15.01.2015 Views

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Recommendation 89<br />

Staff in all laboratories which provide DNA analysis services to <strong>NSW</strong> Police be required to provide a DNA<br />

sample, to be included on DAL’s staff elimination database.<br />

<strong>NSW</strong> Police and <strong>NSW</strong> Health both support this recommendation. 1133<br />

12.4.2. Police elimination databases<br />

The United Kingdom set up a police elimination database in <strong>2000</strong>, which now has DNA profiles from over 82,000<br />

officers on it. Providing a sample was voluntary for existing officers but is a condition of employment for new<br />

officers. 1134 Profiles on the elimination database are not routinely searched against unsolved crime scenes; a<br />

particular officer’s profile is searched against a particular crime scene sample only where it appears that the sample<br />

may have been contaminated. 1135 A separate sampling kit has been developed for taking DNA from police officers. 1136<br />

At this stage, there is no police elimination database in New South Wales. However, we understand there has been<br />

some discussion between DAL and <strong>NSW</strong> Police about the need to establish one. DAL provided the following example<br />

of contamination by a police officer:<br />

Case Study 81<br />

“In a murder case from 2003, the officer in charge of the case and the DPP were extremely concerned about<br />

the unknown profile on the victim’s jumper that did not match the suspect. Was it relevant and how would the<br />

evidence be used in defending the accused The police were gearing up to screen a number of individuals in<br />

the hope of identifying from whom the DNA originated. Then in 2005, a violent armed robbery occurred and<br />

the same DNA profile was found. DAL... informed police of the match and suggested that they should look at<br />

police who were common to both cases. It turned out that the forensic services investigator was involved in<br />

both cases and after the police officer volunteered a sample his DNA was found to match the unknown DNA<br />

profile from the murder victim.” 1137<br />

Of the 180 forensic procedures included in our audit of DAL, at least one was a DNA sample taken from a police<br />

officer because it appeared evidence from the crime scene was contaminated. The officer had cut himself while<br />

examining the crime scene, and there was forensic material on crime scene evidence which did not come from the<br />

suspect. On analysis it was determined that the profile obtained from the officer’s buccal swab matched the profile<br />

obtained from the crime scene evidence. This meant that the forensic material in question had come from the police<br />

officer, and not from some other unknown offender. 1138<br />

DAL has told us that it is not at all unusual for DNA from police officers, scene of crime officers and forensic<br />

services officers to be found on crime scene evidence, although this would generally only come to light after police<br />

and laboratory staff have spent considerable time and resources attempting to identify the contributor. DAL has<br />

commented that:<br />

Many more unidentified profiles sitting on the DNA database and thought to belong to the perpetrators of the<br />

crime may in fact belong to other police service employees... the conclusion must be stated explicitly – if<br />

the police do not want to have a profile on a police elimination DNA database, they should not be involved in<br />

the collection, examination and investigation of crimes scene samples. Their reluctance to provide reference<br />

samples has resulted in the very thing they have wanted to avoid – namely their profiles being placed onto the<br />

crime scene DNA database. This has the potential to jeopardise investigations with detectives wasting time<br />

hunting for the source of these unknown ‘offenders’. Their reluctance will also inevitably result in a case where<br />

the true offender may walk free through the inability of the police to explain adventitious DNA found on an<br />

extremely probative piece of evidence. 1139<br />

<strong>NSW</strong> Police already takes fingerprints from potential police officers, scene of crime officers and special constables<br />

when they apply for employment with <strong>NSW</strong> Police. The prints are used to conduct a criminal history check, and are<br />

retained by <strong>NSW</strong> Police on a database, which can be accessed as required for elimination purposes. Prints taken<br />

238<br />

<strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Ombudsman</strong><br />

DNA sampling and other forensic procedures conducted on suspects and volunteers under the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2000</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!