23.04.2014 Views

Innovation in Global Power - Parsons Brinckerhoff

Innovation in Global Power - Parsons Brinckerhoff

Innovation in Global Power - Parsons Brinckerhoff

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

http://www.pbworld.com/news_events/publications/network/<br />

Renewables – The Risks, Concerns and Potential<br />

Renewable Energy — Susta<strong>in</strong>able Economy?<br />

By Dom<strong>in</strong>ic Cook, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK, 44 191 226 2203, cookDo@pbworld.com<br />

This article is based on a<br />

report produced to <strong>in</strong>form<br />

the debate around the<br />

future mix of power generation<br />

<strong>in</strong> the UK dur<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

government’s 2006 Energy<br />

Review by provid<strong>in</strong>g an<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependent statement of<br />

the costs of power generation<br />

at that time. It not<br />

only reflects the high level<br />

of work done by PB’s<br />

power specialists, it<br />

provides readers with<br />

answers to some questions<br />

clients around the world<br />

contend with.<br />

Table 1: Characteristics and<br />

costs of technologies studied.<br />

1 These are the estimated<br />

eng<strong>in</strong>eer/procure/construct (EPC)<br />

costs for each technology exclud<strong>in</strong>g<br />

owners soft costs and cont<strong>in</strong>gency.<br />

Renewable technologies are at differ<strong>in</strong>g stages <strong>in</strong> their development. Onshore w<strong>in</strong>d generation,<br />

for example, is regarded as be<strong>in</strong>g virtually competitive <strong>in</strong> its own right without external support<br />

given the right comb<strong>in</strong>ation of project specifics. This stage of advancement contrasts with those<br />

of other renewable energy generation technologies that struggle to break out from the prototyp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

stage and f<strong>in</strong>d convergence on a s<strong>in</strong>gle implementation model (for example, wave/tidal).<br />

The technologies that are considered <strong>in</strong> this article are:<br />

• Coal pulverised fuel<br />

• Gas-fired comb<strong>in</strong>ed cycle gas turb<strong>in</strong>es<br />

• Coal IGCC<br />

• Nuclear<br />

• Onshore w<strong>in</strong>d<br />

• Offshore w<strong>in</strong>d<br />

• Wave<br />

• Tidal.<br />

• Biomass<br />

This list <strong>in</strong>cludes technologies that are available currently and those that are considered to<br />

comprise the next generation of renewable generation. They were compared us<strong>in</strong>g a discounted<br />

cashflow model of the technology capital and operational costs over a typical project life.<br />

Long-term gas and coal fuel prices were assumed to be 37 pence/therm and $49/tonne.<br />

Whilst there are local cost factors that affect the analysis, the ma<strong>in</strong> factor is the relative price<br />

for each energy source.<br />

Technology Summary<br />

The characteristics of the various power generation technologies reviewed are discussed<br />

below and summarized <strong>in</strong> Table 1.<br />

Coal pulverised fuel. Conventional<br />

pulverised fuel (PF) combustion is<br />

a common form of generation<br />

technology found throughout the<br />

world. It is well proven and considered<br />

to be a mature technology.<br />

The key design features of a conventional<br />

PF plant are the pressure<br />

and temperature at which steam is<br />

generated. The majority of plants<br />

<strong>in</strong>stalled to date operate at subcritical steam conditions; however, supercritical and advanced<br />

super-critical boilers are becom<strong>in</strong>g the technology of choice for new coal plant construction.<br />

A new coal-fired PF plant will have to meet environmental legislation to be considered a<br />

“best available technology” and will have to meet environmental legislation through the fitment<br />

of emissions control systems. These are important aspects of all types of coal PF plant, and<br />

the associated costs can be m<strong>in</strong>imised through the specification of the fuel to be burned.<br />

Comb<strong>in</strong>ed cycle gas turb<strong>in</strong>e (CCGT). In a CCGT power plant, the hot exhaust gases from<br />

the gas turb<strong>in</strong>e are delivered to a heat recovery steam generator (HRSG) where heat energy<br />

<strong>in</strong> the gases is transferred to water, which is then converted to high-pressure, high-temperature<br />

steam. This steam is then delivered to a steam turb<strong>in</strong>e. About two thirds of the electrical<br />

power is derived from the gas turb<strong>in</strong>e and one third from the steam turb<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

Our study assumed the use of a “state-of-the-art” heavy-duty gas turb<strong>in</strong>e based CCGT because<br />

of the high cost of gas fuel and the high level of competition between electricity generators.<br />

<br />

45 PB Network #68 / August 2008

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!