09.11.2014 Views

Agricultural Drought Indices - US Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Drought Indices - US Department of Agriculture

Agricultural Drought Indices - US Department of Agriculture

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Limitations <strong>of</strong> <strong>Agricultural</strong> <strong>Drought</strong> <strong>Indices</strong> Used in the GHA Subregion<br />

<strong>Agricultural</strong> drought is by far the most complex and difficult type <strong>of</strong> drought to determine, compared<br />

to other drought types (meteorological and hydrological). In the sub-region, agricultural drought<br />

indices are determined only by rainfall data, despite recommendations that several parameters be<br />

considered. Although SPI can be computed for different time scales, provide early warning <strong>of</strong><br />

drought, and help assess drought severity, its values are based on preliminary data, which may<br />

change. With these limitations, the SPI is the best option for monitoring droughts for agriculture,<br />

given the nature <strong>of</strong> rainfall data available in the sub-region.<br />

Summary and Conclusions<br />

Meteorological drought occurs when the seasonal or annual precipitation falls below its long-term<br />

average. Hydrological drought develops when the meteorological drought is prolonged and<br />

causes shortage <strong>of</strong> surface and groundwater in the region. <strong>Agricultural</strong> drought is detected when<br />

continuous and intense soil moisture stress leads to significant crop yield reduction. Finally, socioeconomic<br />

drought is a manifestation <strong>of</strong> continued drought <strong>of</strong> severe intensity that causes economic<br />

and sociopolitical instabilities in a region or country. Whereas meteorological drought is just an<br />

indicator <strong>of</strong> precipitation deficiency, hydrological and agricultural droughts can be considered the<br />

physical manifestations <strong>of</strong> meteorological drought, and socioeconomic drought results from the<br />

impacts <strong>of</strong> hydrological and agricultural droughts on the society.<br />

This evaluation focused on all information related to drought assessment and monitoring,<br />

considering any time scale (10-day, monthly, and seasonal) and any format <strong>of</strong> publication (online<br />

data and maps, bulletins, advisories, etc). Rainfall anomaly data and maps, satellite information<br />

(NDVI), and meteorological and agricultural drought indices are considered in monitoring and<br />

disseminating drought information.<br />

The SPI has been used operationally to monitor conditions across the sub-region since 1989,<br />

when ICPAC was established as a regional drought monitoring center (DMC) in Nairobi. Dekadal,<br />

monthly, and seasonal maps <strong>of</strong> the SPI for the sub-region are provided operationally on the 8 th and<br />

28 th <strong>of</strong> the month and at the beginning <strong>of</strong> every season, respectively. The products are always<br />

posted on the ICPAC website (www.icpac.net) and also sent to National Meteorological and<br />

Hydrological Services (NMHSs) <strong>of</strong> the ICPAC member countries.<br />

References<br />

Edwards, D.C. and T. B. McKee. 1997. Characteristics <strong>of</strong> 20th century drought in the United States at<br />

multiple time scales. Climatology Report Number 97–2, Colorado State University, Fort Collins,<br />

Colorado.<br />

ICPAC. 1999. Homogeneous Climatological Zoning. DMC Lecture Notes, chapter 3, 29-43.<br />

IPCC. 2007a. Summary for Policymakers. In Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis.<br />

Contribution <strong>of</strong> Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report (AR4) <strong>of</strong> the Intergovernmental<br />

Panel on Climate Change (S. Solomon, D. Qin, M. Manning, Z. Chen, M. Marquis, K.B. Averyt,<br />

M.Tignor, and H.L. Miller, eds.). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.<br />

IPCC. 2007b. Fourth Assessment Report, Climate Change 2007 (AR4), Working Group II summary for policy<br />

makers.<br />

McKee, T.B., N.J. Doesken, and J. Kleist. 1993. The relationship <strong>of</strong> drought frequency and duration to time<br />

scales. Preprints, 8th Conference on Applied Climatology, pp. 179–184. January 17–22, Anaheim,<br />

California.<br />

Wilhite, D. 2000. <strong>Drought</strong> Preparedness in the <strong>US</strong>. Pages 119-132 in <strong>Drought</strong> and <strong>Drought</strong> Mitigation in<br />

Europe (J.V. Vogt and F. Somma, eds.). Kluwer, The Netherlands.<br />

112

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!