E - Iccat
E - Iccat
E - Iccat
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
DATA WORKSHOP - MADRID 2003<br />
tuna [Ref. 01-21] have a very recent history and have not been used yet to estimate unreported catches. However,<br />
the ICCAT Recommendations that established them contain important exemptions from reporting (e.g.,<br />
statistical document requirement only for frozen bigeye products, and bigeye tuna caught by purse seiners and<br />
pole and line (bait) vessels and destined principally for the canneries in the Convention area are not subject to the<br />
statistical document requirement), and thus their use may be limited.<br />
The Delegate of Japan noted that the submission of both the bi-annual reports from statistical documents and the<br />
annual report on farming data are essential in order to understand the full history of bluefin transactions. The<br />
BFTSD should indicate if the fish was farmed. He noted that only Japan and the United States have recently<br />
reported imports of bluefin, and questioned if this information was complete, as there are some other countries<br />
that import bluefin and then re-export it to Japan.<br />
Concern was expressed, particularly by the EC, about problems associated with the statistical document<br />
programs (e.g., unreliable information, false records, and/or no documents) and that these should be addressed<br />
before they are used as detailed scientific data. There are still many inconsistencies to resolve, especially<br />
regarding re-exports and transshipments. In the first stage, the EC Delegate proposed that the Contracting Parties<br />
exchange data beforehand to resolve these problems before utilizing the individual documents to validate the<br />
data on catches. The Delegate of Japan agreed that as a major importing country, they could provide individual<br />
records of imports (protecting any confidential information, as required) so that they could be crosschecked with<br />
the exporting fishing party.<br />
The Delegate of the EC expressed concern that this detailed level of checking could take substantial Secretariat<br />
resources. The Secretariat confirmed that the SCRS request for the detailed information from Statistical<br />
documents was intended to make global comparisons between Task I and export data, a task that can be<br />
performed with the current resources. However, a very detailed level of crosschecking of individual<br />
import/export transactions is beyond the current capabilities of the Secretariat.<br />
The Chairman noted that the Recommendation by ICCAT on Bluefin Tuna Farming [Ref. 02-10] might also<br />
serve as a crosschecking mechanism to improve total catch estimates for Mediterranean bluefin tuna. The<br />
Chairman added that, at the time of the Workshop, only one Contracting Party had submitted a farming report<br />
and thus it was too early to evaluate the performance of this instrument as a validation mechanism. The Delegate<br />
of the EC noted that there is a one-year delay, or longer, before ICCAT instruments can be implemented by the<br />
EC or by many other Contracting Parties. Therefore, it is expected that farming reports from the EC and other<br />
important farming countries in the Mediterranean will become available in 2004.<br />
The Workshop concluded that certain requirements in relation to the BFTSD should be reinforced to take better<br />
account of the concerns raised, in particular relating to farming (see [Ref. 02-10]) and re -export (see [Ref. 97-4]).<br />
Given the Swordfish and Bigeye Statistical Document Programs are based on the same template, they may share<br />
the same re-export concerns, which also need to be addressed. There is a need to simplify the documents and<br />
improve the reporting.<br />
6. Recommendations for improving the collection and reporting of catch data<br />
The Workshop endorsed all of the SCRS recommendations regarding data collection outlined in section 5 and<br />
Appendix 4 to ANNEX 4.3. The following are direct recommendations from the Workshop, some having<br />
financial implications for the Commission (i.e., ICCAT Manual, ICCAT research programs, scientific<br />
participation, and port sampling).<br />
6.1 Reliability of catch statistics<br />
ICCAT survey. The Commission should formalize the request for the completion of the ICCAT Survey on<br />
Statistic Collection Systems, which is now only on a voluntary basis. Of the more than 90 Parties believed to be<br />
fishing for tuna or tuna-like species in the ICCAT Convention area, only 17 returned completed questionnaires<br />
(seven replied stating that they did not operate tuna fis heries in the Convention area).<br />
Observer programs. In order to characterize the total catch composition across the full range of species in the<br />
Atlantic and Mediterranean, comprehensive at-sea observer data are essential. In the case of bluefin tuna<br />
farming, observers are needed both on the purse seiners and at the cages. Logbooks are essential, but because of<br />
the self-reporting nature, must be augmented with observer data.<br />
121