15.01.2015 Views

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The resolution established a European standard set of markers, to enable the comparison of samples analysed in<br />

different countries. 254<br />

Although the exchange of profiles between European countries is encouraged, there is no European DNA database.<br />

However, the issue is still being debated. In July 2004 at a European Union meeting of interior ministers, the Home<br />

Secretary of the United Kingdom put forward a proposal for the development of a European DNA database. 255<br />

The proposal largely stemmed from media attention given to the murder of an English school girl in France in 1996.<br />

It was not until 2004 that a suspect was identified in the United States by a DNA match and was extradited to France<br />

to stand trial. The investigation has brought about changes to the French DNA database, and has prompted further<br />

discussion of the merits of a European DNA database. 256<br />

In May 2005, seven European countries (Belgium, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Austria, France and<br />

Spain) announced they would sign an agreement to allow automatic access to each other’s DNA and fingerprint<br />

databases. It appears that other European countries may join the arrangement some time in the future. 257<br />

3.5.2. A global DNA database<br />

In 1998, the Interpol European Working Party on DNA Profiling expanded, so that all continents would be<br />

represented. 258 The group became known as the Interpol DNA Monitoring Expert Group. In 1999, it recommended<br />

that an Interpol DNA database be created, so DNA profiles could be exchanged by member countries through<br />

Interpol.<br />

In 2001, Interpol indicated that it proposed to establish an international database of DNA profiles, for use by its<br />

member states. Member states would be able to submit DNA profiles for addition to the Interpol DNA database, and<br />

would be able to search the database, using an Interpol Internet browser. The system would compare profiles added<br />

to the database with those already on it, and would notify the member states involved in the event of a match. It would<br />

be the responsibility of the member states to act on this information.<br />

Interpol made it clear that the database would be limited to the investigation of crime connected to more than one<br />

country:<br />

The Interpol database is not intended to be a substitute for countries’ national databases. The only profiles<br />

submitted should be those of known criminals operating internationally or those of unknown stains found at<br />

crime scenes when it is suspected that the offender might be a foreign national. 259<br />

No biological material would be submitted to Interpol, only the DNA profile, which would be submitted electronically. 260<br />

In 2002, the Interpol DNA Unit reported on its global DNA database inquiry. At the time, 179 countries were Interpol<br />

member states. The inquiry concluded that 43 per cent of these countries perform forensic DNA analysis, and 23<br />

per cent have a DNA database. A further 15 per cent were planning to install a national DNA database in the near<br />

future. 261 Interpol also reported that as a result of its inquiry, many countries requested Interpol’s assistance to help<br />

set up a national DNA database. 262<br />

In 2003, a DNA database pilot project was set up at the Interpol General Secretariat. It aimed to provide an additional<br />

resource for member countries “to track down and identify those who commit cross border crimes.” 263 In 2004,<br />

the first hit from the database was announced, after a request from Slovenia was matched to a profile previously<br />

submitted by Croatia.<br />

Endnotes<br />

78 <strong>Crimes</strong> <strong>Act</strong> 1900 s 353A, ins erted by <strong>Crimes</strong> Amendment <strong>Act</strong> 1924 s 13.<br />

79 Fernando v Commissioner of Police (1995) 36 <strong>NSW</strong>LR 567 at 593 (Powell JA).<br />

80 <strong>Crimes</strong> <strong>Act</strong> 1900 s 353A(3A) (repealed).<br />

81 Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) <strong>Act</strong> 1999 s 27.<br />

82 Road Transport (Safety and Traffic Management) <strong>Act</strong> 1999 s 20.<br />

83 <strong>NSW</strong> Legislative Assembly Hansard, 31 May <strong>2000</strong>, Mr P Whelan MP, p. 6293.<br />

84 <strong>NSW</strong> Legislative Assembly Hansard, 31 May <strong>2000</strong>, Mr P Whelan MP, p. 6293.<br />

85 <strong>NSW</strong> Legislative Assembly Hansard, 31 May <strong>2000</strong>, Mr P Whelan MP, p. 6293.<br />

<strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Ombudsman</strong><br />

DNA sampling and other forensic procedures conducted on suspects and volunteers under the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2000</strong> 33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!