"ÐегкоаÑлеÑиÑеÑкого веÑÑника ÐÐÐФ" 4-2009 - ÐоÑковÑкий ...
"ÐегкоаÑлеÑиÑеÑкого веÑÑника ÐÐÐФ" 4-2009 - ÐоÑковÑкий ...
"ÐегкоаÑлеÑиÑеÑкого веÑÑника ÐÐÐФ" 4-2009 - ÐоÑковÑкий ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Средние и длинные дистанции<br />
day 5 – 3k pace – jog 1/4 the dist., i.e. 375m in 2:45<br />
min; day 7 – 800m pace – jog equal the dist., i.e.<br />
400m in 3 min; day 9 – 400m pace – jog double the<br />
dist., i.e. 700m, 600m, 500m, 400m, respectively.<br />
Horwill, F.<br />
Eighty years of systems coaching<br />
Track Coach, (Summer <strong>2009</strong>), 188, pp. 5997-6001<br />
The author describes the following coaching systems,<br />
developed for middle- and long-distance runners<br />
in detail: 1. The 1930s to 1940s: a) Guy Butler<br />
– under-race distance faster, over-distance slower,<br />
the race distance fast; b) A. V. Hill – the aerobic and<br />
anaerobic analysis of running events; c) Woldemar<br />
Gerschler – interval training; d) Gosta Holmer –<br />
fartlek training; 2. the 1940s to 1960s: a) Franz<br />
Stampfl – repetition running; b) Mih ly Igl i – “sets”<br />
of repetitions; 3. after 1960: a) Arthur Lydiard –<br />
marathon training for middle-distance runners; b)<br />
Percy Cerutti – sand hill training; c) Bill Bowerman –<br />
the progression-oriented Oregon system; d) Ernst<br />
Van Aaken – long, slow distance training; e) Frank<br />
Horwill – the five-pace system of training.<br />
Karp, J.<br />
Endurance training research<br />
Track and Field Coaches Review, 75, (2002), 3, pp. 18-21<br />
Training distance typically focuses on improving three<br />
main physiological variables – aerobic power<br />
(VO2max), lactate threshold, and running economy.<br />
The methods used to improve these variables are<br />
varied, and include everything from running long,<br />
slow distance to performing very short interval workouts.<br />
Although a high VO2max alone is not enough to<br />
attain elite-level performances, it gains one access<br />
into the club. An athlete cannot attain a high level of<br />
performance without a high VO2max. While VO2max<br />
is largely genetically determined training can improve<br />
it between 5 and 20% (depending on initial fitness<br />
level). It has been found that VO2max plateaus after<br />
only three weeks of daily training, and has been<br />
suggested<br />
that the training stimulus needs to increase<br />
every three weeks if further improvements in VO2max<br />
are to be realised. With long-term training programmes,<br />
VO2max tends to stabilise, with further<br />
improvements in fitness and performance resulting<br />
from improvements in lactate threshold and/or running<br />
economy. In fact, it is possible for VO2max to<br />
decrease over a period of years while racing performance<br />
continues to increase lending support to the<br />
greater importance of the other two factors. It is generally<br />
thought that long interval training (work periods<br />
of 2 min or longer) is the most potent stimulus for<br />
improving VO2max. However, the specific type of<br />
training to improve VO2max seems to be unimportant;<br />
it is the intensity of training that holds the most<br />
promise. The greatest changes in VO2max occur<br />
when the intensity of training is greater than 90%<br />
VO2max. The high mileage that distance runners typically<br />
run may improve the ability to run more repetitions<br />
during the interval training sessions, thus allowing<br />
more time to be spent at high intensity. Although<br />
VO2max has historically been the criterion measure of<br />
cardiovascular fitness, the lactate threshold explains<br />
more of the variability in performance between runners,<br />
and is the best physiological predictor of distance<br />
running performance. Furthermore, the lactate<br />
threshold is more responsive than VO2max to training,<br />
and is thus more useful for training purposes.<br />
Training the lactate threshold increases the speed at<br />
which lactate accumulates and acidosis takes place,<br />
thus allowing athletes to run at a higher percentage<br />
of their VO2max for a longer period of time. The<br />
longer the race athletes are training for, the more<br />
important it is to train their lactate threshold. The best<br />
way to focus on training the lactate threshold is by<br />
performing steady “tempo” runs, which should be<br />
run at, or slightly faster than, the athlete’s current lactate<br />
threshold pace. Economy is the oxygen cost of<br />
running at a given pace. The less oxygen a runner<br />
consumes to maintain a given pace, the more economical<br />
he or she is. Along with the running speed at<br />
the lactate threshold, running economy seems to be<br />
more important than VO2max in improving or predicting<br />
distance running performance. However, running<br />
economy seems to be the most difficult to target.<br />
Runners who perform the greatest volume of<br />
endurance training tend to be more economical, and<br />
also tend to run the fastest races. Thus, running high<br />
mileage (more than 70 miles per week) seems to<br />
improve running economy. Runners also tend to be<br />
the most economical at the speed at which they train<br />
the most. Therefore, athletes should spend time<br />
training at race pace in order to increase their economy<br />
at that pace. Recent studies have also shown an<br />
improved running economy with the inclusion of<br />
heavy weight training (3-5 sets of 3-5 reps to muscular<br />
failure at >90% 1RM) in the athletes’ programmes.<br />
While the variables associated with distance running<br />
performance are undoubtedly interrelated, the<br />
emphasis that is placed on each should depend on<br />
the athletes’ physiological strengths and weaknesses<br />
as well as the specific event for which the athlete is<br />
being trained. For instance, a middle distance runner<br />
should focus on improving VO2max, the velocity at<br />
VO2max, and anaerobic capacity, while a long distance<br />
runner should focus on improving lactate<br />
threshold and running economy.<br />
Karp, J. R.<br />
Training characteristics of U.S. Olympic<br />
marathon trials qualifiers<br />
Track Coach, (Winter 2007), 178, pp. 5693-5698; also in:<br />
New<br />
Studies in Athletics, 23, (2008), 2, pp. 31-37<br />
Two hundred and fifty-five athletes (104 men, 151<br />
women) qualified for the 2004 U.S. Olympic<br />
Marathon Trials by running 2:22:00 or faster (men)<br />
Стр 124<br />
and 2:48:00 or faster (women) within two years of<br />
the event. They were all given a questionnaire asking<br />
about their physical characteristics, training history,<br />
financial support, personal records for various<br />
distances, and training characteristics. All questions<br />
pertained to the entire year preceding the 2004<br />
Olympic trials. Ninety-three athletes (36.5%)<br />
123