Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...
Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...
Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Recommendation 94<br />
When DAL receives a destruction request, it deletes the DNA profile from the database, as well as destroying<br />
the forensic material and identifying information.<br />
<strong>NSW</strong> Health advised that it is possible to delete the DNA profile when it receives a destruction request from <strong>NSW</strong><br />
Police. It is currently pursuing the matter with <strong>NSW</strong> Police, as the recommendation requires changes to be made to<br />
the memorandum of understanding in place between DAL and <strong>NSW</strong> Police. 1251<br />
14.2.4. Keeping records of profiles which have been destroyed<br />
When the <strong>Act</strong> first came into force, DAL was destroying all records relating to samples which had to be destroyed.<br />
We were unable to audit DAL properly, as it had no way of identifying how many or which DNA samples had been<br />
destroyed. DAL reviewed this practice during our monitoring of the DNA sampling of serious indictable offenders, and<br />
since September 2001 has kept a record of the barcode and destruction date of the samples it has destroyed. We<br />
understand DAL discussed this issue with the DNA Advisory Committee before deciding that these records should be<br />
retained. 1252<br />
It is arguable that in the interests of privacy, every record relating to a person’s DNA sample should be destroyed<br />
when the sample itself and identifying information has to be destroyed. However, there is a strong public interest in<br />
ensuring DAL is accountable, and can verify which DNA samples it has received and which it has destroyed. In our<br />
view, this outweighs the public interest in destroying every record that a person has ever provided a DNA sample,<br />
and ensures DAL complies with it obligations under the State Records <strong>Act</strong> 1998 to keep full and accurate records of<br />
its activities. 1253 Further, even where DAL destroys a sample, <strong>NSW</strong> Police retains records of the forensic procedure,<br />
including the COPS record, consent form, exhibit book entry and video.<br />
14.2.5. How many DNA samples have been destroyed<br />
14.2.5.1. Volunteers<br />
During the review period, <strong>NSW</strong> Police requested that DAL destroy only five DNA samples taken from volunteers. 1254<br />
This means that less than 1 per cent of DNA samples provided by volunteers during the review period have been<br />
destroyed. 1255 The vast majority of volunteer profiles remain on the database, with their identifying information,<br />
although they are not matched against any of the indexes.<br />
Our audit of DAL included seven DNA samples which DAL recorded as having been taken from volunteers. 1256<br />
None of these had been destroyed. This would be expected, given that <strong>NSW</strong> Police only instructs DAL to destroy<br />
profiles on written request from the person who provided the sample, which happens very rarely.<br />
14.2.5.2. Suspects<br />
During the review period, <strong>NSW</strong> Police identified 1,060 samples which had to be destroyed, which is approximately 12<br />
per cent of the DNA samples provided by suspects during the review period. 1257 The proportion of samples which will<br />
ultimately be destroyed will be higher than this, given that in many cases court proceedings were ongoing at the end<br />
of the review period.<br />
14.2.6. Results of <strong>Ombudsman</strong> audit<br />
DAL advised that of the 180 forensic procedures we included in our audit, 67 DNA profiles were still on the database<br />
as suspects. 1258 We reviewed these and found that for 47 procedures, more than a year had elapsed since the<br />
procedure had been conducted. This included 12 procedures where over two years had elapsed, and two procedures<br />
where over three years had elapsed. The longest time any of the suspect samples had been kept was 3 years, and 9<br />
months. 1259<br />
We then sought advice from <strong>NSW</strong> Police as to why each of these 47 procedures had been retained for over a year.<br />
The <strong>Act</strong> only permits suspect samples to be retained beyond 12 months where proceedings have commenced<br />
against the person, a warrant has been issued for the person’s apprehension, or police or the DPP have obtained an<br />
extension from a magistrate. <strong>NSW</strong> Police advised that: 1260<br />
264<br />
<strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Ombudsman</strong><br />
DNA sampling and other forensic procedures conducted on suspects and volunteers under the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2000</strong>