(CAS) Bulletin - Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / TAS

More documents

Recommendations

Info

glance, a formal issue, it might affect the costs and the conduct of the procedure in general. Indeed, the choice of the language can affect the costs of the entire procedure as it might entail signifi cant translation costs for one party or the other as well as signifi cant loss of time in order to get the translations; Figure 1: List of orders on language issued by CAS 1. 2005/A/838 2. 2005/A/950 3. 2005/A/973 4. 2005/A/983 5. 2005/A/984 6. 2005/A/1003 7. 2006/A/1015 8. 2006/A/1075 9. 2006/A/1095 10. 2006/A/1155 11. 2006/A/1163 12. 2006/A/1180 13. 2006/A/1181 14. 2007/A/1232 * Data available up until April 2012 List of all registered cases where orders on language were issued * 15. 2007/A/1290 16. 2007/A/1388 & 1389 17. 2008/A/1611 18. 2008/A/1630 19. 2008/A/1661 20. 2008/A/1667 21. 2008/A/1677 22. 2008/A/1680 23. 2008/O/1689 24. 2008/A/1727 25. 2009/A/1756 26. 2009/A/1764 27. 2008/A/1828 28. 2008/A/1829 furthermore, priority given to one language may also engender issues related to the fairness of the procedure. What is more, the language chosen often refl ects the legal tradition of the country concerned, and from this scope, it might have an impact on the outcome of the dispute. 29. 2008/A/1868 30. 2009/A/1957 31. 2009/A/1975 32. 2009/A/1976 & 1977 33. 2009/A/2075 34. 2010/A/2306 35. 2011/A/2615 36. 2011/A/2618 37. 2011/A/2620 38. 2012/O/2722 39. 2012/O/2722 40. 2012/A/2739 Articles et commentaires / Articles and commentaries - 47
Figure 2: Orders on language in CAS procedures Orders on language + appointment of arbitrator: 1 Figure 3: Language of the proceedings before CAS * Orders on language (registered cases): 40 Orders on language + provisional measures: 1 Orders on language in cases terminated: 5 English 1836 French Spanish German Italian 2000 1500 1000 Language of procedure Percentage * Indicative table based on the number of registered cases from the creation of CAS in 1984 up to April 20, 2011. 500 0 551 130 29 19 72% 21% 5% 1% 1% Orders on language + control of admissibility: 1 Articles et commentaires / Articles and commentaries - 48
Page 1 and 2: Bulletin TAS CAS Bulletin 1 / 2012
Page 3 and 4: Arbitration CAS 2011/O/2422 .......
Page 5 and 6: “ Sports law ”: implications fo
Page 7 and 8: and procedures of the CAS 10 . The
Page 9 and 10: 2. Considering the plenary power of
Page 11 and 12: over the emerging game of indoor so
Page 13 and 14: appeals arbitration proceedings, ab
Page 15 and 16: troubling because . . . United Stat
Page 17 and 18: La médiation : processus et applic
Page 19 and 20: Ainsi, la solution au confl it éma
Page 21 and 22: voir sa demande profonde comprise :
Page 23 and 24: pour les parties elles-mêmes. Cell
Page 25 and 26: divergent sur l’exécution (mer/m
Page 27 and 28: Ces deux grands courants font l’o
Page 29 and 30: peine de retomber rapidement dans u
Page 31 and 32: mémoires déposés par les parties
Page 33 and 34: d’un règlement d’obtenir un av
Page 35 and 36: • une brève description des moye
Page 37 and 38: R64.2 (…) R65 Appels contre des d
Page 39 and 40: written comments and shall give bri
Page 41 and 42: his own discretion, the questions s
Page 43 and 44: strong links between the two 1 . In
Page 45 and 46: According to Article 17.4 “If any
Page 47 and 48: Finally, in the absence of other de
Page 49: epresentative (Respondent) argued t
Page 53 and 54: litiges pouvant être soumis à la
Page 55 and 56: au lien du litige en cause avec le
Page 57 and 58: Contrairement aux autres institutio
Page 59 and 60: coûts doivent être raisonnables 4
Page 61 and 62: Investigating magistrate no. 31 of
Page 63 and 64: 2. Proper Defendants Article 282 of
Page 65 and 66: interference by state courts) with
Page 67 and 68: against doping in sports. To achiev
Page 69 and 70: Arbitration CAS 2010/A/2091 Dennis
Page 71 and 72: had stated that his claim had been
Page 73 and 74: effectiveness and validity of that
Page 75 and 76: another players’ agent (…) oper
Page 77 and 78: Beitar FC. In the Appellant’s vie
Page 79 and 80: The referred letter, in its pertine
Page 81 and 82: 8. Condemn the Respondent to the pa
Page 83 and 84: It is clear for the Panel that the
Page 85 and 86: damage. There is wilful damage when
Page 87 and 88: in the determination of the compens
Page 89 and 90: Arbitration TAS 2010/A/2220 Corina
