Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...
Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...
Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The resolution established a European standard set of markers, to enable the comparison of samples analysed in<br />
different countries. 254<br />
Although the exchange of profiles between European countries is encouraged, there is no European DNA database.<br />
However, the issue is still being debated. In July 2004 at a European Union meeting of interior ministers, the Home<br />
Secretary of the United Kingdom put forward a proposal for the development of a European DNA database. 255<br />
The proposal largely stemmed from media attention given to the murder of an English school girl in France in 1996.<br />
It was not until 2004 that a suspect was identified in the United States by a DNA match and was extradited to France<br />
to stand trial. The investigation has brought about changes to the French DNA database, and has prompted further<br />
discussion of the merits of a European DNA database. 256<br />
In May 2005, seven European countries (Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Austria, France and<br />
Spain) announced they would sign an agreement to allow automatic access to each other’s DNA and fingerprint<br />
databases. It appears that other European countries may join the arrangement some time in the future. 257<br />
3.5.2. A global DNA database<br />
In 1998, the Interpol European Working Party on DNA Profiling expanded, so that all continents would be<br />
represented. 258 The group became known as the Interpol DNA Monitoring Expert Group. In 1999, it recommended<br />
that an Interpol DNA database be created, so DNA profiles could be exchanged by member countries through<br />
Interpol.<br />
In 2001, Interpol indicated that it proposed to establish an international database of DNA profiles, for use by its<br />
member states. Member states would be able to submit DNA profiles for addition to the Interpol DNA database, and<br />
would be able to search the database, using an Interpol Internet browser. The system would compare profiles added<br />
to the database with those already on it, and would notify the member states involved in the event of a match. It would<br />
be the responsibility of the member states to act on this information.<br />
Interpol made it clear that the database would be limited to the investigation of crime connected to more than one<br />
country:<br />
The Interpol database is not intended to be a substitute for countries’ national databases. The only profiles<br />
submitted should be those of known criminals operating internationally or those of unknown stains found at<br />
crime scenes when it is suspected that the offender might be a foreign national. 259<br />
No biological material would be submitted to Interpol, only the DNA profile, which would be submitted electronically. 260<br />
In 2002, the Interpol DNA Unit reported on its global DNA database inquiry. At the time, 179 countries were Interpol<br />
member states. The inquiry concluded that 43 per cent of these countries perform forensic DNA analysis, and 23<br />
per cent have a DNA database. A further 15 per cent were planning to install a national DNA database in the near<br />
future. 261 Interpol also reported that as a result of its inquiry, many countries requested Interpol’s assistance to help<br />
set up a national DNA database. 262<br />
In 2003, a DNA database pilot project was set up at the Interpol General Secretariat. It aimed to provide an additional<br />
resource for member countries “to track down and identify those who commit cross border crimes.” 263 In 2004,<br />
the first hit from the database was announced, after a request from Slovenia was matched to a profile previously<br />
submitted by Croatia.<br />
Endnotes<br />
78 <strong>Crimes</strong> <strong>Act</strong> 1900 s 353A, ins erted by <strong>Crimes</strong> Amendment <strong>Act</strong> 1924 s 13.<br />
79 Fernando v Commissioner of Police (1995) 36 <strong>NSW</strong>LR 567 at 593 (Powell JA).<br />
80 <strong>Crimes</strong> <strong>Act</strong> 1900 s 353A(3A) (repealed).<br />
81 Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) <strong>Act</strong> 1999 s 27.<br />
82 Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) <strong>Act</strong> 1999 s 20.<br />
83 <strong>NSW</strong> Legislative Assembly Hansard, 31 May <strong>2000</strong>, Mr P Whelan MP, p. 6293.<br />
84 <strong>NSW</strong> Legislative Assembly Hansard, 31 May <strong>2000</strong>, Mr P Whelan MP, p. 6293.<br />
85 <strong>NSW</strong> Legislative Assembly Hansard, 31 May <strong>2000</strong>, Mr P Whelan MP, p. 6293.<br />
<strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Ombudsman</strong><br />
DNA sampling and other forensic procedures conducted on suspects and volunteers under the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2000</strong> 33