15.01.2015 Views

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

1096 Justice Wood, “<strong>Forensic</strong> Sciences from the Judicial Perspective”, address to the 16th Symposium on <strong>Forensic</strong> Sciences, May 2002,<br />

available from the Supreme Court website: www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au, accessed 22 November 2005.<br />

1097 ABC, Catalyst, “DNA Doubt,” aired 16 September 2004. Transcript available at www.abc.net.au, accessed 6 December 2005.<br />

1098 Peter Gill & Amanda Kirkham, “Development of a simulation model to assess the impact of contamination in casework using STRs”,<br />

Journal of <strong>Forensic</strong> Science, May 2004 Volume 49 Number 3 available at www.astm.org accessed on 16 August 2005.<br />

1099 E O’Dwyer, “Barnes cleared of Allen murder”, Illawarra Mercury, 29 May 2004.<br />

1100 Peter Gill, “Application of Low Copy Number DNA Profiling”, Croatian Medical Journal 42(3):229-232 (2001).<br />

1101 Information obtained through <strong>Ombudsman</strong> review of COPS records.<br />

1102 Information obtained through <strong>Ombudsman</strong> review of COPS records.<br />

1103 Information obtained through <strong>Ombudsman</strong> review of COPS records.<br />

1104 Information obtained through <strong>Ombudsman</strong> review of COPS records.<br />

1105 Information obtained through <strong>Ombudsman</strong> review of COPS records.<br />

1106 Confidential LAC survey response<br />

1107 Information supplied by DAL on 28 February 2005.<br />

1108 <strong>NSW</strong> Police response to <strong>Ombudsman</strong> draft report, 2 June 2006.<br />

1109 During the review period we received one complaint regarding the packaging of crime scene exhibits and possible tampering. This is<br />

discussed in chapter 15 as complaint number .<br />

1110 Some jurisdictions have developed best practice guides on DNA sampling, which include information on how to minimise<br />

contamination risks. For example, the United Kingdom Association of Chief Police Officers published “Guidelines for the Avoidance of<br />

Contamination in the Recovery, Packaging and Submission of Material for DNA Analysis” in its DNA Good Practice Manual: see<br />

www.forensic.gov.uk/forensic_t/inside/news/docs/DNA_Good.pdf, accessed 21 November 2005. Interpol published a Handbook on<br />

DNA Data Exchange and Practice in 2001, which includes quality assurance information for collecting and managing samples: see<br />

http://www.interpol.int/Public/<strong>Forensic</strong>/dna/HandbookPublic.pdf, accessed 17 February 2006. See also Justice Wood, “<strong>Forensic</strong><br />

Sciences from the Judicial Perspective”, address to the 16th Symposium on <strong>Forensic</strong> Sciences, May 2002, available from the Supreme<br />

Court website: www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au accessed 22 November 2005.<br />

1111 <strong>NSW</strong> Police College advice on Constable Education Program, received 29 November 2005.<br />

1112 <strong>NSW</strong> Police Detective Training Unit advice on Specialist Courses, email dated 13 December 2005.<br />

1113 Control or reference samples are defined in the SOPs as material of similar composition to a suspect sample collected from a scene<br />

or item. The purpose of a control sample is to allow an analyst to separate the original material from “introduced substances” resulting<br />

from the crime incident.<br />

1114 FSG presentation to DAL, attached to agenda for DNA Advisory Committee meeting 6 August 2004.<br />

1115 Minutes of meeting between <strong>NSW</strong> Police <strong>Forensic</strong> Services Group and DAL, 27 April 2004.<br />

1116 Minutes of the DNA Advisory Committee, 13 October 2004.<br />

1117 FSG presentation to DAL, attached to agenda for DNA Advisory Committee meeting 6 August 2004.<br />

1118 DAL comments on <strong>Ombudsman</strong> statement of provisional findings, 17 October 2005.<br />

1119 <strong>NSW</strong> Police response to <strong>Ombudsman</strong> draft report, 2 June 2006.<br />

1120 <strong>NSW</strong> Police response to <strong>Ombudsman</strong> draft report, 2 June 2006.<br />

1121 <strong>NSW</strong> Health response to <strong>Ombudsman</strong> draft report, 7 June 2006.<br />

1122 For an example of quality assurance guidelines, see the FBI’s “Standards for <strong>Forensic</strong> DNA Testing Laboratories”, located at<br />

http://www.fbi.gov/hq/lab/codis/qualassur.htm, accessed 29 July 2005.<br />

1123 J Goodman-Delahunty and B Newell, “One in how many trillion DNA evidence and the juror”, Australasian Science Magazine, August<br />

2004, p. 14 to 17.<br />

1124 Sydney Morning Herald, “Beyond reasonable doubt”, 22 April <strong>2000</strong> http://cjpa.freeswervers.com/smh.htm accessed 20 July 2005.<br />

1125 New Zealand Environmental Science and Research Limited website, http://www.esr.cri.nz<br />

1126 DNAResource.com Report dated 24 June 2005.<br />

1127 National Association of Testing Authorities Australia, Report on Reassessment: ICPMR, 30 July 2004.<br />

1128 Minutes of meeting between <strong>NSW</strong> Police <strong>Forensic</strong> Services Group and DAL, 1 June 2004.<br />

1129 DAL comments on <strong>Ombudsman</strong> statement of provisional findings, 17 October 2005.<br />

<strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Ombudsman</strong><br />

DNA sampling and other forensic procedures conducted on suspects and volunteers under the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2000</strong> 241

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!