15.01.2015 Views

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Executive summary<br />

Background to this report<br />

The <strong>Ombudsman</strong> is required to keep under scrutiny the exercise of functions conferred on police officers under the<br />

<strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> (the <strong>Act</strong>) from July <strong>2000</strong> to November 2004, and provide a report on our work and<br />

activities to the Attorney General, Minister for Police and Commissioner for Police as soon as practicable after the<br />

expiration of the review period. 1 We provided an initial report, on the DNA sampling of serious indictable offenders,<br />

in August 2004. This second report deals with DNA sampling and other forensic procedures conducted on suspects<br />

and volunteers.<br />

This report follows two other reviews of the legislation. First, the <strong>NSW</strong> Parliamentary Standing Committee on Law<br />

and Justice inquired into the operation of the <strong>Act</strong>, focusing on the effectiveness of DNA evidence and the implications<br />

of its use in criminal investigations. The Committee reported its findings to Parliament in February 2002. Second, the<br />

Attorney General reviewed the <strong>Act</strong> to determine whether its policy objectives remain valid, and whether the terms of<br />

the <strong>Act</strong> remain appropriate to securing those objectives. The Attorney General’s report was finalised in April 2003.<br />

This review focuses on whether police officers and others involved in forensic procedures are complying with their<br />

legislative obligations, and are exercising their powers fairly and effectively.<br />

Key provisions of the <strong>Act</strong><br />

A forensic procedure is a way to obtain evidence that relates to the investigation and prosecution of a crime.<br />

The <strong>Act</strong> authorises three different categories of forensic procedures – buccal swabs (for DNA sampling); non-intimate<br />

forensic procedures (which includes photographs, swabs, nail scrapings, fingerprints, hair samples and visual<br />

examinations of the body); and intimate forensic procedures (including blood samples, dental impressions, pubic hair<br />

samples, intimate photographs and visual examinations of genitals, buttocks or breasts). Most forensic procedures<br />

are conducted by police officers, although some may be conducted by other experts, such as medical practitioners<br />

or dentists.<br />

<strong>Forensic</strong> procedures can be conducted on suspects, volunteers and certain convicted offenders. A suspect is a<br />

person who police believe on reasonable grounds has committed an offence. Volunteers are generally people who<br />

have some connection to a crime or crime scene, but are not suspects, for example witnesses, residents of a place<br />

where a crime has been committed, and partners of people who have been sexually assaulted by somebody else.<br />

Convicted offenders are people who have been convicted of a “serious indictable offence”; that is, an offence which<br />

carries a maximum penalty of five years imprisonment or more. Victims of crime are specifically excluded from the<br />

operation of the <strong>Act</strong>.<br />

Volunteers can only undergo forensic procedures by consent, but suspects and convicted offenders can undergo<br />

forensic procedures by consent, senior police order or court order. For a forensic procedure to be conducted on a<br />

suspect in the absence of consent, the suspect must be under arrest, there must be reasonable grounds to believe<br />

the procedure might produce evidence tending to confirm or disprove the suspect committed the offence, and<br />

carrying out the procedure must be justified in all the circumstances. Police may use reasonable force to conduct<br />

a forensic procedure, but cannot conduct the procedure in a cruel, inhuman or degrading manner.<br />

The <strong>Act</strong> provides for a DNA database system, which contains indexes of DNA profiles obtained from crime scenes,<br />

suspects, volunteers, convicted offenders, missing persons and unknown deceased persons. When DNA profiles<br />

are put on the database, only certain types of matching are permitted. DNA profiles obtained from suspects and<br />

convicted offenders can be matched against the entire crime scene index, while profiles obtained from volunteers<br />

can only be used for a purpose permitted by the volunteer, and are usually only used in relation to the investigation<br />

of a particular offence.<br />

The <strong>Act</strong> contains a number of safeguards, to protect the rights and interests of people on whom police would like<br />

to conduct a forensic procedure. Police must inform the person of the nature and consequences of the proposed<br />

procedure, give the person reasonable opportunity to communicate with a legal practitioner before asking for<br />

consent, and electronically record the request for consent and, unless the person objects, the procedure itself.<br />

<strong>Forensic</strong> procedures cannot be conducted during questioning, and there are limits on the amount of time a person<br />

can be kept in custody for the purpose of conducting a forensic procedure. There are particular provisions relating<br />

<strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Ombudsman</strong><br />

DNA sampling and other forensic procedures conducted on suspects and volunteers under the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2000</strong><br />

i

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!