Innovation in Global Power - Parsons Brinckerhoff
Innovation in Global Power - Parsons Brinckerhoff
Innovation in Global Power - Parsons Brinckerhoff
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
http://www.pbworld.com/news_events/publications/network/<br />
Renewables – The Risks, Concerns and Potential<br />
Renewable Energy — Susta<strong>in</strong>able Economy?<br />
By Dom<strong>in</strong>ic Cook, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK, 44 191 226 2203, cookDo@pbworld.com<br />
This article is based on a<br />
report produced to <strong>in</strong>form<br />
the debate around the<br />
future mix of power generation<br />
<strong>in</strong> the UK dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />
government’s 2006 Energy<br />
Review by provid<strong>in</strong>g an<br />
<strong>in</strong>dependent statement of<br />
the costs of power generation<br />
at that time. It not<br />
only reflects the high level<br />
of work done by PB’s<br />
power specialists, it<br />
provides readers with<br />
answers to some questions<br />
clients around the world<br />
contend with.<br />
Table 1: Characteristics and<br />
costs of technologies studied.<br />
1 These are the estimated<br />
eng<strong>in</strong>eer/procure/construct (EPC)<br />
costs for each technology exclud<strong>in</strong>g<br />
owners soft costs and cont<strong>in</strong>gency.<br />
Renewable technologies are at differ<strong>in</strong>g stages <strong>in</strong> their development. Onshore w<strong>in</strong>d generation,<br />
for example, is regarded as be<strong>in</strong>g virtually competitive <strong>in</strong> its own right without external support<br />
given the right comb<strong>in</strong>ation of project specifics. This stage of advancement contrasts with those<br />
of other renewable energy generation technologies that struggle to break out from the prototyp<strong>in</strong>g<br />
stage and f<strong>in</strong>d convergence on a s<strong>in</strong>gle implementation model (for example, wave/tidal).<br />
The technologies that are considered <strong>in</strong> this article are:<br />
• Coal pulverised fuel<br />
• Gas-fired comb<strong>in</strong>ed cycle gas turb<strong>in</strong>es<br />
• Coal IGCC<br />
• Nuclear<br />
• Onshore w<strong>in</strong>d<br />
• Offshore w<strong>in</strong>d<br />
• Wave<br />
• Tidal.<br />
• Biomass<br />
This list <strong>in</strong>cludes technologies that are available currently and those that are considered to<br />
comprise the next generation of renewable generation. They were compared us<strong>in</strong>g a discounted<br />
cashflow model of the technology capital and operational costs over a typical project life.<br />
Long-term gas and coal fuel prices were assumed to be 37 pence/therm and $49/tonne.<br />
Whilst there are local cost factors that affect the analysis, the ma<strong>in</strong> factor is the relative price<br />
for each energy source.<br />
Technology Summary<br />
The characteristics of the various power generation technologies reviewed are discussed<br />
below and summarized <strong>in</strong> Table 1.<br />
Coal pulverised fuel. Conventional<br />
pulverised fuel (PF) combustion is<br />
a common form of generation<br />
technology found throughout the<br />
world. It is well proven and considered<br />
to be a mature technology.<br />
The key design features of a conventional<br />
PF plant are the pressure<br />
and temperature at which steam is<br />
generated. The majority of plants<br />
<strong>in</strong>stalled to date operate at subcritical steam conditions; however, supercritical and advanced<br />
super-critical boilers are becom<strong>in</strong>g the technology of choice for new coal plant construction.<br />
A new coal-fired PF plant will have to meet environmental legislation to be considered a<br />
“best available technology” and will have to meet environmental legislation through the fitment<br />
of emissions control systems. These are important aspects of all types of coal PF plant, and<br />
the associated costs can be m<strong>in</strong>imised through the specification of the fuel to be burned.<br />
Comb<strong>in</strong>ed cycle gas turb<strong>in</strong>e (CCGT). In a CCGT power plant, the hot exhaust gases from<br />
the gas turb<strong>in</strong>e are delivered to a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) where heat energy<br />
<strong>in</strong> the gases is transferred to water, which is then converted to high-pressure, high-temperature<br />
steam. This steam is then delivered to a steam turb<strong>in</strong>e. About two thirds of the electrical<br />
power is derived from the gas turb<strong>in</strong>e and one third from the steam turb<strong>in</strong>e.<br />
Our study assumed the use of a “state-of-the-art” heavy-duty gas turb<strong>in</strong>e based CCGT because<br />
of the high cost of gas fuel and the high level of competition between electricity generators.<br />
<br />
45 PB Network #68 / August 2008