01.11.2014 Views

"Легкоатлетического вестника ИААФ" 4-2009 - Московский ...

"Легкоатлетического вестника ИААФ" 4-2009 - Московский ...

"Легкоатлетического вестника ИААФ" 4-2009 - Московский ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Средние и длинные дистанции<br />

day 5 – 3k pace – jog 1/4 the dist., i.e. 375m in 2:45<br />

min; day 7 – 800m pace – jog equal the dist., i.e.<br />

400m in 3 min; day 9 – 400m pace – jog double the<br />

dist., i.e. 700m, 600m, 500m, 400m, respectively.<br />

Horwill, F.<br />

Eighty years of systems coaching<br />

Track Coach, (Summer <strong>2009</strong>), 188, pp. 5997-6001<br />

The author describes the following coaching systems,<br />

developed for middle- and long-distance runners<br />

in detail: 1. The 1930s to 1940s: a) Guy Butler<br />

– under-race distance faster, over-distance slower,<br />

the race distance fast; b) A. V. Hill – the aerobic and<br />

anaerobic analysis of running events; c) Woldemar<br />

Gerschler – interval training; d) Gosta Holmer –<br />

fartlek training; 2. the 1940s to 1960s: a) Franz<br />

Stampfl – repetition running; b) Mih ly Igl i – “sets”<br />

of repetitions; 3. after 1960: a) Arthur Lydiard –<br />

marathon training for middle-distance runners; b)<br />

Percy Cerutti – sand hill training; c) Bill Bowerman –<br />

the progression-oriented Oregon system; d) Ernst<br />

Van Aaken – long, slow distance training; e) Frank<br />

Horwill – the five-pace system of training.<br />

Karp, J.<br />

Endurance training research<br />

Track and Field Coaches Review, 75, (2002), 3, pp. 18-21<br />

Training distance typically focuses on improving three<br />

main physiological variables – aerobic power<br />

(VO2max), lactate threshold, and running economy.<br />

The methods used to improve these variables are<br />

varied, and include everything from running long,<br />

slow distance to performing very short interval workouts.<br />

Although a high VO2max alone is not enough to<br />

attain elite-level performances, it gains one access<br />

into the club. An athlete cannot attain a high level of<br />

performance without a high VO2max. While VO2max<br />

is largely genetically determined training can improve<br />

it between 5 and 20% (depending on initial fitness<br />

level). It has been found that VO2max plateaus after<br />

only three weeks of daily training, and has been<br />

suggested<br />

that the training stimulus needs to increase<br />

every three weeks if further improvements in VO2max<br />

are to be realised. With long-term training programmes,<br />

VO2max tends to stabilise, with further<br />

improvements in fitness and performance resulting<br />

from improvements in lactate threshold and/or running<br />

economy. In fact, it is possible for VO2max to<br />

decrease over a period of years while racing performance<br />

continues to increase lending support to the<br />

greater importance of the other two factors. It is generally<br />

thought that long interval training (work periods<br />

of 2 min or longer) is the most potent stimulus for<br />

improving VO2max. However, the specific type of<br />

training to improve VO2max seems to be unimportant;<br />

it is the intensity of training that holds the most<br />

promise. The greatest changes in VO2max occur<br />

when the intensity of training is greater than 90%<br />

VO2max. The high mileage that distance runners typically<br />

run may improve the ability to run more repetitions<br />

during the interval training sessions, thus allowing<br />

more time to be spent at high intensity. Although<br />

VO2max has historically been the criterion measure of<br />

cardiovascular fitness, the lactate threshold explains<br />

more of the variability in performance between runners,<br />

and is the best physiological predictor of distance<br />

running performance. Furthermore, the lactate<br />

threshold is more responsive than VO2max to training,<br />

and is thus more useful for training purposes.<br />

Training the lactate threshold increases the speed at<br />

which lactate accumulates and acidosis takes place,<br />

thus allowing athletes to run at a higher percentage<br />

of their VO2max for a longer period of time. The<br />

longer the race athletes are training for, the more<br />

important it is to train their lactate threshold. The best<br />

way to focus on training the lactate threshold is by<br />

performing steady “tempo” runs, which should be<br />

run at, or slightly faster than, the athlete’s current lactate<br />

threshold pace. Economy is the oxygen cost of<br />

running at a given pace. The less oxygen a runner<br />

consumes to maintain a given pace, the more economical<br />

he or she is. Along with the running speed at<br />

the lactate threshold, running economy seems to be<br />

more important than VO2max in improving or predicting<br />

distance running performance. However, running<br />

economy seems to be the most difficult to target.<br />

Runners who perform the greatest volume of<br />

endurance training tend to be more economical, and<br />

also tend to run the fastest races. Thus, running high<br />

mileage (more than 70 miles per week) seems to<br />

improve running economy. Runners also tend to be<br />

the most economical at the speed at which they train<br />

the most. Therefore, athletes should spend time<br />

training at race pace in order to increase their economy<br />

at that pace. Recent studies have also shown an<br />

improved running economy with the inclusion of<br />

heavy weight training (3-5 sets of 3-5 reps to muscular<br />

failure at >90% 1RM) in the athletes’ programmes.<br />

While the variables associated with distance running<br />

performance are undoubtedly interrelated, the<br />

emphasis that is placed on each should depend on<br />

the athletes’ physiological strengths and weaknesses<br />

as well as the specific event for which the athlete is<br />

being trained. For instance, a middle distance runner<br />

should focus on improving VO2max, the velocity at<br />

VO2max, and anaerobic capacity, while a long distance<br />

runner should focus on improving lactate<br />

threshold and running economy.<br />

Karp, J. R.<br />

Training characteristics of U.S. Olympic<br />

marathon trials qualifiers<br />

Track Coach, (Winter 2007), 178, pp. 5693-5698; also in:<br />

New<br />

Studies in Athletics, 23, (2008), 2, pp. 31-37<br />

Two hundred and fifty-five athletes (104 men, 151<br />

women) qualified for the 2004 U.S. Olympic<br />

Marathon Trials by running 2:22:00 or faster (men)<br />

Стр 124<br />

and 2:48:00 or faster (women) within two years of<br />

the event. They were all given a questionnaire asking<br />

about their physical characteristics, training history,<br />

financial support, personal records for various<br />

distances, and training characteristics. All questions<br />

pertained to the entire year preceding the 2004<br />

Olympic trials. Ninety-three athletes (36.5%)<br />

123

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!