(Blue Diamond Road) Corridor Study - Regional Transportation ...
(Blue Diamond Road) Corridor Study - Regional Transportation ...
(Blue Diamond Road) Corridor Study - Regional Transportation ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
5. Alternative Development RTC SR-160 <strong>Corridor</strong> <strong>Study</strong><br />
centers. Because of traffic interference problems caused by an at-grade fixed guideway<br />
system, SR-160 is determined not to suitable for a fixed guideway system. Also due to lack<br />
of connectivity with the planned regional rail network, cross-town alignments are more<br />
appropriate for light rail only if planned in conjunction with one or more radial alignments.<br />
The cross-town alignments are, therefore, determined to be sufficiently served by enhanced<br />
conventional bus transit and are not appropriate for consideration for light rail for the<br />
planning time horizon of this study.<br />
5.3.2 Bus Rapid Transit (BRT)<br />
As described in the previous section, alignments that are appropriate for BRT are alignments<br />
that include:<br />
<br />
<br />
<br />
Right-of-way that can accommodate exclusive sections for queue jumpers or<br />
exclusive lanes,<br />
Medium to high demand for transit service, and<br />
Nodes with pedestrian access to activity centers and intense development.<br />
Radial alignments that provide access to SR-160 are appropriate for consideration for fixed<br />
route local, express, and BRT routes. Rainbow Drive, Decatur Boulevard, and Las Vegas<br />
Boulevard South serve multiple residential and retail centers and several large casinos.<br />
None of the radial alignments that connect to SR-160 have the distribution of population<br />
and activity centers to justify exclusive lanes, with the possible exception of Decatur<br />
Boulevard and, in the near term, Las Vegas Boulevard South. Over the long term, RTC<br />
considers Las Vegas Boulevard South a suitable candidate for exclusive BRT.<br />
With the exception of SR-160, the cross-town alignments have minimal demand to support<br />
frequent transit services associated with BRT. Of the cross-town alignments, only SR-160<br />
has the right-of-way space to support a BRT line, but SR-160 lacks pedestrian access to<br />
concentrations of population, employment, or activity to warrant a significant investment in<br />
transit infrastructure. The linkage between pedestrian amenities and transit ridership<br />
creates a motivation for planners to improve pedestrian infrastructure for corridors where<br />
transit investments are desired. Such improvements include revised street standards,<br />
revised urban design guidelines, landscaping, siting of building façades and entrances<br />
toward the street, and the installation of pedestrian pathways.<br />
5.3.3 Conventional Bus Transit<br />
Conventional bus transit service, both local and express service, may be appropriate<br />
solutions for certain alignments.<br />
5-12