strong>in</strong>g and sett<strong>in</strong>g up cutt<strong>in</strong>g equipment, environmental<br />
compliance equipment and support systems.<br />
• Develop<strong>in</strong>g a quality control <strong>in</strong>spection program to make sure the<br />
field activities were completed correctly dur<strong>in</strong>g construction.<br />
The Slot Cutt<strong>in</strong>g<br />
Three methods of cutt<strong>in</strong>g were considered—the diamond wire saw,<br />
concrete saw, and overlapp<strong>in</strong>g drill core methods. Most dam sites use<br />
an overlapp<strong>in</strong>g drill core method to re-establish expansion jo<strong>in</strong>ts due<br />
to deck configuration, construction jo<strong>in</strong>t layout and other issues, such<br />
as embedded conduits. In this situation, the configuration of the deck<br />
and slots ruled out the use of the concrete saw method, and aesthetic<br />
issues associated with the overlapp<strong>in</strong>g drill cores ruled out that<br />
method. The wire saw method allowed the most favorable option for remov<strong>in</strong>g the saw<br />
cable if b<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g occurred dur<strong>in</strong>g cutt<strong>in</strong>g due to slot closure. Removal could be accomplished<br />
by simply mak<strong>in</strong>g another wire saw cable to cut through the bound cable without significant<br />
demolition activities adjacent to the cuts. A 1.6-cm (0.625-<strong>in</strong>ch) diamond wire saw was used<br />
to cut the slots.<br />
Slot cutt<strong>in</strong>g work was conf<strong>in</strong>ed to the deck of the ma<strong>in</strong> spillway, right non-overflow section,<br />
and the deck between the <strong>in</strong>take and bypass spillway. One slot was cut first at the right <br />
41 PB Network #68 / August 2008