15.01.2015 Views

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Case Study 12<br />

A woman was sexually assaulted on a train station in the early hours of the morning. The assault was captured<br />

on closed circuit television. Police identified several possible suspects. According to police records, one<br />

“denied any involvement and was subsequently offered the opportunity to undergo a forensic procedure. A<br />

buccal swab procedure was volunteered to.” Another attended the police station and “consented to supplying<br />

police a mouth buccal swab to rule out himself as a suspect in the commission of this offence.” A third person<br />

of interest was questioned about the incident but did not have a DNA sample taken as police knew his profile<br />

was already on the DNA database. 457<br />

Case Study 13<br />

A 36 year old man was at home with his girlfriend and three young children when he heard a knock at the door.<br />

He opened the door and saw two unknown men, asking for pot. When the man replied he did not have any,<br />

they asked for money, then pushed past him and went into the house. One pulled out a claw hammer and<br />

tried to strike the man. After a short struggle the two men ran from the house, taking two wallets with them. A<br />

short time later police arrested two men whose descriptions matched those of the offenders. The men agreed<br />

to have fingerprints and photographs taken. Both denied being involved in the incident, and gave similar<br />

accounts as to their movements. Investigating police formed the view that they were not the offenders after<br />

all, and released them without charge. Police records stated that “both volunteers agreed to participate in a<br />

forensic procedure photograph and fingerprinting.” 458<br />

Case Study 14<br />

A woman alleged she had been sexually assaulted and identified a particular man as the perpetrator. There<br />

was some evidence that the man was in another town at the time of the incident. Police took a DNA sample<br />

from the man, as a volunteer, to eliminate him from the investigation. 459<br />

In these case studies, it appears the person was treated as a volunteer because there was insufficient evidence<br />

to suspect on reasonable grounds that the person committed the offence. This is consistent with the <strong>NSW</strong> Police<br />

position that ‘volunteer’ includes “persons who have not been excluded as POIs but are not yet suspects.” 460<br />

In some circumstances, police will not ask people of interest to undergo forensic procedures as volunteers because<br />

they do not want to alert them to the fact they are under investigation. For example, in R v White (2005), police<br />

investigating a murder case identified about twenty people of interest. Police obtained covert DNA samples from five<br />

of them, who were then eliminated from the investigation. DNA analysis implicated a sixth person, who subsequently<br />

pleaded guilty to the offence. The police officer in charge of the investigation gave evidence that he did not attempt<br />

to take DNA samples under the <strong>Act</strong> because in his view, the people of interest, including the person subsequently<br />

identified as the offender, were not at that time ‘suspects’ for the purposes of the <strong>Act</strong>. 461<br />

During proceedings in White, the judge commented that he thought suspects and people of interest were “one and<br />

the same.” 462 When asked how a person of interest differs from a suspect, the police officer gave evidence that “a<br />

suspect is a subset of a group of people we call persons of interest and a person of interest is a very broad term and<br />

describes a lot of people.” 463<br />

Should people of interest be considered suspects for the purposes of the <strong>Act</strong> The problem with interpreting ‘suspect’<br />

too broadly is that police could compel people who fall short of being suspected on reasonable grounds of having<br />

committed an offence to undergo forensic procedures. Further, DNA samples taken from suspects can be used much<br />

more broadly than samples taken from volunteers – they can be used for searching against the entire crime scene<br />

index on the DNA database.<br />

<strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Ombudsman</strong><br />

DNA sampling and other forensic procedures conducted on suspects and volunteers under the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2000</strong> 87

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!