22.11.2014 Views

Disaster Risk Reduction in School Curricula: Case Studies ... - Unicef

Disaster Risk Reduction in School Curricula: Case Studies ... - Unicef

Disaster Risk Reduction in School Curricula: Case Studies ... - Unicef

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

36<br />

Section 6.<br />

<strong>Disaster</strong> <strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Reduction</strong> Learn<strong>in</strong>g:<br />

Assessment of Students<br />

In Georgia (case study 2) a mixture of what are called determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g<br />

assessment and develop<strong>in</strong>g assessment are used for DRR<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong> formal learn<strong>in</strong>g programmes but only the latter is<br />

used to determ<strong>in</strong>e student needs and progress <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>formal<br />

but nonetheless mandated Head of Class Hour programme.<br />

In Kazakhstan (case study 3) self-assessment and peer<br />

assessment are used for formative purposes and multiple-choice<br />

tests for summative purposes. A balanced assessment system<br />

comb<strong>in</strong>ed with recommended portfolio style diversity <strong>in</strong><br />

assessment approach is on hand <strong>in</strong> New Zealand (case study 18)<br />

but teacher feedback suggests m<strong>in</strong>imal take-up.<br />

Clearly, there is a case to be made for the development of more<br />

imag<strong>in</strong>ative and <strong>in</strong>novative forms of assessment of student<br />

learn<strong>in</strong>g under DRR curricula. If knowledge, skills, attitud<strong>in</strong>al/<br />

dispositional and behavioural learn<strong>in</strong>g outcomes matter then<br />

appropriate assessment forms need to be considered <strong>in</strong> order<br />

to illum<strong>in</strong>ate the actual extent of the realization of these outcomes.<br />

This is suggestive of the widespread application of the portfolio<br />

approach as described above, used for both formative and<br />

summative purposes. Formative assessment modalities,<br />

such as self- and peer assessment, are also consonant with the<br />

embrace of <strong>in</strong>teractive and participatory learn<strong>in</strong>g and the child<br />

participation dimensions of the Convention on the Rights<br />

of the Child.<br />

Potential challenges <strong>in</strong> the <strong>in</strong>troduction of portfolio assessment<br />

are its time and resource implications; it takes longer and costs<br />

more, as Malawi has experienced (case study 15). Time and<br />

resource <strong>in</strong>vestment <strong>in</strong> assessment merits more attention<br />

by DRR education proponents. Ways to <strong>in</strong>tegrate assessment<br />

<strong>in</strong>to the flow of the learn<strong>in</strong>g process should, <strong>in</strong> particular,<br />

be explored as a way forward.<br />

<strong>Disaster</strong> risk reduction curriculum development and <strong>in</strong>tegration<br />

will rema<strong>in</strong> an <strong>in</strong>complete project unless student learn<strong>in</strong>g<br />

assessment is more comprehensively addressed. The choice<br />

of what to assess expresses a curriculum’s priorities both<br />

explicitly and implicitly<br />

<strong>Disaster</strong> <strong>Risk</strong> <strong>Reduction</strong> <strong>in</strong> <strong>School</strong> <strong>Curricula</strong>: <strong>Case</strong> <strong>Studies</strong> from Thirty Countries

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!