29.12.2014 Views

(Blue Diamond Road) Corridor Study - Regional Transportation ...

(Blue Diamond Road) Corridor Study - Regional Transportation ...

(Blue Diamond Road) Corridor Study - Regional Transportation ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

5. Alternative Development RTC SR-160 <strong>Corridor</strong> <strong>Study</strong><br />

centers. Because of traffic interference problems caused by an at-grade fixed guideway<br />

system, SR-160 is determined not to suitable for a fixed guideway system. Also due to lack<br />

of connectivity with the planned regional rail network, cross-town alignments are more<br />

appropriate for light rail only if planned in conjunction with one or more radial alignments.<br />

The cross-town alignments are, therefore, determined to be sufficiently served by enhanced<br />

conventional bus transit and are not appropriate for consideration for light rail for the<br />

planning time horizon of this study.<br />

5.3.2 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)<br />

As described in the previous section, alignments that are appropriate for BRT are alignments<br />

that include:<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Right-of-way that can accommodate exclusive sections for queue jumpers or<br />

exclusive lanes,<br />

Medium to high demand for transit service, and<br />

Nodes with pedestrian access to activity centers and intense development.<br />

Radial alignments that provide access to SR-160 are appropriate for consideration for fixed<br />

route local, express, and BRT routes. Rainbow Drive, Decatur Boulevard, and Las Vegas<br />

Boulevard South serve multiple residential and retail centers and several large casinos.<br />

None of the radial alignments that connect to SR-160 have the distribution of population<br />

and activity centers to justify exclusive lanes, with the possible exception of Decatur<br />

Boulevard and, in the near term, Las Vegas Boulevard South. Over the long term, RTC<br />

considers Las Vegas Boulevard South a suitable candidate for exclusive BRT.<br />

With the exception of SR-160, the cross-town alignments have minimal demand to support<br />

frequent transit services associated with BRT. Of the cross-town alignments, only SR-160<br />

has the right-of-way space to support a BRT line, but SR-160 lacks pedestrian access to<br />

concentrations of population, employment, or activity to warrant a significant investment in<br />

transit infrastructure. The linkage between pedestrian amenities and transit ridership<br />

creates a motivation for planners to improve pedestrian infrastructure for corridors where<br />

transit investments are desired. Such improvements include revised street standards,<br />

revised urban design guidelines, landscaping, siting of building façades and entrances<br />

toward the street, and the installation of pedestrian pathways.<br />

5.3.3 Conventional Bus Transit<br />

Conventional bus transit service, both local and express service, may be appropriate<br />

solutions for certain alignments.<br />

5-12

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!