- Page 1 and 2: Bulletin TAS CAS Bulletin 1 / 2012
- Page 3 and 4: Arbitration CAS 2011/O/2422 .......
- Page 5 and 6: “ Sports law ”: implications fo
- Page 7 and 8: and procedures of the CAS 10 . The
- Page 9 and 10: 2. Considering the plenary power of
- Page 11 and 12: over the emerging game of indoor so
- Page 13 and 14: appeals arbitration proceedings, ab
- Page 15 and 16: troubling because . . . United Stat
- Page 17 and 18: La médiation : processus et applic
- Page 19 and 20: Ainsi, la solution au confl it éma
- Page 21 and 22: voir sa demande profonde comprise :
- Page 23 and 24: pour les parties elles-mêmes. Cell
- Page 25 and 26: divergent sur l’exécution (mer/m
- Page 27: Ces deux grands courants font l’o
- Page 31 and 32: mémoires déposés par les parties
- Page 33 and 34: d’un règlement d’obtenir un av
- Page 35 and 36: • une brève description des moye
- Page 37 and 38: R64.2 (…) R65 Appels contre des d
- Page 39 and 40: written comments and shall give bri
- Page 41 and 42: his own discretion, the questions s
- Page 43 and 44: strong links between the two 1 . In
- Page 45 and 46: According to Article 17.4 “If any
- Page 47 and 48: Finally, in the absence of other de
- Page 49 and 50: epresentative (Respondent) argued t
- Page 51 and 52: Figure 2: Orders on language in CAS
- Page 53 and 54: litiges pouvant être soumis à la
- Page 55 and 56: au lien du litige en cause avec le
- Page 57 and 58: Contrairement aux autres institutio
- Page 59 and 60: coûts doivent être raisonnables 4
- Page 61 and 62: Investigating magistrate no. 31 of
- Page 63 and 64: 2. Proper Defendants Article 282 of
- Page 65 and 66: interference by state courts) with
- Page 67 and 68: against doping in sports. To achiev
- Page 69 and 70: Arbitration CAS 2010/A/2091 Dennis
- Page 71 and 72: had stated that his claim had been
- Page 73 and 74: effectiveness and validity of that
- Page 75 and 76: another players’ agent (…) oper
- Page 77 and 78: Beitar FC. In the Appellant’s vie
- Page 79 and 80:
The referred letter, in its pertine
- Page 81 and 82:
8. Condemn the Respondent to the pa
- Page 83 and 84:
It is clear for the Panel that the
- Page 85 and 86:
damage. There is wilful damage when
- Page 87 and 88:
in the determination of the compens
- Page 89 and 90:
Arbitration TAS 2010/A/2220 Corina
- Page 91 and 92:
En date du 27 août 2010, l’Appel
- Page 93 and 94:
2010, le droit de Greffe acquitté
- Page 95 and 96:
Il relève en effet que leur versio
- Page 97 and 98:
Arbitration C AS 2010/A/2275 Croati
- Page 99 and 100:
of golf clubs in Croatia had withdr
- Page 101 and 102:
(depending upon the translation) th
- Page 103 and 104:
waiting until the eve of the AGM 20
- Page 105 and 106:
provisional suspension and also to
- Page 107 and 108:
that it did not have any particular
- Page 109 and 110:
c) The resolution fi le dated Febru
- Page 111 and 112:
2011, Art. 156 no. 11 ff) if the ev
- Page 113 and 114:
Article 293 UCI ADR determines the
- Page 115 and 116:
The Decision seems to be based on t
- Page 117 and 118:
clenbuterol can only have entered t
- Page 119 and 120:
- how the Prohibited Substance ente
- Page 121 and 122:
entry into his system of the Prohib
- Page 123 and 124:
which will be addressed in detail b
- Page 125 and 126:
in those countries is rampant. Sinc
- Page 127 and 128:
as high as 1 out of 100 slaughtered
