15.01.2015 Views

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Section 57 of the <strong>Act</strong> provides that police must electronically record the carrying out of the forensic procedure, unless<br />

it is impractical, or the suspect objects to the recording. The suspect must be informed of the reasons for recording<br />

the procedure, including the protection this provides for the suspect. The suspect must also be informed that he or<br />

she may object to the procedure being recorded.<br />

The SOPs include instructions on how to record forensic procedures, and include prompts to make sure officers<br />

comply with the legislative requirements.<br />

8.5.1. How procedures are recorded<br />

We watched 146 videos of forensic procedures during our audit. The standard of recording varied. On some videos<br />

the sound or picture quality made it difficult to determine what was happening. Some showed the whole testing area<br />

and each of the people present, while others showed only the person being tested or the police officer carrying out<br />

the procedure. Not all videos showed the opening or sealing of the tamper-evident bag.<br />

For example, one video showed only a very limited area of the room in which the procedure was conducted. There<br />

was a partial view of the suspect, and only the shoulder of the testing officer was visible. The DNA sample kit or table<br />

were not shown in the video. It appeared that the camera was on a tripod and it was only the testing officer and the<br />

person undergoing the procedure present, but this was not clear. There may have been other people in the room. 755<br />

After reviewing the videos of forensic procedures, we consider the following to be best practice:<br />

• where an officer takes measures to minimise contamination, for example by cleaning the table, that this be<br />

done on video<br />

• the testing officer and person being tested are clearly visible at all times<br />

• the testing officer states the date and time at the start and end of the procedure<br />

• the testing officer introduces himself or herself<br />

• the testing officer identifies by name and role any other persons present, including other police officers<br />

• the testing officer provides an overview of the forensic procedure and process<br />

• the testing officer cautions the person being tested<br />

• the testing officer reads out all relevant information to the suspect or volunteer<br />

• the testing officer obtains both the written and verbal consent of the suspect or volunteer<br />

• the testing officer asks the suspect or volunteer whether they consent to the electronic recording of the<br />

conducting of the forensic procedure after consent has been obtained and prior to commencing the procedure<br />

• where the forensic procedure is the taking of a DNA sample, the opening of the DNA sample kit, the sampling<br />

process and the sealing of the tamper-evident bag are clearly visible and the contents of the DNA sample kit<br />

are visible at all times, and<br />

• the testing officer at the completion of the forensic procedure asks the suspect or volunteer if they have any<br />

complaints about the way the procedure was conducted.<br />

There were few videos where the testing officer identified the other people present or explained their roles. This made<br />

it difficult to assess whether certain legislative obligations were being met, for example whether an interview friend<br />

was present where one was required, or whether the procedure was carried out in reasonable privacy, with only the<br />

necessary people present (as required by section 44 of the <strong>Act</strong>).<br />

8.5.2. Recording the provision of information<br />

We found that contrary to their legislative requirements, police are not always recording the provision of information<br />

to a suspect. In a number of videos we watched, the provision of information was not recorded, although the fact that<br />

the procedure itself was recorded suggested that it was actually practicable to record the provision of information. 756<br />

In some cases, the testing officer referred to having provided the information before starting to record the process. 757<br />

8.5.3. Recording the consent process<br />

We also found that police are not always recording the consent process, which includes the request for consent,<br />

and completion of the consent form. Section 15 of the <strong>Act</strong> requires police to record any response to the information<br />

142<br />

<strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Ombudsman</strong><br />

DNA sampling and other forensic procedures conducted on suspects and volunteers under the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2000</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!