16.11.2014 Views

Andrea Langlois et al - Islands of Resistance - Pirate Radio in Canada

Andrea Langlois et al - Islands of Resistance - Pirate Radio in Canada

Andrea Langlois et al - Islands of Resistance - Pirate Radio in Canada

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

40 • islands <strong>of</strong> resistance<br />

Politic<strong>al</strong> statements were equ<strong>al</strong>ly as likely to garner compla<strong>in</strong>ts and<br />

<strong>in</strong>fluence decisions over what materi<strong>al</strong> was suitable to be broadcast.<br />

For example, CKGB <strong>in</strong> Timm<strong>in</strong>s, Ontario, had <strong>al</strong>lowed the Communist<br />

Party to broadcast as a part <strong>of</strong> its schedule, tak<strong>in</strong>g advantage <strong>of</strong><br />

the leeway <strong>al</strong>lowed by the CBC for loc<strong>al</strong> stations to approve politic<strong>al</strong><br />

speeches. As noted <strong>in</strong> a l<strong>et</strong>ter from Thos. Lawrence, Secr<strong>et</strong>ary <strong>of</strong> the<br />

Northern Ontario Region<strong>al</strong> Committee <strong>of</strong> the Communist Party <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Canada</strong>, to Gladstone Murray <strong>of</strong> the CBC, CKGB’s station manager,<br />

Mr. W. Wren withdrew permission and term<strong>in</strong>ated a previous agreement<br />

to <strong>al</strong>low the Communist Party on the air. Lawrence noted that<br />

Wren expla<strong>in</strong>ed, “It is difficult to <strong>in</strong>terpr<strong>et</strong> the rules and regulations<br />

<strong>of</strong> the CBC particularly <strong>in</strong> regard to politic<strong>al</strong> speeches. Furthermore,<br />

the onus for the pass<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> such speeches rests on the loc<strong>al</strong> station . . .<br />

We have received compla<strong>in</strong>ts from certa<strong>in</strong> people regard<strong>in</strong>g Communist<br />

broadcasts.” 13 In this case, compla<strong>in</strong>ts from listeners provided the<br />

imp<strong>et</strong>us or excuse for change despite the <strong>al</strong>lowances <strong>in</strong> policy.<br />

Conflicts over content, loc<strong>al</strong> priorities, language and the ability to<br />

conform to nation<strong>al</strong> n<strong>et</strong>work radio policies cont<strong>in</strong>ued to spark resistance<br />

<strong>in</strong> every region <strong>of</strong> <strong>Canada</strong>. There were ongo<strong>in</strong>g disputes over<br />

language — start<strong>in</strong>g with compla<strong>in</strong>ts about French-language broadcasts<br />

<strong>in</strong> the West over CRBC and English <strong>in</strong> Quebec, as well as those<br />

language bans dur<strong>in</strong>g the Second World War mentioned above. Loc<strong>al</strong><br />

and region<strong>al</strong> priorities, such as those <strong>in</strong> Moose Jaw, <strong>al</strong>so cont<strong>in</strong>ued to<br />

mark the Canadian experience <strong>of</strong> radio. Once broadcast<strong>in</strong>g patterns<br />

were formed <strong>in</strong> the Canadian South, and CBC n<strong>et</strong>work radio and television<br />

were expanded to the North through the Anik satellite <strong>in</strong> the<br />

1970s, new forms <strong>of</strong> resistance arose. Illeg<strong>al</strong> stations, unauthorized<br />

broadcasts <strong>in</strong> Inuktitut, broadcasts from <strong>Radio</strong> Moscow and other<br />

makeshift arrangements to me<strong>et</strong> loc<strong>al</strong> needs defied regulation, even<br />

co-opt<strong>in</strong>g some CBC n<strong>et</strong>work staff <strong>in</strong> the process. 14<br />

Listener <strong>Resistance</strong><br />

The implementation <strong>of</strong> licens<strong>in</strong>g was not relegated to the stations<br />

themselves, but was <strong>al</strong>so extended to receivers. A little known part <strong>of</strong><br />

Canadian radio history is that the <strong>Radio</strong>telegraph Act <strong>al</strong>so required<br />

listeners who owned a radio s<strong>et</strong> to pay a fee <strong>of</strong> one dollar a year to listen<br />

(broadcasters paid 50 dollars for their licences). The radio receiv<strong>in</strong>g<br />

licence fee was raised to two dollars <strong>in</strong> 1932 and $2.50 <strong>in</strong> 1938

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!