"ÐегкоаÑлеÑиÑеÑкого веÑÑника ÐÐÐФ" 4-2009 - ÐоÑковÑкий ...
"ÐегкоаÑлеÑиÑеÑкого веÑÑника ÐÐÐФ" 4-2009 - ÐоÑковÑкий ...
"ÐегкоаÑлеÑиÑеÑкого веÑÑника ÐÐÐФ" 4-2009 - ÐоÑковÑкий ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Средние и длинные дистанции<br />
‘live high, train low’ altitude training could<br />
experience an improvement of nearly 8.5 minutes<br />
(or ?5%) over the 26.2-mile race distance.<br />
Daniels, J.<br />
Training distance runners<br />
Track and Field Coaches Review, 95, (Summer 1995), 2,<br />
pp. 29-33<br />
In the development of a training programme for<br />
longdistance<br />
runners each runner’s strengths and weaknesses<br />
must be considered. This means that early<br />
season emphasis must be placed on weaknesses<br />
and late season emphasis on strengths. For some<br />
runners, emphasising repetition training before<br />
emphasising interval training is best. Others may find<br />
that the demands of interval training are best placed<br />
prior to stressing repetition training. The coach<br />
should remember to pay attention to individual<br />
differences.<br />
To minimise the risk of overtraining within a six<br />
week phase, alternating the difficulty of training on a<br />
weekly basis is helpful. For example, weeks one,<br />
three and five may each involve three quality training<br />
days. Weeks two, four and six may include only two<br />
quality training days. Current performance times can<br />
be used to determine training intensity and duration<br />
within a six-week phase. In the absence of a recent<br />
performance, training intensity can usually be safely<br />
increased by about one to two seconds per 400<br />
metres of five to eight seconds per mile for each sixweek<br />
phase. Training mileage can be increased<br />
seven to ten miles every third week. Weekly increases<br />
in mileage or training intensity should be avoided<br />
to minimise the risk of injuries and overtraining.<br />
Esteve-Lanao, J.; Rhea, M. R.; Fleck, S. J.;<br />
Lucia, A.<br />
Running-specific, periodized strength training<br />
attenuates loss of stride length during<br />
intense endurance running<br />
The Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 22,<br />
(2008),<br />
4, pp. 1176-1183<br />
The purpose of this study was to determine the<br />
effects of a running-specific, periodised strength<br />
training program (performed over the specific period<br />
[8 weeks] of a 16-week macrocycle) on endurancetrained<br />
runners’ capacity to maintain stride length<br />
during running bouts at competitive speeds. Eighteen<br />
well-trained middle-distance runners completed<br />
the study (personal bests for 1500 and 5000 m<br />
of 3 minutes 57 seconds ± 12 seconds and 15 minutes<br />
24 seconds ± 36 seconds). They were randomly<br />
assigned to each of the following groups (6<br />
per group): periodised strength group, performing a<br />
periodised strength training program over the 8-<br />
week specific (intervention) period (2 sessions per<br />
week); nonperiodised strength group, performing<br />
the same strength training exercises as the periodised<br />
group over the specific period but with no<br />
week-to-week variations; and a control group, performing<br />
no strength training at all during the specific<br />
period. The percentage of loss in the stride length<br />
(cm)/speed (m/s) (SLS) ratio was measured by<br />
comparing<br />
the mean SLS during the first and third (last)<br />
group of the total repetitions, respectively, included<br />
in each of the interval training sessions performed at<br />
race speeds during the competition period that followed<br />
the specific period. Significant differences (p<br />
< 0.05) were found in mean percentage of SLS loss<br />
between the 3 study groups, with the periodised<br />
strength group showing no significant SLS change<br />
(0.36 ± 0.95%) and the 2 other groups showing a<br />
moderate or high SLS loss (-1.22 ± 1.5% and -3.05<br />
± 1.2% for the nonperiodised strength and control<br />
groups, respectively). In conclusion, periodised,<br />
running-specific strength training minimises the loss<br />
of stride length that typically occurs in endurance<br />
runners during fatiguing running bouts.<br />
Farwell, P.<br />
Multiple zone daily training<br />
Track and Field Coaches Review, 75, (2002), 2, pp. 14-15,<br />
18<br />
The concept of combined zone training (between<br />
AT and LT or between LT and VO2max) has been<br />
used with success, both to hit different paces (like<br />
10k pace at 92% VO2max) and to raise those<br />
thresholds. Another method of attacking all zones is<br />
to use the five-tier system exemplified in the Peter<br />
Coe or Joe Vigil methods. In a two-week period for<br />
a middle distance runner they focus separate workouts<br />
on 400, 800, 1500, 3k, and 5k paces, and<br />
when training longer distance runners, the range<br />
may emphasise 800, 1500, 3k, 5k, and 10k paces<br />
in each training block. Based on these systems, the<br />
author proposes his own system of purposely hitting<br />
multiple zones in one workout. In general, training<br />
in multiple zones means that the following training<br />
effects are achieved simultaneously: 1. continued<br />
aerobic conditioning, 2. increased strength and<br />
flexibility, 3. an increase of the lactate threshold, 4.<br />
heightened anaerobic efficiency for lactate buffering,<br />
6. improvement in running mechanics and efficiency,<br />
7. improved speed development as well as fast<br />
finishing (learning to kick), 8. ability to surge and the<br />
learning of some race tactics, 9. pace cognition,<br />
which is especially useful in cross-country running.<br />
Ferreira, R. L.; Rolim, R.<br />
The evolution of marathon training: A comparative<br />
analysis of elite runners’ training<br />
programmes<br />
New Studies in Athletics, 21, (2006), 1, pp. 29-37<br />
The world’s best performance for the men’s<br />
marathon has regularly stood for long periods but in<br />
Стр 122<br />
recent years, it has been regularly improved. At the<br />
same time, the focus of training methodology for<br />
long-distance runners has shifted from high volume<br />
workloads to workloads of less volume combined<br />
with higher intensity. In an effort to understand the<br />
changes, the authors examined training methodologies<br />
employed by the coaches of top-level male<br />
marathoners. Using a combination of face-to-face<br />
interviews and analysis of published training programmes,<br />
121