20.10.2014 Views

Socio-Economic Impact of HIV and AIDS in Tamil nadu

Socio-Economic Impact of HIV and AIDS in Tamil nadu

Socio-Economic Impact of HIV and AIDS in Tamil nadu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Chapter 5<br />

<strong>Impact</strong> on the Level <strong>and</strong><br />

Pattern <strong>of</strong> Consumption <strong>and</strong><br />

Sav<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the Households<br />

5.1 Consumption patterns<br />

The pattern <strong>of</strong> expenditure <strong>of</strong> the sample<br />

<strong>HIV</strong> <strong>and</strong> non-<strong>HIV</strong> households is presented<br />

<strong>in</strong> table 5.1 separately for rural <strong>and</strong> urban<br />

areas. The <strong>HIV</strong> households spend a<br />

relatively lower proportion <strong>of</strong> their total<br />

consumption expenditure on food than<br />

the non-<strong>HIV</strong> households both <strong>in</strong> rural<br />

<strong>and</strong> urban areas. However, both <strong>in</strong> <strong>HIV</strong><br />

<strong>and</strong> non-<strong>HIV</strong> samples, the urbanites<br />

seem to spend less on food than the<br />

rural households. From the table, it<br />

appears that this could be <strong>in</strong> order to<br />

make up for the high rents that they<br />

need to pay. The <strong>HIV</strong> households <strong>in</strong> the<br />

sample seem to be spend<strong>in</strong>g quite a huge<br />

proportion <strong>of</strong> their <strong>in</strong>come, next only to<br />

food & other non-food, on rent, <strong>and</strong> this<br />

is, <strong>in</strong> fact, much higher than the non-<strong>HIV</strong><br />

households. This could be because, as<br />

seen <strong>in</strong> chapter three, when compared<br />

to <strong>HIV</strong> households, a higher proportion<br />

<strong>of</strong> non-<strong>HIV</strong> households have their own<br />

houses. Here aga<strong>in</strong>, it is noticed that the<br />

urban people pay much higher rents<br />

than the rural ones. On items like fuel &<br />

light, durables, education <strong>of</strong> children <strong>and</strong><br />

other non-food items, the proportion <strong>of</strong><br />

expenditure by <strong>HIV</strong> households is slightly<br />

Table 5.1<br />

Share <strong>of</strong> expenditure on some <strong>of</strong> the major items<br />

(<strong>in</strong> Percentages)<br />

Item Non-<strong>HIV</strong> households <strong>HIV</strong> households<br />

Rural Urban Total Rural Urban Total<br />

Cereals 16.32 11.54 13.73 11.91 8.59 10.03<br />

Pulses 3.00 2.16 2.55 2.09 1.76 1.90<br />

Other food 30.43 26.91 28.53 31.30 25.91 28.25<br />

Total food 49.75 40.60 44.81 45.29 36.26 40.19<br />

Fuel <strong>and</strong> light 6.51 9.79 8.29 5.94 8.14 7.18<br />

House rent 0.99 6.66 4.05 3.83 13.37 9.22<br />

Cloth<strong>in</strong>g & footwear 4.24 4.05 4.14 4.53 3.88 4.17<br />

Durables 1.66 1.99 1.84 1.57 1.32 1.43<br />

Education <strong>of</strong> children 4.23 4.20 4.22 3.84 2.70 3.20<br />

Medical 5.41 2.54 3.86 11.56 6.10 8.48<br />

Other non-food 27.20 30.16 28.80 23.44 28.23 26.14<br />

Total 100 100 100 100 100 100<br />

<strong>Impact</strong> on the Level <strong>and</strong> Pattern <strong>of</strong> Consumption <strong>and</strong> Sav<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> the Households<br />

49

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!