30.12.2014 Views

FM 17-98 SCOUT PLATOON

FM 17-98 SCOUT PLATOON

FM 17-98 SCOUT PLATOON

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

• Models that depict the enemy’s available COAs. These are normally produced in the form of situation<br />

developments; they may include associated matrices and/or text descriptions.<br />

• Event templates and related matrices to focus the R&S effort.<br />

FRIENDLY COA DEVELOPMENT AND WAR-GAMING<br />

During threat COA development, the staff concurrently develops friendly COAs based on the facts and assumptions<br />

identified during IPB and mission analysis. Incorporating the results of IPB into COA development ensures that each<br />

friendly COA takes into account the opportunities and limitations related to the environment and the threat situation.<br />

During the war-gaming session, the staff fights the set of threat COAs, developed in step 4 of the IPB process, against<br />

each potential friendly COA. Targeting conferences often accompany or follow the war-gaming session to refine<br />

selected high-value targets (HVT) from the enemy COA models into high-priority targets (HPT) that support the<br />

friendly COAs.<br />

Based on the results of war-gaming, the staff takes the following actions to finalize the COA development process:<br />

• Construct a decision support template (DST) and its associated matrix.<br />

• Identify information requirements for each COA.<br />

• Refine enemy COA models and event templates (and their related matrices), focusing on the intelligence<br />

required to execute the friendly COAs.<br />

• For each threat COA, determine the probability that the enemy will adopt it.<br />

• Identify the most dangerous threat COA.<br />

After deciding on a COA and issuing orders, the commander approves a list of information requirements; he identifies<br />

the most important of these as the final PIR. During execution of the operation, emerging intelligence will confirm or<br />

deny the assumptions and information identified during the initial IPB.<br />

The S2 continues to evaluate the situation and update the commander and staff. As necessary, he performs parts of the<br />

IPB process to support new iterations of the decision-making process. Refer to Figures 2-2, 2-3, and 2-4 for examples<br />

of the templates developed during IPB and the war-gaming of friendly COAs.<br />

Figure 2-2. Example situational template.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!