11.11.2014 Views

TABLE OF CONTENTS - Waratah-Wynyard Council

TABLE OF CONTENTS - Waratah-Wynyard Council

TABLE OF CONTENTS - Waratah-Wynyard Council

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Planning Authority<br />

11.2 The maximum building height is 7.5 metres. 11.2 Building height may be varied where it is<br />

demonstrated that buildings or structures are designed<br />

and sited in a manner that does not result in a high<br />

level of contrast with the prevailing landscape<br />

elements. Matters to be considered include the shape,<br />

height, bulk, materials and colours of buildings and<br />

structures, and their appearance in relation to skylines,<br />

and to existing and proposed vegetation.<br />

Planning Comments:<br />

It is noted that the above provisions are only applicable to the extent they do not conflict with the provisions<br />

contained in Schedule 22 in accordance with Clause 22.2.2. In that context, the setback provisions are considered<br />

to be applicable as there are no setback provisions in Schedule 22. The height provisions are not applicable as<br />

Schedule 22 provides standards with respect to height. Further, this standard is considered to apply with respect<br />

to setbacks as even a utility installation meets the definition of building under Part 4 of the Planning Scheme.<br />

The Whilst not a rural building, the facility<br />

The proposed fixed wireless facility is to be setback approximately 60 metres from Pages Rd and 15 metres from<br />

Preolenna Rd. It is setback in excess of 10 metres from other boundaries. Therefore reliance on the Performance<br />

Criteria 11.1 is sought with respect to the setback to Preolenna Rd.<br />

With respect to a) and b), there is another 15m high telecommunications monopole infrastructure facility within<br />

60 metres of the site, setback only 5 metres from Lapoinya Rd so the erection of a 30 m tower within 15 metres<br />

of a road setback is not out of context. Given that powerlines generally follow road corridors, it is not an<br />

unexpected view to see poles or towers from a road and therefore the proposal is considered to comply.<br />

With respect to C), the construction requires minimal earthworks to a small area of land and is considered<br />

acceptable.<br />

22.0 TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND INFRASTRUCTURE SCHEDULE<br />

22.1 PRINCIPLES<br />

22.1.1 (a) To accommodate the provision of telecommunications<br />

infrastructure to allow equitable access by all residents, whilst<br />

minimising the impact of such infrastructure on community values<br />

in accordance with the objectives of the Resource Management<br />

and Planning System.<br />

(b)<br />

(c)<br />

To encourage co-location and sharing of facilities, where such<br />

capacity exists, and where doing so will not compromise the<br />

objectives as stated in Appendix 1.<br />

To ensure proposals for the installation of telecommunications<br />

infrastructure form part of a local or regional network plan to<br />

enable consideration of the proposal on a broader and potentially<br />

regional basis.<br />

<strong>Waratah</strong>-<strong>Wynyard</strong> <strong>Council</strong> – Minutes Ordinary Meeting – 19 November 2012 – Page 365

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!