Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...
Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...
Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
normally hair samples) can be taken from adult suspects who do not consent to a buccal swab. Courts may order any<br />
type of forensic procedure. 777<br />
We found that in general, police understood that where a person did not consent to a buccal swab, they could<br />
consider taking a sample without the person’s consent, and in this case a hair sample should be taken.<br />
However, we received a complaint relating to a suspect who had a buccal swab taken by force. This complaint is<br />
discussed in more detail at 15.3.4 as complaint number 6.<br />
8.6.2. Hair samples<br />
Hair samples are generally only taken where a suspect does not consent to a buccal swab, or in rare cases where<br />
the actual hair (rather than the person’s DNA) is required for forensic analysis. During the review period, less than<br />
four per cent of DNA samples were taken by hair sample. 778 All police officers who are trained in forensic procedures<br />
are accredited to take hair samples. Neither the training or SOPs specify where hair must be taken from, but both the<br />
information available on the <strong>NSW</strong> Police intranet and training course use the example of hair taken from a person’s<br />
head. 779<br />
It is <strong>NSW</strong> Police policy to take between 15 and 20 hairs, by the “lever arch” method. This involves grasping the hair<br />
near the skin between the thumb and fingers and turning the wrist whilst pulling the hairs, to ensure they come out<br />
with the hair root attached. Once sufficient hairs have been obtained they are placed in an envelope and sent to DAL<br />
for analysis.<br />
Police normally take hair from a person’s head, but it can be taken from anywhere on the body. However, pubic hair<br />
can only be taken by order of a court. 780<br />
We watched a number of hair samples during our video audit. Generally, although not always, the person providing<br />
the sample was cooperative, and did not flinch or complain about the procedure. Some officers had difficulty pulling<br />
out the hair, and it usually took several attempts to get enough hair. It was especially difficult where the suspect had<br />
short hair and the police officer was wearing rubber gloves. Sometimes the officer was able to take the hair from the<br />
person’s head easily, but then struggled to get the hair off the rubber gloves and into the envelope.<br />
Case Study 50<br />
After receiving legal advice, a suspect declined to undergo a forensic procedure. A senior police officer<br />
order was made for a hair sample to be taken. The suspect had a closely shaved head, and it took police 20<br />
attempts to get enough hair for analysis. The suspect grimaced as if in pain, and said “ow” a number of times.<br />
The police officer was successful on his twelfth attempt, and then told the suspect, “I need to get at least 12<br />
hairs mate.” The suspect asked, “Are you serious Can’t you use scissors or something” The police officer<br />
replied, “No, you need the root.” The officer was successful on the fifteenth and sixteenth attempts. After the<br />
eighteenth attempt, the suspect asked, “How many in that, seven” The police officer replied, “No, about four.”<br />
The police officer stopped taking hair after the twentieth attempt. He was polite throughout, but it was clear he<br />
had considerable difficulty conducting the procedure. The suspect was cooperative and did not complain, but<br />
seemed to be in considerable discomfort. 781<br />
Case Study 51<br />
A suspect was informed that a hair sample would be taken, by order of a senior police officer. The suspect<br />
said, “OK.” He did not flinch when the sample was taken but did scratch his head afterwards. Police asked<br />
whether he had any complaints. He replied, “No. I don’t think it should have been undertaken but the way it<br />
was undertaken was fine.” 782<br />
<strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Ombudsman</strong><br />
DNA sampling and other forensic procedures conducted on suspects and volunteers under the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2000</strong> 147