15.01.2015 Views

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

considerations. Alternatively, the Australian Law Reform Commission has made recommendations which are against<br />

current police practice and require due consideration. A middle course may be for courts to be permitted in certain<br />

circumstances to order that covert samples be collected by police officers.<br />

Recommendation 53<br />

<strong>NSW</strong> Police keep records of the number of covert DNA samples submitted for analysis, the reason why the<br />

sample was taken covertly, and the results of the analysis, and includes these in its annual report.<br />

Recommendation 54<br />

Parliament consider regulating the collection of covert samples to include under what circumstances covert<br />

samples can be collected, whether a court order should be required, and how profiles obtained from covert<br />

samples should be managed on the New South Wales DNA database.<br />

<strong>NSW</strong> Police is still considering recommendation 53, but supports recommendation 54. 879 The Minister for Police<br />

commented that he could not endorse this recommendation until he had the opportunity to consult further with<br />

operational police. Given the complexity of the legislation, the Minister did not support any further restrictions on<br />

police collecting covert samples, and advised that admissibility of such evidence should be left to the courts. 880<br />

In its submission, the Attorney General’s Department noted the courts’ view that any investigative conduct not<br />

specifically mentioned in the <strong>Act</strong> is unregulated, and commented:<br />

The current state of affairs provides little incentive for investigating police officers to work within the confines of<br />

the <strong>Act</strong>, rather than arranging their investigation so that the <strong>Act</strong> does not apply at all. This issue may need to be<br />

considered in due course. 881<br />

9.3. Obtaining DNA from deceased persons<br />

The <strong>Act</strong> does not specify the circumstances in which police can take a DNA sample from a deceased person.<br />

However, it does specify that forensic material “taken from the body of a deceased person” may be supplied for the<br />

purpose of DNA analysis, for inclusion on one of the indexes of the DNA database. 882 Profiles from deceased persons<br />

can be put on the “volunteers (unlimited purposes)” index where the person’s identity is known, and on the “unknown<br />

deceased persons” index where the person’s identity is not known. 883<br />

Case Study 62<br />

Police were reinvestigating a sexual assault and murder which had been committed almost 20 years before.<br />

Police took covert DNA samples from a number of suspects – in one case by retrieving a glass the suspect<br />

had used, in another by buying a baseball cap from the suspect. Police identified a fifth suspect, who had<br />

recently been killed in a road accident. Police obtained a blood sample which had been taken during the<br />

autopsy, and submitted it for DNA analysis. Relying on DNA evidence, the coroner concluded that the<br />

deceased committed the murder. A relative of the deceased made a complaint about a number of aspects<br />

of the police investigation.<br />

In our oversight role, we indicated that police investigating the complaint should consider why covert samples<br />

were taken from suspects when the <strong>Act</strong> provides the regulatory framework for taking DNA samples from<br />

suspects. The police investigator advised that the strategies used by police in reinvestigating the murder<br />

depended on the operation remaining covert in its early stages, and further, that all of the living suspects<br />

were interstate, so samples could not be taken under the <strong>Act</strong>. The investigator concluded that “police were<br />

entirely within their powers to take such samples and analyse those samples in a criminal investigation through<br />

common law powers to seize exhibits.”<br />

174<br />

<strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Ombudsman</strong><br />

DNA sampling and other forensic procedures conducted on suspects and volunteers under the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2000</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!