15.01.2015 Views

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

86 For example, <strong>NSW</strong> Legislative Assembly Hansard, 7 June <strong>2000</strong>, Mr M Richardson MP, p. 6736.<br />

87 For example, <strong>NSW</strong> Legislative Council Hansard, 21 June <strong>2000</strong>, the Hon M J Gallacher MLC, p. 7275.<br />

88 Griffith v R (1977) 137 CLR 293 at 327 (Jacobs J).<br />

89 Orban v Bayliss [2004] <strong>NSW</strong>SC 428 at paragraph 30 (Simpson J).<br />

90 For example, see Australian Law Reform Commission, Essentially Yours: The Protection of Human Genetic Information in Australia (March<br />

2003) at paragraph 39.12; Law Reform Commission of Ireland, “Consultation Paper on the Establishment of a DNA Database” (March<br />

2004) at 46; and the United Kingdom Human Genetics Commission, “Inside Information: Balancing Interests in the use of Personal<br />

Genetic Data” (May 2002).<br />

91 For example, <strong>NSW</strong> Legislative Assembly Hansard, 7 June <strong>2000</strong>, Mr M Richardson MP, p. 6738.<br />

92 <strong>NSW</strong> Legislative Council Hansard, 28 June <strong>2000</strong>, the Hon R S L Jones MLC, p. 7658.<br />

93 <strong>NSW</strong> Legislative Council Hansard, 28 June <strong>2000</strong>, Ms L Rhiannon MLC, p. 7662.<br />

94 See, for example, Commonwealth of Australia, “Report of Independent Review of Part 1D of the <strong>Crimes</strong> <strong>Act</strong> 1914 – <strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>”,<br />

March 2003, chapter 3; the Hon Michael Kirby, “DNA Evidence: Proceed with Care”, based on an address to a seminar at the University<br />

of Technology, Sydney, 16 March <strong>2000</strong>; Andrew Haesler, Public Defender, “DNA – An Overview of Testing and the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong><br />

<strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2000</strong>” (June 2003); Ben Saul, “Genetic Policing: <strong>Forensic</strong> DNA Testing in New South Wales”, 13(1) Current Issues in<br />

Criminal Justice at page 74 (July 2001); Evidence by former Privacy Commissioner Chris Puplick before the Standing Committee on Law<br />

and Justice Inquiry into the Operation of the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2000</strong>, 8 August 2001; Dr Jeremy Gans, “Submission to<br />

the Independent Review of Part 1D (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) of the <strong>Crimes</strong> <strong>Act</strong> 1914 (Cth), available at www.ag.gov.au accessed 3 February<br />

2006 and Australian Law Reform Commission, Essentially Yours: The Protection of Human Genetic Information in Australia (March 2003).<br />

95 GeneWatch UK, “The Police National DNA Database: Human rights and privacy”, Briefing Number 31 June 2005, p. 5. Accessible at<br />

http://www.genewatch.org/Publications/Briefs/Brief31.pdf<br />

96 See M Findlay and J Grix, “Challenging <strong>Forensic</strong> Evidence” 14 Current Issues in Criminal Justice 269 and A Haesler SC, “DNA for<br />

Defence Lawyers” (May 2005) on the website of the Public Defenders Office, http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lawlink/pdo/ll_pdo.nsf/pages/<br />

PDO_index accessed 16 August 2005.<br />

97 R v Daley [2001] <strong>NSW</strong>SC 1211 (14 September 2001) at paragraph 62 (Simpson J).<br />

98 Andrew Haesler, Public Defender, “DNA – An Overview of Testing and the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2000</strong>” (June 2003).<br />

99 <strong>NSW</strong> Law Reform Commission, The Right to Silence, Report 95 (<strong>2000</strong>) at 2.2.<br />

100 Petty v The Queen (1991) 173 CLR 95 at 128 to 129 (Gaudron J). See also John Nicholson, “The ‘Right’ to Silence – Only Half a Right”<br />

(<strong>2000</strong>), available from the website of the Public Defenders Office, http://www.lawlink.nsw.gov.au/lawlink/pdo/ll_pdo.nsf/pages/PDO_index<br />

accessed at 17 September 2004.<br />

101 There are other examples of the general right to silence being modified by statute: see <strong>NSW</strong> Law Reform Commission,<br />

The Right to Silence, Report 95 (<strong>2000</strong>) at 2.24.<br />

102 For example, see Dr Jeremy Gans, “Submission to the Independent Review of Part 1D (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) of the <strong>Crimes</strong> <strong>Act</strong> 1914<br />

(Cth), available at www.ag.gov.au accessed 3 February 2006. Although this submission discusses the Commonwealth legislation, it is<br />

largely the same as the New South Wales <strong>Act</strong>.<br />

103 The <strong>Act</strong> required the Attorney General to review its policy objectives: see <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2000</strong> s 122.<br />

104 Model Criminal Code Officers Committee of the Standing Committee of Attorneys-General (MCCOC), Model <strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong> Bill<br />

and the Proposed National DNA Database, May 1999, preface at 11.<br />

105 The National Model Criminal Code Officers Committee, which consists of an officer from each Australian jurisdiction with expertise in<br />

criminal law and criminal justice matters. The National Model Criminal Code Officers Committee (or MCCOC) is a sub-committee of the<br />

Standing Committee of Attorneys-General.<br />

106 Model Criminal Code Officers Committee of the Standing Committee of Attorneys-General, Model <strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong> Bill – DNA<br />

Database Provisions – Explanatory Notes, February <strong>2000</strong>.<br />

107 Standing Committee on Law and Justice, Report No. 18: Review of the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2000</strong>, February 2002;<br />

Australian Law Reform Commission and the National Health and Medical Research Council (ALRC/NHMRC), Discussion Paper 66:<br />

Protection of Human Genetic Information, August 2002.<br />

108 “WA, Qld pool DNA profiles”, Sydney Morning Herald, 22 June 2005.<br />

109 <strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Ombudsman</strong>, The <strong>Forensic</strong> DNA sampling of Serious Indictable Offenders under Part 7 of the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong><br />

<strong>2000</strong>, August 2004.<br />

110 Although in South Australia the terms “intimate”, “intrusive” and “non-intrusive” are used: Criminal Law (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> 1998<br />

(SA) s 3.<br />

34<br />

<strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Ombudsman</strong><br />

DNA sampling and other forensic procedures conducted on suspects and volunteers under the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2000</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!