20.10.2014 Views

Socio-Economic Impact of HIV and AIDS in Tamil nadu

Socio-Economic Impact of HIV and AIDS in Tamil nadu

Socio-Economic Impact of HIV and AIDS in Tamil nadu

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Table 5.10<br />

Distribution <strong>of</strong> savers <strong>and</strong> non-savers<br />

(<strong>in</strong> Percentages)<br />

Non-<strong>HIV</strong> households<br />

<strong>HIV</strong> households<br />

percent share <strong>in</strong><br />

percent share <strong>in</strong><br />

Household Income Household Income<br />

All<br />

Negative savers 3.33 3.49 33.66 29.98<br />

Zero savers 53.53 43.01 45.37 35.55<br />

Positive savers 43.14 53.5 20.98 34.47<br />

Total 100 100 100 100<br />

Rural<br />

Negative savers 2.77 3.26 34.08 28.54<br />

Zero savers 55.38 44.2 43.5 34.06<br />

Positive savers 41.85 52.54 22.42 37.4<br />

Total 100 100 100 100<br />

Urban<br />

Negative savers 3.98 3.69 33.16 30.94<br />

Zero savers 51.36 42 47.59 36.56<br />

Positive savers 44.67 54.31 19.25 32.5<br />

Total 100 100 100 100<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>come upto Rs. 20,000 the rate is<br />

-26.80, it is -6.83 <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>come group <strong>of</strong><br />

Rs. 30,001-41,000. In the <strong>in</strong>come group<br />

<strong>of</strong> Rs. 41,001-Rs. 84,000 <strong>and</strong> Rs. 84,000<br />

<strong>and</strong> above, the rate <strong>of</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>gs is positive<br />

for <strong>HIV</strong> households as well. It is however,<br />

lesser than the correspond<strong>in</strong>g rates for<br />

the non-<strong>HIV</strong> households. Even <strong>in</strong> <strong>HIV</strong><br />

households, the rate <strong>of</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>gs has<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased with the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>come.<br />

On the whole, while non-<strong>HIV</strong> households<br />

have a total rate <strong>of</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> 8.86 percent,<br />

<strong>HIV</strong> households have a rate <strong>of</strong> -2.75<br />

percent, <strong>and</strong> <strong>in</strong> every <strong>in</strong>come class, the<br />

rate <strong>of</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>gs <strong>of</strong> <strong>HIV</strong> households is less<br />

than that <strong>of</strong> the correspond<strong>in</strong>g figure <strong>in</strong><br />

non-<strong>HIV</strong> households. Although the non-<br />

<strong>HIV</strong> households <strong>in</strong> the sample are better<br />

<strong>of</strong>f economically than the <strong>HIV</strong> households,<br />

this huge difference <strong>in</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>gs can be<br />

expla<strong>in</strong>ed only on the basis <strong>of</strong> the burden<br />

<strong>of</strong> diseases on <strong>HIV</strong> households.<br />

5.3 Cop<strong>in</strong>g mechanism<br />

An important question for the <strong>HIV</strong><br />

households is the method by which<br />

they can cope with the additional<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial burden imposed on them<br />

because <strong>of</strong> the member/members <strong>of</strong><br />

the household turn<strong>in</strong>g out to be <strong>HIV</strong>positive.<br />

One method <strong>of</strong> cop<strong>in</strong>g with the<br />

f<strong>in</strong>ancial burden/loss <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>come ow<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to the <strong>in</strong>fection could be liquidation<br />

<strong>of</strong> assets or borrow<strong>in</strong>gs. In the case<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>HIV</strong> households, this question was<br />

specifically put to them; they were asked<br />

whether they had to borrow or liquidate<br />

any assets <strong>in</strong> order to cope with f<strong>in</strong>ancial<br />

burden/loss <strong>of</strong> <strong>in</strong>come after the family<br />

members tested positive. It needs to be<br />

noted that this is not to be compared to<br />

the change <strong>in</strong> sav<strong>in</strong>gs presented above.<br />

This question relates to liquidation <strong>of</strong><br />

assets/borrow<strong>in</strong>gs by <strong>HIV</strong> households<br />

66 <strong>Socio</strong>-<strong>Economic</strong> <strong>Impact</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>HIV</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>AIDS</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>Tamil</strong> Nadu, India

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!