29.12.2014 Views

(Blue Diamond Road) Corridor Study - Regional Transportation ...

(Blue Diamond Road) Corridor Study - Regional Transportation ...

(Blue Diamond Road) Corridor Study - Regional Transportation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

8. Estimated System Costs RTC SR-160 <strong>Corridor</strong> <strong>Study</strong><br />

As under Alternative 1, annual service hours for each route alternative are a direct reflection<br />

of the route length, peak service frequency, and operating speed of each route. For<br />

Alternative 2, this means that the most service hours are associated with the express route<br />

operating at 15 minute peak frequencies. On a cost basis, however, the higher cost per<br />

hour results in the BRT route being the most expensive to operate.<br />

8.2.4 Summary/Conclusions<br />

Alternative 2 alternatives represent an overall lower level of investment than Alternative 1<br />

alternatives in each of the three key years of investment – 2008, 2015, and 2025. The<br />

delay of BRT implementation and one less local route under Alternative 2 build-out in 2025<br />

result in a 34% lower overall operating cost impact than the Alternative 1 2025 alternative.<br />

The difference between the two alternatives is even greater in 2008 with Alternative 1 being<br />

85% more costly to operate than Alternative 2 which includes a single express route as<br />

opposed to both an express and local route in Alternative 1. However, the 2008 Alternative<br />

2 alternative provides no north-south connectivity to the current CAT system west of I-15<br />

whereas Alternative 1 connects to the current CAT system along Rainbow Boulevard<br />

Additionally, the higher initial investment under Alternative 1 results in less growth in<br />

operating costs from 2008 to 2015, and 2008 to 2025 at 48 percent and 116 percent<br />

respectively than under Alternative 2 where costs are estimated to grow by 86 percent from<br />

2008 to 2015, and by 163 percent from 2008 to 2025. Cost growth is a direct reflection of<br />

the number of service hours provided under each option as shown in EXHIBIT 8-8.<br />

EXHIBIT 8-8: Comparison of Vehicle Service Hours<br />

Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Alternative 2 Alternative 2 Alternative 2<br />

Service Hours<br />

(2025) (2015) (2025) (2015) (2015) (2025)<br />

Bus Service Hours 58,953 71,779 112,092 36,296 67,717 80,876<br />

8-11

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!