(Blue Diamond Road) Corridor Study - Regional Transportation ...
(Blue Diamond Road) Corridor Study - Regional Transportation ...
(Blue Diamond Road) Corridor Study - Regional Transportation ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
4. Evaluation Methodology RTC SR-160 <strong>Corridor</strong> <strong>Study</strong><br />
Exhibit 4-1 provides a conceptual overview of the carrying capacity of major mass transit<br />
alternatives. Because of its high per mile capital costs, heavy rail (subway) and elevated<br />
rail systems are considered feasible only in central business districts (CBDs) in dense<br />
populated metropolitan regions where a substantial share of commute trips are bound for<br />
the central city. Generally, subways are considered only for regions where transit demand<br />
exceeds 15,000 passengers per hour. In regions where heavy rail is not considered a<br />
feasible alternative, transit agencies have invested in Light Rail Transit (LRT) systems which<br />
operate largely at-grade on city streets.<br />
Like heavy rail, LRT systems are typically retrofitted into high-density urban corridors where<br />
high transit demand cannot be sufficiently met by existing fixed route bus services and the<br />
expected benefit in new ridership justifies the economic costs of the fixed investment. Light<br />
rail system typically carry anywhere between 5,000 and 12,000 passengers per hour. Rarely<br />
are LRT systems considered suitable for corridors that currently possess daily ridership<br />
below 3,000 passengers per day, unless enough commercial development is anticipated.<br />
Where anticipated ridership levels are not high enough to justify a fixed guideway rail<br />
investment, transit planners have turned to an array of rubber-tire bus rapid transit (BRT)<br />
technologies. BRT systems have increased in popularity because they offer flexible options<br />
that can be scaled upward at comparatively lower marginal fixed costs to meet growing<br />
demand.<br />
4-5