15.01.2015 Views

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Recommendation 94<br />

When DAL receives a destruction request, it deletes the DNA profile from the database, as well as destroying<br />

the forensic material and identifying information.<br />

<strong>NSW</strong> Health advised that it is possible to delete the DNA profile when it receives a destruction request from <strong>NSW</strong><br />

Police. It is currently pursuing the matter with <strong>NSW</strong> Police, as the recommendation requires changes to be made to<br />

the memorandum of understanding in place between DAL and <strong>NSW</strong> Police. 1251<br />

14.2.4. Keeping records of profiles which have been destroyed<br />

When the <strong>Act</strong> first came into force, DAL was destroying all records relating to samples which had to be destroyed.<br />

We were unable to audit DAL properly, as it had no way of identifying how many or which DNA samples had been<br />

destroyed. DAL reviewed this practice during our monitoring of the DNA sampling of serious indictable offenders, and<br />

since September 2001 has kept a record of the barcode and destruction date of the samples it has destroyed. We<br />

understand DAL discussed this issue with the DNA Advisory Committee before deciding that these records should be<br />

retained. 1252<br />

It is arguable that in the interests of privacy, every record relating to a person’s DNA sample should be destroyed<br />

when the sample itself and identifying information has to be destroyed. However, there is a strong public interest in<br />

ensuring DAL is accountable, and can verify which DNA samples it has received and which it has destroyed. In our<br />

view, this outweighs the public interest in destroying every record that a person has ever provided a DNA sample,<br />

and ensures DAL complies with it obligations under the State Records <strong>Act</strong> 1998 to keep full and accurate records of<br />

its activities. 1253 Further, even where DAL destroys a sample, <strong>NSW</strong> Police retains records of the forensic procedure,<br />

including the COPS record, consent form, exhibit book entry and video.<br />

14.2.5. How many DNA samples have been destroyed<br />

14.2.5.1. Volunteers<br />

During the review period, <strong>NSW</strong> Police requested that DAL destroy only five DNA samples taken from volunteers. 1254<br />

This means that less than 1 per cent of DNA samples provided by volunteers during the review period have been<br />

destroyed. 1255 The vast majority of volunteer profiles remain on the database, with their identifying information,<br />

although they are not matched against any of the indexes.<br />

Our audit of DAL included seven DNA samples which DAL recorded as having been taken from volunteers. 1256<br />

None of these had been destroyed. This would be expected, given that <strong>NSW</strong> Police only instructs DAL to destroy<br />

profiles on written request from the person who provided the sample, which happens very rarely.<br />

14.2.5.2. Suspects<br />

During the review period, <strong>NSW</strong> Police identified 1,060 samples which had to be destroyed, which is approximately 12<br />

per cent of the DNA samples provided by suspects during the review period. 1257 The proportion of samples which will<br />

ultimately be destroyed will be higher than this, given that in many cases court proceedings were ongoing at the end<br />

of the review period.<br />

14.2.6. Results of <strong>Ombudsman</strong> audit<br />

DAL advised that of the 180 forensic procedures we included in our audit, 67 DNA profiles were still on the database<br />

as suspects. 1258 We reviewed these and found that for 47 procedures, more than a year had elapsed since the<br />

procedure had been conducted. This included 12 procedures where over two years had elapsed, and two procedures<br />

where over three years had elapsed. The longest time any of the suspect samples had been kept was 3 years, and 9<br />

months. 1259<br />

We then sought advice from <strong>NSW</strong> Police as to why each of these 47 procedures had been retained for over a year.<br />

The <strong>Act</strong> only permits suspect samples to be retained beyond 12 months where proceedings have commenced<br />

against the person, a warrant has been issued for the person’s apprehension, or police or the DPP have obtained an<br />

extension from a magistrate. <strong>NSW</strong> Police advised that: 1260<br />

264<br />

<strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Ombudsman</strong><br />

DNA sampling and other forensic procedures conducted on suspects and volunteers under the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2000</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!