Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...
Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...
Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Chapter 14. Destruction of forensic<br />
material<br />
Part 10 of the <strong>Act</strong> sets out the circumstances in which material obtained through forensic procedures must be<br />
destroyed. The destruction requirements apply to “forensic material,” which includes DNA samples, fingerprints,<br />
photographs, casts or impressions and other types of samples taken from a person’s body. 1226 This chapter outlines<br />
the destruction requirements for material taken from suspects and volunteers, and discusses the adequacy of the<br />
mechanisms currently in place to ensure the destruction requirements are met.<br />
14.1. Responsibility for destruction of forensic material<br />
Both <strong>NSW</strong> Police and DAL play a part in destroying DNA samples – <strong>NSW</strong> Police identifies which samples need to<br />
be destroyed, and DAL carries out the actual destruction. Under the Deed of Agreement, FPIT agreed to provide<br />
DAL with destruction requests at least two days prior to the stipulated destruction date. DAL agreed to destroy DNA<br />
samples and identifying information only with the express permission of FPIT, and agreed to provide FPIT with a<br />
destruction certificate within two days of destroying a sample.<br />
<strong>NSW</strong> Police and DAL have both pointed out that, under the Deed of Agreement, <strong>NSW</strong> Police makes the decision<br />
about whether to destroy forensic material, although the material itself is stored at DAL. 1227 We note that regardless of<br />
the Deed of Agreement, <strong>NSW</strong> Police and DAL still have to comply with their legislative obligations. This is complicated<br />
by the fact that the <strong>Act</strong> does not specify who the “responsible person” is, so the functions and responsibilities of the<br />
responsible person are shared between the Commissioner of Police and Chief Executive Officers of Western Sydney<br />
Area Health Service and DAL.<br />
DAL has requested that this issue be clarified by the working group run by the Criminal Law Review Division of<br />
the Attorney General’s Department, which was formed in response to the Findlay review of the <strong>Act</strong>. As we noted<br />
previously at 4.4, in our view, there should be no question as to who is the ‘responsible person’. This should be made<br />
very clear in relevant legislation and administrative arrangements. We have recommended that this occur as a matter<br />
of priority (see recommendation 9).<br />
14.2. Destroying forensic DNA material<br />
The <strong>Act</strong> provides that a person destroys forensic material, the analysis results or other information obtained through<br />
the forensic procedure (including information on the DNA database) if the person “destroys any means of identifying<br />
the forensic material or information with the person from whom it was taken or to whom it relates.” 1228 Identifying<br />
information means any information that could be used to discover the identity of the person who provided the sample,<br />
or to get information about an identifiable person. 1229 In this way, the <strong>Act</strong> requires de-identification of information and<br />
material obtained through forensic procedures, rather than physical destruction of the actual biological material.<br />
At no point does the <strong>Act</strong> specify that forensic material itself needs to be destroyed. 1230<br />
14.2.1. When should forensic DNA material be destroyed<br />
14.2.1.1. Volunteers<br />
The <strong>Act</strong> does not specifically provide for the destruction of forensic material taken from volunteers. However, it does<br />
provide that any identifying information (that is, information which could be used to discover the identity of the person<br />
who provided the DNA sample) relating to a volunteer must be removed from the database as soon as practicable<br />
after the agreed retention period ends. 1231 Rather than specify a period for which information about volunteers can<br />
be retained, the <strong>Act</strong> provides that it can be retained for such period as the volunteer and the Commissioner of Police<br />
agree. 1232 As happens with DNA samples taken from suspects, DAL only destroys volunteer samples with the express<br />
permission of FPIT.<br />
260<br />
<strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Ombudsman</strong><br />
DNA sampling and other forensic procedures conducted on suspects and volunteers under the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2000</strong>