11.11.2012 Views

(CAS) Bulletin - Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / TAS

(CAS) Bulletin - Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / TAS

(CAS) Bulletin - Tribunal Arbitral du Sport / TAS

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

It is clear for the Panel that the Player indeed infringed<br />

said obligations. It has been proven that the Club<br />

asked the Player to sign the new contract in the terms<br />

foreseen in clause 7.1 of the Agreement and that the<br />

Player repeatedly refused to do so. This can be clearly<br />

derived from the content of the correspondence<br />

exchanged between the parties <strong>du</strong>ring the months of<br />

December 2010 to May 2011, and was even admitted<br />

by the Player at the hearing.<br />

With regard to the consequences of such a breach,<br />

the parties specifi cally ruled on them in the same<br />

clause 7.1. of the Agreement in the following terms:<br />

“ If the player refuses to extend this Contract he shall pay to<br />

the Club the fi ne equal to the Player’s salary per 5 th season<br />

stipulated in Appendix 1 of this Contract ”.<br />

In line with it the Panel considers that the Player shall<br />

be ordered to pay to the Club the sum contractually<br />

agreed in clause 7.1 in fi ne. However this agreed sum<br />

shall be re<strong>du</strong>ced in (i) the amounts already retained by<br />

the Club on account of such sum and (ii) the amounts<br />

that the Player should have received for the days of<br />

May 2010 he remained with the Club (17 days).<br />

The sum contractually agreed in clause 7.1 in fi ne of<br />

the Agreement is the Player’s salary for the 5 th season<br />

stipulated in Appendix 1 of the Agreement, which is<br />

to be quantifi ed, as per the Claimant’s request and<br />

the additional agreements dated 20 February 2008<br />

and 1 March 2009, in EUR 2.194.896 in accordance<br />

with the following breakdown:<br />

- Salary of the 5 th season: (177.519 x 12) EUR<br />

2.130.228<br />

- Accommodation payments: (5.389 x 12) EUR<br />

64.668<br />

The Club retained EUR 473.384 on account of the<br />

sum contractually agreed in clause 7.1 (EUR 118.346<br />

x 4 months -January to April 2010-). This has not<br />

been contested by the Club.<br />

The Player’s salary for the 17 days of May 2010<br />

amounts EUR 81.312,14 in accordance with the<br />

following breakdown:<br />

- Salary: EUR 78.258,37 (138.103/30 x 17)<br />

- Accommodation payments: EUR 3.053,77<br />

(5.389/30 x 17)<br />

Therefore the amount payable by the Player to<br />

the Club is EUR 1.640,199,86, increased with the<br />

corresponding interest, which in accordance with<br />

article 102 et seq. of the Swiss Code of Obligations<br />

(the “Swiss CO”) and the request of the Club in this<br />

respect (“condemn the Respondent to pay 5% annual interest<br />

on the amount awarded by the <strong>CAS</strong> from the date of the breach<br />

of contract in accordance with Swiss Law”) is to be fi xed<br />

in 5% per annum from the date of the Agreement’s<br />

termination, i.e. as from 17 May 2010.<br />

3. The termination of the Agreement by the Player.<br />

Just cause or not.<br />

The Panel shall now examine the termination of<br />

the Agreement executed by the Player as well as the<br />

consequences of such termination.<br />

In this respect, the Panel notes that the Player holds<br />

that he had just cause to terminate the Agreement<br />

as the Club did not pay him the full agreed salary,<br />

while the Club argues that it was entitled to pay a<br />

re<strong>du</strong>ced amount of salary to the Player at the time of<br />

the Agreement’s termination and thus, that the Player<br />

terminated such Agreement without just cause.<br />

The Panel deems indisputable (in fact, it is admitted<br />

by the parties) that from January 2010 on, the Player<br />

did not receive the total agreed salary.<br />

The discrepancy between the parties’ lies on the<br />

Club’s legitimacy not to pay a very substantial part<br />

of the Player’s salary on account or in application of<br />

the penalty stipulated in clause 7.1 of the Agreement<br />

given the breach of the Player’s <strong>du</strong>ties under such<br />

clause.<br />

Therefore the Panel shall determine whether or not<br />

such partial payment of the salary constituted just<br />

cause and entitled the Player to unilaterally terminate<br />

the Agreement.<br />

In this regard, the Panel is aware that given the<br />

rejection of the Player to sign the extension of his<br />

contractual relationship with the Club, Shakhtar<br />

decided to act in the way announced in its letter to<br />

the Player dated 3 rd February 2010, which relevant<br />

part reads as follows:<br />

“ Following to the above mentioned the Club has applied the<br />

fi ne stipulated in clause 7.1 of the contract. The Club will<br />

retain the amount of fi ne from your future salary starting from<br />

January 2010. Below is a breakdown of the amount to be paid<br />

by the Club under the labour contract:<br />

138,103 EUR * 18 month (outstanding salary) + 5389 * 18<br />

month (house rent compensation) – 2.130.228 EUR (salary to<br />

fi fth season/fi ne) = EUR 452.628<br />

So your monthly salary will be re<strong>du</strong>ced to the amount of<br />

Jurisprudence majeure / Leading cases<br />

-<br />

80

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!