Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...
Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...
Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
7.3. Suspects: proceeding by order of a senior police officer<br />
7.3.1. Criteria for making an order<br />
A senior police officer, being a police officer of, or above, the rank of sergeant 548 may order the carrying out of a<br />
non-intimate forensic procedure on a suspect under sections 18 and 19 of the <strong>Act</strong>. The orders can be made once the<br />
senior police officer is satisfied that the following conditions in section 20 of the <strong>Act</strong> have been met:<br />
• the suspect has not consented to the procedure<br />
• the suspect is under arrest<br />
• the suspect is not a child or incapable person<br />
• there are reasonable grounds to believe that the suspect committed an offence, or another offence arising out<br />
of the same circumstances, or another offence in respect of which evidence likely to be obtained as a result of<br />
carrying out the procedure is likely to have probative value<br />
• there are reasonable grounds to believe the forensic procedure might produce evidence tending to confirm of<br />
disprove that the suspect committed such an offence, and<br />
• the carrying out of the procedure without consent is justified in all the circumstances. 549<br />
It is important to note, as discussed above, that the criteria for ordering a procedure and for requesting consent to a<br />
procedure are different – first, because there must be reasonable grounds to believe (as opposed to suspect) that the<br />
suspect committed the offence; and second, police must be satisfied that conducting the procedure in the absence<br />
of consent is justified in all the circumstances (as opposed to the request for consent being justified).<br />
Under section 21 of the <strong>Act</strong>, these orders can be made by the senior police officer in person, or if this is not<br />
practicable by telephone, radio, telex, facsimile or other means of transmission. The suspect, or any legal<br />
representative or interview friend of the suspect are to be provided the opportunity to make a submission to the senior<br />
police officer making the order. These submissions can be made either orally or in writing depending on the format<br />
the senior police officer order will take. If a senior police officer does make an order for a hair sample to be taken from<br />
a suspect, the officer must, as soon as practicable after the order is made, record the date and time the order was<br />
made together with his or her reasons for making the order and provide a copy of the order to the suspect. 550<br />
7.3.2. How often are forensic procedures conducted by senior police officer order<br />
<strong>NSW</strong> Police has developed a form for senior police officers to fill in when ordering forensic procedures. The form sets<br />
out the relevant test but does not allow any provision for the senior police officer to record the reasons for making<br />
the order.<br />
We sought to review how often forensic procedures are conducted by order of a senior police officer, as opposed<br />
to by consent or by order of a court. However, we found very limited information about procedures conducted by<br />
order of a senior police officer. The local area commands we audited usually kept such orders on the individual briefs<br />
of evidence, and did not keep any central record. We were able to identify procedures which had been conducted<br />
by order of senior police officer only because one of the officers present during our audits remembered the details,<br />
or because it was apparent from the video that a senior police officer order had been made. In some cases it was<br />
unclear whether a procedure was conducted by consent or by order, because police had completed a consent form,<br />
but recorded on it that the suspect did not in fact consent. Often there was no way of checking whether a senior<br />
police officer order had been made.<br />
We also asked each local area command in our survey, how many of its forensic procedures had been authorised by<br />
order of a senior police officer. 21 commands advised they had not conducted any forensic procedures by order of a<br />
senior police officer, and 32 commands advised they had. 27 commands were unable to provide this information, as<br />
they did not keep any central record of procedures conducted by order:<br />
There are no records held which indicate on what basis the forensic procedure was taken. 551<br />
The data presented is presented as the best estimate in many cases, and may not reflect the exact position. 552<br />
The answers have been supplied based on recollection only, and as no recollection of such events occurring I<br />
can only assume that the answer is nil. 553<br />
100<br />
<strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Ombudsman</strong><br />
DNA sampling and other forensic procedures conducted on suspects and volunteers under the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2000</strong>