15.01.2015 Views

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

14.3. Retaining genetic material from people whose profile is on<br />

the database<br />

A separate issue is whether DAL should retain DNA samples from people whose profiles are kept on the database.<br />

When a profile is derived, the forensic material is retained, unless FPIT instructs DAL to destroy it. For most people<br />

who provide a DNA sample, this means the person’s actual DNA will be retained by DAL indefinitely.<br />

A DNA sample contains far more information than a DNA profile. It contains genetic information, and in future may<br />

be further analysed to ascertain information about a person’s appearance, ethnicity and predisposition to inherited<br />

illness. By contrast, a DNA profile is of limited use, and can really only be used to identify a person’s gender or<br />

relatedness to other people whose DNA profiles have been obtained. For these reasons, our view is that DNA<br />

samples should not be retained indefinitely, particularly if the person provided the sample against his or her will,<br />

unless there is good reason for doing so.<br />

We asked DAL why person samples are retained, once the person’s DNA profile has been put on the database. DAL<br />

advised this is for two reasons. First, every time a cold link is made, DAL goes back to the original person sample<br />

to check that the correct profile has been derived. DAL commented that “although a discrepancy has never been<br />

obtained if this did occur there would be a lack of faith in the system if the wrong person was arrested because the<br />

sample has been confused with another.” 1285<br />

Second, DAL currently uses the Profiler Plus system of DNA profiling, and examines 9 loci on the DNA. The more loci<br />

examined, the greater the likelihood that samples with the same profile came from the same person. If in the future<br />

DAL moved a more discriminating system, more detailed DNA profiles could be derived for all the people currently<br />

on the DNA database, without having to take new samples from them. 1286 Further, the legislation currently limits the<br />

purposes for which DNA samples can be used.<br />

<strong>NSW</strong> Police advanced the same arguments – that future advances in DNA technology, and cheaper analysis, may<br />

allow the DNA samples stored at DAL to be re-analysed, so more discriminatory profiles can be derived. 1287<br />

We agree that in these circumstances, retaining the actual DNA samples from suspects (other than those that are<br />

regulated to be destroyed) and serious indictable offenders is warranted. However, we are not aware of any good<br />

reason for retaining DNA samples taken from volunteers, once the person’s profile has been put on the database and<br />

the case for which it was provided has been finalised. Our view remains that these samples should be destroyed.<br />

Recommendation 102<br />

The responsible person consider whether sample material obtained from volunteers should be retained once a<br />

profile has been loaded onto the database and the relevant proceedings have been finalised.<br />

<strong>NSW</strong> Police supports this recommendation. 1288<br />

14.4. Destroying forensic material other than DNA samples<br />

The provisions requiring material obtained through a forensic procedure to be destroyed also apply to prints,<br />

photographs, casts or impressions and other samples taken from a person’s body. 1289 However, we found there are<br />

no clear procedures in place to monitor the destruction of forensic material other than DNA samples.<br />

We reiterate that full and accurate records of all forensic procedures need to be maintained on COPS, and that <strong>NSW</strong><br />

Police needs to monitor the outcome of every matter where material is obtained through a forensic procedure, to<br />

ensure it is destroyed where required.<br />

14.4.1. Destruction of forensic procedure prints<br />

Section 87A of the <strong>Act</strong> provides that where finger or hand prints have been voluntarily provided for elimination<br />

purposes, they must be destroyed or returned to the volunteer as soon as practicable after they have been used to<br />

exclude the person from the investigation. 1290 The Fingerprint Technology and Support Section of <strong>NSW</strong> Police advised<br />

that it does not destroy prints, it returns them to the investigating officer by registered mail. 1291 It appears therefore that<br />

270<br />

<strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Ombudsman</strong><br />

DNA sampling and other forensic procedures conducted on suspects and volunteers under the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2000</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!