23.10.2014 Views

the challenges facing landlocked developing countries: a case study ...

the challenges facing landlocked developing countries: a case study ...

the challenges facing landlocked developing countries: a case study ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

With <strong>the</strong> exception of western Africa, <strong>the</strong> south and sou<strong>the</strong>ast Asian <strong>landlocked</strong> <strong>countries</strong>,<br />

Nepal, Bhutan and Laos are performing worse relative to <strong>the</strong>ir neighbors in human<br />

development than <strong>the</strong> <strong>landlocked</strong> <strong>countries</strong> of any o<strong>the</strong>r region. Yet, <strong>the</strong> region is <strong>the</strong> only<br />

one where <strong>the</strong> <strong>landlocked</strong> <strong>countries</strong> have a lower ratio of transportation and insurance costs<br />

to value of exports than <strong>the</strong>ir maritime neighbors. This discrepancy seems to be accounted<br />

for by <strong>the</strong> fact that all three of <strong>the</strong>se <strong>countries</strong> trade predominantly with <strong>the</strong>ir immediate<br />

neighbors. In <strong>the</strong> <strong>case</strong> of Bhutan and Nepal, India is <strong>the</strong> main trading partner, while for Laos<br />

it is Thailand and Viet Nam.<br />

The minimal transoceanic trade of <strong>the</strong>se <strong>countries</strong> appears to result from <strong>the</strong> limited number<br />

of transit corridors. With <strong>the</strong> exception of Lesotho, <strong>the</strong> <strong>countries</strong> of Nepal and Bhutan are<br />

unique in <strong>the</strong> fact that <strong>the</strong>y have only one transit neighbor, India. This implies complete<br />

dependence on India for access to <strong>the</strong> coast, giving India enormous negotiating power.<br />

Interestingly, each has a very different political relationship with India. Bhutan has enjoyed a<br />

very close working relationship with India, and as a result has been granted liberal access to<br />

transit through India. In fact, India allows Bhutanese transit trade to be conducted under <strong>the</strong><br />

supervision of Bhutanese customs, yielding little administrative hassle. In contrast, Nepal’s<br />

relations with India have often been strained, with India often seen to have more influence in<br />

<strong>the</strong> negotiation of treaties and disputes. In 2001/2002, for example, India placed restrictions<br />

on Nepalese trade while <strong>the</strong> two <strong>countries</strong> renegotiated trade treaties.<br />

Relatively poor domestic infrastructure has fur<strong>the</strong>r complicated transit for <strong>the</strong> south and<br />

sou<strong>the</strong>astern Asian <strong>landlocked</strong> <strong>countries</strong> and has precluded <strong>the</strong>m from taking full advantage<br />

of <strong>the</strong> better surrounding infrastructure. Transit trade entering Laos on <strong>the</strong> Thai rail system,<br />

for example, must currently be unloaded and placed on trucks since Laos has not yet<br />

developed a rail system.<br />

- 104 -

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!