Socio-Economic Impact of HIV and AIDS in Tamil nadu
Socio-Economic Impact of HIV and AIDS in Tamil nadu
Socio-Economic Impact of HIV and AIDS in Tamil nadu
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Occupational<br />
category<br />
Table 4.13<br />
Loss <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>come <strong>of</strong> caregiver if currently work<strong>in</strong>g by occupational groups<br />
No.<br />
HHs<br />
Average<br />
<strong>in</strong>come<br />
lost due<br />
to leave/<br />
absence<br />
from work<br />
(<strong>in</strong> Rs)<br />
Rural Urban Total<br />
Income<br />
lost as a<br />
percentage<br />
<strong>of</strong> current<br />
household<br />
<strong>in</strong>come<br />
No.<br />
HHs<br />
Average<br />
<strong>in</strong>come<br />
lost due<br />
to leave/<br />
absence<br />
from work<br />
(<strong>in</strong> Rs)<br />
Income<br />
lost as a<br />
percentage<br />
<strong>of</strong> current<br />
household<br />
<strong>in</strong>come<br />
No.<br />
HHDS<br />
Average<br />
<strong>in</strong>come<br />
lost due<br />
to leave/<br />
absence<br />
from work<br />
(<strong>in</strong> Rs)<br />
Income<br />
lost as a<br />
percentage<br />
<strong>of</strong> current<br />
household<br />
<strong>in</strong>come<br />
Cultivation 0 0 0.00 0. 0 0 0 0 0<br />
Agriculture 20 1,513 8.28 5 7,924 36.41 25 2,795 14.74<br />
wage labour<br />
Nonagricultural<br />
11 5,520 15.03 9 889 2.67 20 3,436 9.77<br />
wage<br />
Self-employed<br />
nonagriculture<br />
8 562 1.66 2 1 0.00 10 450 1.45<br />
Salaried 3 333 0.55 6 333 0.47 9 333 0.49<br />
Others 9 1,444 8.82 0 0 0 9 1,300 7.20<br />
Total 51 2,146 8.00 22 2,157 5.67 73 2,150 7.09<br />
It is also possible that the caregiver<br />
may have to completely withdraw from<br />
the labour force <strong>in</strong> order to take care<br />
<strong>of</strong> the PLWHA. However, <strong>in</strong> the present<br />
sample there were no such cases. Overall,<br />
it may be surmised that at the current<br />
stage <strong>of</strong> the <strong>HIV</strong> epidemic <strong>in</strong> the state,<br />
the ma<strong>in</strong> impact on the economy is go<strong>in</strong>g<br />
to come through lower productivity<br />
or withdrawal from labour force <strong>of</strong><br />
PLWHA. The impact due to reduced time<br />
spent by caregivers <strong>in</strong> the labour market<br />
is very low. However, the household level<br />
impact, for the specific households that<br />
experience the tw<strong>in</strong> impacts, is very<br />
significant.<br />
In order to predict some economy-wide<br />
effects <strong>of</strong> the impact <strong>of</strong> <strong>HIV</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>AIDS</strong><br />
the average number <strong>of</strong> workdays lost per<br />
PLWHA worker needs to be observed.<br />
This would provide an <strong>in</strong>dication <strong>of</strong> the<br />
amount <strong>of</strong> loss that would result due<br />
to the depletion <strong>of</strong> manpower. Overall,<br />
the workdays lost for those who had<br />
to take leave or be absent from work<br />
numbered around 44 <strong>in</strong> a year. The<br />
loss was highest for the agriculture<br />
wage labour households. It may be<br />
emphasised that leave/absence also<br />
depends on the stage <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>fection <strong>of</strong><br />
the person <strong>and</strong> the k<strong>in</strong>d <strong>of</strong> work one is<br />
engaged <strong>in</strong>.<br />
When us<strong>in</strong>g these figures to predict<br />
economy-wide effects, however, one<br />
has to keep <strong>in</strong> m<strong>in</strong>d the possibility <strong>of</strong><br />
substitution <strong>of</strong> PLWHA workers with<br />
other non-<strong>HIV</strong> workers. For <strong>in</strong>stance, <strong>in</strong><br />
agricultural households with the PLWHA<br />
still active, only one household reported<br />
hav<strong>in</strong>g spent an extra amount on hired<br />
labourers. In the other two households,<br />
other family members substituted for<br />
44 <strong>Socio</strong>-<strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>HIV</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>AIDS</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Tamil</strong> Nadu, India