23.04.2014 Views

Innovation in Global Power - Parsons Brinckerhoff

Innovation in Global Power - Parsons Brinckerhoff

Innovation in Global Power - Parsons Brinckerhoff

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Renewables – The Risks, Concerns and Potential<br />

the end of 2010. Their longer term objective is for a rapid<br />

development of the resource to 500MW generat<strong>in</strong>g capacity.<br />

PB was hired by Geodynamics to evaluate alternative power<br />

production technologies and prepare a budget cost<strong>in</strong>g for a<br />

proposed modular power plant. To prove the geothermal<br />

resource, we designed a test facility and a small (1.2 MW)<br />

pilot-scale power plant us<strong>in</strong>g Habanero 3 and Habanero 1<br />

as production and re<strong>in</strong>jection wells.<br />

We considered various options to maximise the potential<br />

power generation capacity based on 100 percent return of<br />

geothermal br<strong>in</strong>e to the deep aquifer without depressurisation<br />

of the geothermal br<strong>in</strong>e or the consequent release of the<br />

dissolved non-condensable gases, such as methane and carbon<br />

dioxide. Options evaluated were:<br />

• Kal<strong>in</strong>a cycle. This technology uses a vary<strong>in</strong>g mix of<br />

ammonia and water around the cycle to maximise the<br />

energy recoverable. The boil<strong>in</strong>g water and ammonia mixture<br />

can closely follow the br<strong>in</strong>e temperature <strong>in</strong> the high-pressure<br />

heat exchangers.<br />

• Organic Rank<strong>in</strong>e cycle. This technology uses an organic<br />

fluid, such as pentane, which is preheated and then vaporized<br />

<strong>in</strong> a series of heat exchangers. The high-pressure vapour<br />

can then be used to drive an expander <strong>in</strong> a manner similar<br />

to a conventional steam turb<strong>in</strong>e plant.<br />

• Flash steam cycle. We developed this new concept after<br />

early modell<strong>in</strong>g showed that a conventional steam power<br />

plant <strong>in</strong> which the water is preheated and then boiled <strong>in</strong> a<br />

series of heat exchangers could not realise the full potential<br />

for heat recovery from the br<strong>in</strong>e. Under the flash steam<br />

cycle, circulat<strong>in</strong>g water is heated so that there is a constant<br />

temperature differential between the br<strong>in</strong>e and the<br />

circulat<strong>in</strong>g water. The high temperature clean water can<br />

then be flashed down <strong>in</strong> two stages to produce steam that<br />

passes to a conventional steam turb<strong>in</strong>e. The exhaust from<br />

the turb<strong>in</strong>e is then cooled <strong>in</strong> an air cooled condenser, and<br />

this condensate is returned to the circulat<strong>in</strong>g water flow.<br />

A summary of the performance and strengths and<br />

weaknesses of the various options is shown <strong>in</strong> Table 1.<br />

Based on a detailed <strong>in</strong>vestigation of power plant options, the<br />

client elected to proceed with the proposed flash steam cycle.<br />

Figure 1: Summary of Performance Strengths and Weaknesses<br />

http://www.pbworld.com/news_events/publications/network/<br />

<strong>Power</strong> Plant Modular Approach<br />

Prelim<strong>in</strong>ary modell<strong>in</strong>g has <strong>in</strong>dicated that the production and<br />

re<strong>in</strong>jection wells should be spaced approximately 1000 m<br />

(3,200 feet) apart to achieve good long-term output from<br />

the geothermal resource. The cost of surface pip<strong>in</strong>g was<br />

found to be significantly higher than the marg<strong>in</strong>al additional<br />

cost of deviated (directional) drill<strong>in</strong>g, so we developed a<br />

configuration of five production and four re<strong>in</strong>jection wells<br />

that could be drilled from a common pad.<br />

The expected flows from the five production wells total<br />

approximately 500 kg/s (1100 lb/s) of br<strong>in</strong>e, which will yield<br />

an average net power output of about 48 MW. This output<br />

is toward the upper capacity limit available from a standard,<br />

two-cyl<strong>in</strong>der, low-pressure steam turb<strong>in</strong>e. The deviated<br />

drill<strong>in</strong>g limitations and steam turb<strong>in</strong>e size limitations both<br />

suggested that this would be a convenient module size for<br />

development of the geothermal resource.<br />

High Pressure Heat Exchangers<br />

The br<strong>in</strong>e heat exchangers have a very high design pressure<br />

that is <strong>in</strong> the range used for super-critical boiler feed<br />

pre-heaters. Unlike these heaters, however, the br<strong>in</strong>e heat<br />

exchangers will require full access on the tube side so the<br />

tubes can be mechanically cleaned to remove scale that can<br />

result from the br<strong>in</strong>e flow<strong>in</strong>g through.<br />

We have had considerable difficulty <strong>in</strong> f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g heat exchanger<br />

vendors who have the technology and experience <strong>in</strong> such<br />

high pressure construction and are will<strong>in</strong>g to make an offer to<br />

design and build. It would seem that there is easily sufficient<br />

work available for the few experienced vendors available that<br />

they do not need to pursue comparatively small “one off”<br />

jobs. To overcome this problem, we have undertaken the<br />

thermal and mechanical design of the high pressure heat<br />

exchangers so that otherwise competent vendors are able<br />

to offer a construction only service. The design that we<br />

developed uses heavy forged tube plates and channels with<br />

pressure seal style, flat plate closures to the channels.<br />

Re<strong>in</strong>jection Pumps<br />

A review of available pump<strong>in</strong>g technology for re<strong>in</strong>jection of the<br />

high pressure br<strong>in</strong>e revealed that the multi-stage centrifugal<br />

pumps used <strong>in</strong> the oil <strong>in</strong>dustry represent the best available<br />

technology. These pumps have been developed to handle<br />

gassy hot fluids contam<strong>in</strong>ated with sand, and they have given<br />

very good service.These pumps are offered conventionally <strong>in</strong><br />

a submersible pump configuration that makes the seal design<br />

comparatively simple. For ease of servic<strong>in</strong>g, however, our<br />

<strong>in</strong>stallation required a horizontal surface mount pump with<br />

conventional motor drive.<br />

PB Network #68 / August 2008 52

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!