Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...
Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...
Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Case Study 12<br />
A woman was sexually assaulted on a train station in the early hours of the morning. The assault was captured<br />
on closed circuit television. Police identified several possible suspects. According to police records, one<br />
“denied any involvement and was subsequently offered the opportunity to undergo a forensic procedure. A<br />
buccal swab procedure was volunteered to.” Another attended the police station and “consented to supplying<br />
police a mouth buccal swab to rule out himself as a suspect in the commission of this offence.” A third person<br />
of interest was questioned about the incident but did not have a DNA sample taken as police knew his profile<br />
was already on the DNA database. 457<br />
Case Study 13<br />
A 36 year old man was at home with his girlfriend and three young children when he heard a knock at the door.<br />
He opened the door and saw two unknown men, asking for pot. When the man replied he did not have any,<br />
they asked for money, then pushed past him and went into the house. One pulled out a claw hammer and<br />
tried to strike the man. After a short struggle the two men ran from the house, taking two wallets with them. A<br />
short time later police arrested two men whose descriptions matched those of the offenders. The men agreed<br />
to have fingerprints and photographs taken. Both denied being involved in the incident, and gave similar<br />
accounts as to their movements. Investigating police formed the view that they were not the offenders after<br />
all, and released them without charge. Police records stated that “both volunteers agreed to participate in a<br />
forensic procedure photograph and fingerprinting.” 458<br />
Case Study 14<br />
A woman alleged she had been sexually assaulted and identified a particular man as the perpetrator. There<br />
was some evidence that the man was in another town at the time of the incident. Police took a DNA sample<br />
from the man, as a volunteer, to eliminate him from the investigation. 459<br />
In these case studies, it appears the person was treated as a volunteer because there was insufficient evidence<br />
to suspect on reasonable grounds that the person committed the offence. This is consistent with the <strong>NSW</strong> Police<br />
position that ‘volunteer’ includes “persons who have not been excluded as POIs but are not yet suspects.” 460<br />
In some circumstances, police will not ask people of interest to undergo forensic procedures as volunteers because<br />
they do not want to alert them to the fact they are under investigation. For example, in R v White (2005), police<br />
investigating a murder case identified about twenty people of interest. Police obtained covert DNA samples from five<br />
of them, who were then eliminated from the investigation. DNA analysis implicated a sixth person, who subsequently<br />
pleaded guilty to the offence. The police officer in charge of the investigation gave evidence that he did not attempt<br />
to take DNA samples under the <strong>Act</strong> because in his view, the people of interest, including the person subsequently<br />
identified as the offender, were not at that time ‘suspects’ for the purposes of the <strong>Act</strong>. 461<br />
During proceedings in White, the judge commented that he thought suspects and people of interest were “one and<br />
the same.” 462 When asked how a person of interest differs from a suspect, the police officer gave evidence that “a<br />
suspect is a subset of a group of people we call persons of interest and a person of interest is a very broad term and<br />
describes a lot of people.” 463<br />
Should people of interest be considered suspects for the purposes of the <strong>Act</strong> The problem with interpreting ‘suspect’<br />
too broadly is that police could compel people who fall short of being suspected on reasonable grounds of having<br />
committed an offence to undergo forensic procedures. Further, DNA samples taken from suspects can be used much<br />
more broadly than samples taken from volunteers – they can be used for searching against the entire crime scene<br />
index on the DNA database.<br />
<strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Ombudsman</strong><br />
DNA sampling and other forensic procedures conducted on suspects and volunteers under the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2000</strong> 87