20.10.2014 Views

Socio-Economic Impact of HIV and AIDS in Tamil nadu

Socio-Economic Impact of HIV and AIDS in Tamil nadu

Socio-Economic Impact of HIV and AIDS in Tamil nadu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

growth <strong>of</strong> CPI <strong>in</strong> 2004-05 over 1999-2000<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrial workers <strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> urban<br />

poverty l<strong>in</strong>e & agricultural labourers<br />

<strong>in</strong> the case <strong>of</strong> rural poverty l<strong>in</strong>e. The<br />

updated poverty l<strong>in</strong>es were Rs. 363.96 for<br />

rural areas, Rs. 551.72 for urban areas <strong>and</strong><br />

Rs. 416.15 as the comb<strong>in</strong>ed poverty l<strong>in</strong>e.<br />

Table 5.15 presents the estimates <strong>in</strong><br />

terms <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>come poverty. The head count<br />

ratio for <strong>HIV</strong> households (30.07) is much<br />

more than that for non-<strong>HIV</strong> households<br />

(9.82). The poor households have a<br />

bigger household size than the nonpoor.<br />

In the present sample the non-<br />

<strong>HIV</strong> households have a bigger family<br />

size as compared to <strong>HIV</strong> households.<br />

The reason for smaller household size<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>HIV</strong> households could be many. It<br />

could be related to <strong>in</strong>fected members<br />

<strong>of</strong> the household deliberately avoid<strong>in</strong>g<br />

progeny, s<strong>in</strong>ce they are <strong>of</strong>ten advised to<br />

do so by the counsellors. It could also<br />

be related to deaths <strong>in</strong> the family.<br />

Table 5.15<br />

Distribution <strong>of</strong> households by <strong>in</strong>come poverty <strong>in</strong> the sample<br />

Non-<strong>HIV</strong> households<br />

Percent share <strong>in</strong> Average household No. <strong>of</strong> Rate <strong>of</strong> Family<br />

Households Income Population Sav<strong>in</strong>g Income households sav<strong>in</strong>g size<br />

BPL 8.65 4.11 9.82 189.44 2,3264 104 0.81 4.66<br />

APL 91.35 95.89 90.18 4,721.16 5,1301 1,099 9.20 4.05<br />

Total 100 100 100 4,329.4 48,878 1,203 8.86 4.10<br />

Rural<br />

BPL 2.92 1.29 3.50 151.16 18,335 19 0.82 4.89<br />

APL 97.08 98.71 96.50 3,468.27 42,284 631 8.20 4.07<br />

Total 100 100 100 3,371.3 41,584 650 8.11 4.09<br />

Urban<br />

BPL 15.37 6.52 17.21 198 24,366 85 0.81 4.61<br />

APL 84.63 93.48 82.79 6,410.44 63,459 468 10.10 4.03<br />

Total 100 100 100 5,455.54 57,450 553 9.50 4.12<br />

<strong>HIV</strong> households<br />

Percent share <strong>in</strong> Average household No. <strong>of</strong> Rate <strong>of</strong> Family<br />

Households Income Population Sav<strong>in</strong>g Income households sav<strong>in</strong>g size<br />

BPL 26.10 9.94 30.07 -4,296.26 14,972 107 -28.70 4.27<br />

APL 73.90 90.06 69.93 53.47 47,888 303 0.11 3.51<br />

Total 100 100 100 -1,081.71 39,298 410 -2.75 3.71<br />

Rural<br />

BPL 26.46 12.12 27.94 -5,923.73 13,291 59 -44.57 4.41<br />

APL 73.54 87.88 72.06 571.34 34,677 164 1.65 3.38<br />

Total 100 100 100 -1,147.09 29,019 223 -3.95 3.65<br />

Urban<br />

BPL 25.67 8.48 27.94 -2,295.83 17,038 48 -13.48 4.10<br />

APL 74.33 91.52 72.06 -557.55 63,475 139 -0.88 3.65<br />

Total 100 100 100 -1,003.74 51,556 187 -1.95 3.77<br />

70 <strong>Socio</strong>-<strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>HIV</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>AIDS</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Tamil</strong> Nadu, India

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!