25.12.2014 Views

Sustainable Construction A Life Cycle Approach in Engineering

Sustainable Construction A Life Cycle Approach in Engineering

Sustainable Construction A Life Cycle Approach in Engineering

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 17: Toughness Index – Effect of fibre type<br />

Effect of fibre volume<br />

Figure 16 <strong>in</strong>dicates an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> toughness with <strong>in</strong>creased volume fraction, for the various fibres<br />

used. The <strong>in</strong>creases <strong>in</strong> toughness with volume fraction, is attributed to the <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> the<br />

fibres <strong>in</strong> the matrix and across cracks.<br />

Effect of fibre type<br />

A representation of the toughness <strong>in</strong>dexes of the various test specimens for vary<strong>in</strong>g volume fraction<br />

is given <strong>in</strong> Fig. 17. Trends attributed to fibre geometry can be observed. For all volume<br />

fractions, IFCA (hooked ended fibres, l/d: 79) mixes demonstrated the highest toughness. This<br />

was followed by TFRC (shredded tyre fibres, l/d: 132) and IFCB (hooked ended fibres, l/d: 50)<br />

mixes. IFCC (crimped fibres, l/d: 50) mixes exhibited the lowest level of toughness.<br />

In compar<strong>in</strong>g fibre profiles, hooked ended fibres (IFCA, IFCB) <strong>in</strong>dicated higher toughness<br />

than crimped fibres (IFCC). Shredded tyre fibres showed higher levels of toughness than<br />

crimped fibres, and hooked ended fibres with an aspect ratio of 50. The profile of shredded tyre<br />

fibres is rather random and non-uniform. The twisted nature of the shredded fibres potentially<br />

contributes for enhanced anchorage and bond<strong>in</strong>g with the matrix.<br />

In compar<strong>in</strong>g IFCA (hooked ended fibres, l/d: 79) and IFCB (hooked ended fibres, l/d: 50),<br />

an <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> aspect ratio resulted <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>creased toughness.<br />

4 CONCLUSIONS<br />

For the various types of fibres used <strong>in</strong> the mixes, the addition of fibres to the matrix resulted <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>creased compressive strength. The ga<strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong> strength <strong>in</strong> general <strong>in</strong>creased as the volume fraction<br />

of the fibres added was <strong>in</strong>creased. However the strength obta<strong>in</strong>ed for TFRC-2.0, was lower than<br />

the strength obta<strong>in</strong>ed for TFRC-1.5. The highest strengths were obta<strong>in</strong>ed for IFCA mixes (Dramix<br />

RC-80/30-BP) for volume fractions 1.0% and 2.0%. This was attributed to the aspect ratio<br />

of these fibres, which was significantly higher than the aspect ratio of the other fibres.<br />

Flexural tensile strength tests for all mixes <strong>in</strong>dicate that the addition of fibres to the fresh mix<br />

<strong>in</strong>creased the ductility of the composite <strong>in</strong> the hardened stage. An <strong>in</strong>crease <strong>in</strong> peak strength was<br />

also recorded. Failure of all specimens was due to fibre slippage rather than yield<strong>in</strong>g of the fibre<br />

re<strong>in</strong>forcement.<br />

87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!