Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...
Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...
Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>NSW</strong> Police had based its volunteer information sheet on clause 7A of the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) Regulation<br />
<strong>2000</strong>, which provides that volunteers must be informed: 939<br />
(a) that the DNA database system includes two indexes relevant to volunteers, a volunteers (limited purposes)<br />
index and a volunteers (unlimited purposes) index,<br />
(b) that the volunteer, or parent or guardian of the volunteer, may give consent subject to the condition that<br />
information obtained from the analysis of forensic material taken in accordance with the consent will only be<br />
placed on a specified index of that system, or will not be placed on either index.<br />
In this way, the legislation essentially sets up three options for volunteer profiles – they can:<br />
1) be placed on the volunteers (limited purposes) index<br />
2) be placed on the volunteers (unlimited purposes) index, or<br />
3) not be placed on any index.<br />
However, DAL advised that it actually puts all DNA profiles obtained from volunteers on the DNA database. It<br />
considers that “samples taken for use within a case are a form of limited purposes volunteer,” and advised that “we<br />
do not see a distinction between ‘only matched within the case itself and placed on the limited purposes index’ – the<br />
effect is the same.” 940 DAL essentially treats the first and third options as the same thing. Further, DAL very rarely uses<br />
the volunteers (unlimited purposes) index. It finds that police officers who have indicated that a volunteer’s profile<br />
is to be used for unlimited purposes often do not have a good understanding of what this means. Before putting a<br />
volunteer profile on the unlimited purposes index, DAL always contacts the officer who took the sample, to confirm<br />
whether the volunteer did actually specify that his or her DNA sample could be used for unlimited purposes. Police<br />
usually advise that they cannot be sure of this and that the person’s profile should only be matched within the case<br />
for which it was provided. Accordingly, DAL has only put volunteer profiles on the unlimited purposes index once or<br />
twice. 941<br />
Through our scrutiny of the <strong>Act</strong>, we have found that some police officers have a very poor understanding of the<br />
distinction between suspects and volunteers. We have also identified serious problems with the provision of<br />
information about forensic procedures to both suspects and volunteers. We are not convinced that volunteers<br />
consenting to forensic procedures have a good understanding of the implications of the procedure, or that they fully<br />
understand what their DNA sample will be used for.<br />
By treating all volunteers as having provided their DNA for the limited purpose of examination within a particular case,<br />
DAL is essentially applying a safeguard in case the police officer who conducted the forensic procedure has not<br />
complied with the legislation. Given the preliminary findings of our review, we support DAL’s approach in relation to<br />
using volunteer samples for limited rather than unlimited purposes.<br />
However, we are concerned that volunteers are providing DNA samples on the basis that they will not be put on the<br />
database, when in fact they will be.<br />
We raised these concerns with both agencies in October 2005. <strong>NSW</strong> Police agreed to remove the references to ‘within<br />
case matching’ from the volunteer information sheet, to ensure that volunteers know their DNA profile will be put on<br />
the DNA database. DAL also agreed that profiles taken for ‘within case matching’ could be deleted from the database<br />
provided the relevant court proceedings have been finalised. <strong>NSW</strong> Police has since advised us formally that it will<br />
remove ‘within case matching’ from its standard operating procedures, and that all volunteers will, in future, be made<br />
aware that their profiles will be put on the DNA database. 942 We note as well as removing references to ‘within case<br />
matching’ from the volunteer information sheet, <strong>NSW</strong> Police should remove the option that a volunteer’s profile not be<br />
placed on any index from the volunteer consent form.<br />
Recommendation 63<br />
DAL continues to use volunteer samples only within the case for which the sample was provided, unless it has<br />
confirmed with the relevant police officer that the volunteer did actually intend that his or her profile be placed<br />
on the “unlimited purposes” index.<br />
<strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Ombudsman</strong><br />
DNA sampling and other forensic procedures conducted on suspects and volunteers under the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2000</strong> 191