Guidelines - City of Oklahoma City
Guidelines - City of Oklahoma City
Guidelines - City of Oklahoma City
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Preservation Standards AND <strong>Guidelines</strong> August 1, 2012<br />
Sprawl & Waste<br />
Re-using older buildings not only sustains their embodied energy, it reduces waste and sprawl. Existing<br />
landfills eventually reach their capacity, and choosing locations for new ones is <strong>of</strong>ten controversial. It<br />
is estimated the building debris from demolition constitutes one-third <strong>of</strong> landfill material. 2 Over the last<br />
30 years, landfills have been filling to capacity and have been ―retired.‖ Of the 20,000 landfills in use<br />
in 1978, approximately 25% were still taking in refuse ten years later. Of those landfills, the EPA estimated<br />
that 1,234 were still open in 2008. The U.S. generated 143.5 million tons <strong>of</strong> building-related<br />
construction and demolition debris in 2008, but only 28% (40.2 million tons) was reused, recycled or<br />
sent to waste-to-energy facilities. 2 Demolition can be costly. In 2010, razing a residential building cost<br />
between $6 and $15 per square foot. Beyond the costs <strong>of</strong> demolition, the cost <strong>of</strong> hauling and dumping<br />
building debris in a landfill is calculated by weight.<br />
Limiting sprawl benefits a municipality by containing the need for expanding infrastructure, including<br />
streets, water and power lines, schools, and emergency and law enforcement services. Demolition <strong>of</strong> a<br />
historic structure is always discouraged, and these design guidelines require review <strong>of</strong> a proposed demolition<br />
by the Historic Preservation Commission. In the past, preservation guidelines were mainly attuned<br />
to the collective historic integrity <strong>of</strong> a district, citing a demolition as detrimental to the overall<br />
character <strong>of</strong> the neighborhood. As municipalities focus on the principles that guide sustainability, design<br />
guidelines reinforce the premise that demolition also squanders embodied energy, produces waste<br />
and requires the use <strong>of</strong> new resources to build anew. Studies have shown that the infrastructure and<br />
services associated with building 100 average-priced homes is three times the revenue produced by the<br />
new properties over a twenty-year period. 4 Furthermore, the open space saved from such development<br />
will actually contribute more to local tax revenue as farm or forest than the cost <strong>of</strong> services if the land<br />
is developed. 3<br />
Debris from demolished buildings accounts<br />
for approximately one-third <strong>of</strong> the<br />
volume in landfills.<br />
2. “Construction and Debris (C & D) Waste Facts”, under Deconstruction <strong>of</strong> C & D Waste at http://<br />
www.advancedrestoration.com.<br />
3. SELC Report on Growth in Middle Tennessee, 14, at http://www.southernenvironment.org/Cases/<br />
smart_growth_tn/growing_report.shtml .<br />
<strong>Oklahoma</strong> <strong>City</strong> Historic Districts 13