Socio-Economic Impact of HIV and AIDS in Tamil nadu
Socio-Economic Impact of HIV and AIDS in Tamil nadu
Socio-Economic Impact of HIV and AIDS in Tamil nadu
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Table 4.7<br />
Change <strong>in</strong> occupational distribution due to <strong>HIV</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>AIDS</strong> (age group 18-60)<br />
(<strong>in</strong> Percentages)<br />
Occupational category Distribution <strong>of</strong> PLWHA Distribution <strong>of</strong> non-<br />
Before test After test PLWHA (non-<strong>HIV</strong><br />
households)<br />
Cultivation 8.0 6.74 5.86<br />
Agri. wage labour 15.58 12.42 11.33<br />
Non-agricultural wage 34.32 29.26 17.55<br />
Self-employed non-agriculture 14.10 12.21 9.16<br />
Salaried 15.16 15.79 12.11<br />
Unemployed 1.47 11.37 8.92<br />
Others 11.37 12.21 35.07<br />
Total 100 100 100<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> persons 475 475 3,328<br />
Table 4.8<br />
Change <strong>in</strong> sectoral distribution due to <strong>HIV</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>AIDS</strong> (Age group 18-60)<br />
(<strong>in</strong> Percentages)<br />
Occupational category Distribution <strong>of</strong> PLWHA Distribution <strong>of</strong> non-<br />
Before After test PLWHA (non-<strong>HIV</strong><br />
test<br />
households)<br />
Agriculture <strong>and</strong> allied 24.42 19.58 18.18<br />
Manufactur<strong>in</strong>g & construction 22.31 19.16 19.65<br />
Trade, transport, comm, hotels & rest 26.95 22.53 8.38<br />
Health 2.10 2.74 1.17<br />
Other services 11.37 12.42 8.92<br />
Not available 12.84 23.58 43.63<br />
Others 0.00 0.00 0.06<br />
Total 100 100 100<br />
Number <strong>of</strong> persons 475 475 3,328<br />
who had to give up his/her job <strong>in</strong> order<br />
to take care <strong>of</strong> the <strong>HIV</strong> patient. While<br />
these ratios cannot be taken as true<br />
population parameters, they may be<br />
taken as <strong>in</strong>dicative <strong>of</strong> the impact on<br />
labour supply due to <strong>HIV</strong> epidemic.<br />
Further, this impact is likely to grow<br />
<strong>in</strong> the future with an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>HIV</strong><br />
prevalence <strong>and</strong> a higher percentage <strong>of</strong><br />
these patients requir<strong>in</strong>g someone to take<br />
care <strong>of</strong> them. Even if the prevalence rates<br />
rema<strong>in</strong> constant, the impact is go<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to be felt as the number <strong>of</strong> PLWHA <strong>in</strong><br />
advanced stages <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>fection tends to<br />
<strong>in</strong>crease. Further, the absolute numbers<br />
are go<strong>in</strong>g to be very high even if the<br />
proportion seems to be small.<br />
The distribution across sectors <strong>of</strong> the<br />
caregivers that are employed is shown<br />
<strong>in</strong> table 4.10. In the sample, a higher<br />
proportion <strong>of</strong> caregivers are work<strong>in</strong>g as<br />
wage labourers <strong>in</strong> both urban <strong>and</strong> rural<br />
samples. A lesser number <strong>of</strong> them are<br />
<strong>Impact</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>HIV</strong> Status on Income <strong>and</strong> Employment <strong>in</strong> India<br />
39