- Page 129 and 130:
athletes having tested positive to
- Page 131 and 132:
illustrate that his blood values ar
- Page 133 and 134:
specifi c gravity of 1.020. Without
- Page 135 and 136:
values of subjects that did not und
- Page 137 and 138:
urine tests performed the evenings
- Page 139 and 140:
WADA that the calculations regardin
- Page 141 and 142:
One of the reasons for that could b
- Page 143 and 144:
ingested by him was contaminated wi
- Page 145 and 146:
The Athlete refers the Panel to the
- Page 147 and 148:
athlete but withdrawn once the time
- Page 149 and 150:
The USOC argues that the IOC Regula
- Page 151 and 152:
period of ineligibility (non-partic
- Page 153 and 154:
Arbitrage TAS 2011/A/2433 Amadou Di
- Page 155 and 156:
précisions sur les offres que le Q
- Page 157 and 158:
estrictions, non, entre les comité
- Page 159 and 160:
En date du 3 février 2011, la Comm
- Page 161 and 162:
II 271; H.M. RIEMER, Berner Komment
- Page 163 and 164:
onne foi et de respect de la procé
- Page 165 and 166:
son exploitation mais, comme observ
- Page 167 and 168:
des droits de la personnalité. L
- Page 169 and 170:
ne peut que prendre note de remarqu
- Page 171 and 172:
En l’espèce, celui qui cherchait
- Page 173 and 174:
évidence le fait que leur “condu
- Page 175 and 176:
toute activité liée au football
- Page 177 and 178:
Extracts from the legal fi ndings A
- Page 179 and 180:
Arbitration CAS 2011/O/2574 Union o
- Page 181 and 182:
SFL Appeals Tribunal of 29 July 201
- Page 183 and 184:
its position on OLA’s request for
- Page 185 and 186:
- production par la fondation du co
- Page 187 and 188:
(iii) To confi rm that OLA is not e
- Page 189 and 190:
CCP. The substantive validity of th
- Page 191 and 192:
2.2 Article R46 (1) of the CAS Code
- Page 193 and 194:
constitutive of an abuse of a domin
- Page 195 and 196:
Claimant to indicate its prayers fo
- Page 197 and 198:
It results from the above that UEFA
- Page 199 and 200:
The UEL 2011/2012 is an internation
- Page 201 and 202:
The Panel considers that the sancti
- Page 203 and 204:
- discriminate OLA pursuant to Arti
- Page 205 and 206:
Appellant requested the matter be d
- Page 207 and 208:
The Panel is satisfi ed that the Bu
- Page 209 and 210:
E. Conclusion In summary, the Panel
- Page 211 and 212:
Appellant described as caffeine pil
- Page 213 and 214:
apply the various regulations of FI
- Page 215 and 216:
in doping matters is to be upheld w
- Page 217 and 218:
* * 4A_404/2010 Judgment of 19 Apri
- Page 219 and 220:
BGG; Jean-Maurice Frésard, in Comm
- Page 221 and 222:
Art. 2.1 of the Statutes of Respond
- Page 223 and 224:
validity, namely with regard to its
- Page 225 and 226:
that he is a Turkish citizen, who p
- Page 227 and 228:
in the provisions of any other serv
- Page 229 and 230:
Respondent had their domicile, seat
- Page 231 and 232:
evidential submission took place ti
- Page 233 and 234:
un contrôle antidopage ou à l’a
- Page 235 and 236:
essortissant à la conception suiss
- Page 237 and 238:
4A_428/2011 Arrêt du 13 février 2
- Page 239 and 240:
interdiction d’exécuter les sanc
- Page 241 and 242:
Il leur a cependant échappé que c
- Page 243 and 244:
éférence (arrêt 4A_246/2011 du 7
- Page 245 and 246:
l’AMA entendait tirer de la Conve
- Page 247 and 248:
4A_652/2011 Arrêt du 7 mars 2012 I
- Page 249:
Publications récentes relatives au