Page 91 and 92: En date du 27 août 2010, l’Appel
Page 93 and 94: 2010, le droit de Greffe acquitté
Page 95 and 96: Il relève en effet que leur versio
Page 97 and 98: Arbitration C AS 2010/A/2275 Croati
Page 99 and 100: of golf clubs in Croatia had withdr
Page 101 and 102:
(depending upon the translation) th
Page 103 and 104:
waiting until the eve of the AGM 20
Page 105 and 106:
provisional suspension and also to
Page 107 and 108:
that it did not have any particular
Page 109 and 110:
c) The resolution fi le dated Febru
Page 111 and 112:
2011, Art. 156 no. 11 ff) if the ev
Page 113 and 114:
Article 293 UCI ADR determines the
Page 115 and 116:
The Decision seems to be based on t
Page 117 and 118:
clenbuterol can only have entered t
Page 119 and 120:
- how the Prohibited Substance ente
Page 121 and 122:
entry into his system of the Prohib
Page 123 and 124:
which will be addressed in detail b
Page 125 and 126:
in those countries is rampant. Sinc
Page 127 and 128:
as high as 1 out of 100 slaughtered
Page 129 and 130:
athletes having tested positive to
Page 131 and 132:
illustrate that his blood values ar
Page 133 and 134:
specifi c gravity of 1.020. Without
Page 135 and 136:
values of subjects that did not und
Page 137 and 138:
urine tests performed the evenings
Page 139 and 140:
WADA that the calculations regardin
Page 141 and 142:
One of the reasons for that could b
Page 143 and 144:
ingested by him was contaminated wi
Page 145 and 146:
The Athlete refers the Panel to the
Page 147 and 148:
athlete but withdrawn once the time
Page 149 and 150:
The USOC argues that the IOC Regula
Page 151 and 152:
period of ineligibility (non-partic
Page 153 and 154:
Arbitrage TAS 2011/A/2433 Amadou Di
Page 155 and 156:
précisions sur les offres que le Q
Page 157 and 158:
estrictions, non, entre les comité
Page 159 and 160:
En date du 3 février 2011, la Comm
Page 161 and 162:
II 271; H.M. RIEMER, Berner Komment
Page 163 and 164:
onne foi et de respect de la procé
Page 165 and 166:
son exploitation mais, comme observ
Page 167 and 168:
des droits de la personnalité. L
Page 169 and 170:
ne peut que prendre note de remarqu
Page 171 and 172:
En l’espèce, celui qui cherchait
Page 173 and 174:
évidence le fait que leur “condu
Page 175 and 176:
toute activité liée au football
Page 177 and 178:
Extracts from the legal fi ndings A
Page 179 and 180:
Arbitration CAS 2011/O/2574 Union o
Page 181 and 182:
SFL Appeals Tribunal of 29 July 201
Page 183 and 184:
its position on OLA’s request for
Page 185 and 186:
- production par la fondation du co
Page 187 and 188:
(iii) To confi rm that OLA is not e
Page 189 and 190:
CCP. The substantive validity of th
Page 191 and 192:
2.2 Article R46 (1) of the CAS Code
Page 193 and 194:
constitutive of an abuse of a domin
Page 195 and 196:
Claimant to indicate its prayers fo
Page 197 and 198:
It results from the above that UEFA
Page 199 and 200:
The UEL 2011/2012 is an internation
Page 201 and 202:
The Panel considers that the sancti
Page 203 and 204:
- discriminate OLA pursuant to Arti
Page 205 and 206:
Appellant requested the matter be d
Page 207 and 208:
The Panel is satisfi ed that the Bu
Page 209 and 210:
E. Conclusion In summary, the Panel
Page 211 and 212:
Appellant described as caffeine pil
Page 213 and 214:
apply the various regulations of FI
Page 215 and 216:
in doping matters is to be upheld w
Page 217 and 218:
* * 4A_404/2010 Judgment of 19 Apri
Page 219 and 220:
BGG; Jean-Maurice Frésard, in Comm
Page 221 and 222:
Art. 2.1 of the Statutes of Respond
Page 223 and 224:
validity, namely with regard to its
Page 225 and 226:
that he is a Turkish citizen, who p
Page 227 and 228:
in the provisions of any other serv
Page 229 and 230:
Respondent had their domicile, seat
Page 231 and 232:
evidential submission took place ti
Page 233 and 234:
un contrôle antidopage ou à l’a
Page 235 and 236:
essortissant à la conception suiss
Page 237 and 238:
4A_428/2011 Arrêt du 13 février 2
Page 239 and 240:
interdiction d’exécuter les sanc
Page 241 and 242:
Il leur a cependant échappé que c
Page 243 and 244:
éférence (arrêt 4A_246/2011 du 7
Page 245 and 246:
l’AMA entendait tirer de la Conve
Page 247 and 248:
4A_652/2011 Arrêt du 7 mars 2012 I
Page 249:
Publications récentes relatives au
show all

(CAS) Bulletin - Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / TAS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?