15.01.2015 Views

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000 - NSW Ombudsman - NSW ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Recommendation 100<br />

The Attorney General implement a system to ensure that magistrates notify the responsible person of any<br />

extension given under section 88, as required by the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2000</strong>.<br />

<strong>NSW</strong> Police supports this recommendation. 1280 The Attorney General’s Department advised it will endeavour to use<br />

CourtLink, or other appropriate means, to ensure magistrates comply with their obligation to notify the responsible<br />

person of extensions. It also commented that:<br />

The obligation to ensure destruction of samples under the <strong>Act</strong> generally falls upon police officers and there<br />

appear to be few additional policy considerations raised by applications for extension of the 12 month<br />

destruction period. Therefore, consideration might be given to amending section 88(8) of the <strong>Act</strong> to require that<br />

the applicant under section 88(5), not the Magistrate, has the obligation to inform the person in charge of the<br />

DNA database of any extension granted. 1281<br />

14.2.12. Retention orders<br />

Section 81 of the <strong>Act</strong> provides that police or the DPP may apply for an order that forensic material taken from a<br />

volunteer be retained after the volunteer withdraws consent to its retention. These orders are available only in very<br />

limited circumstances – where police are investigating a serious offence, and material reasonably believed to be from<br />

the offender has been found at the crime scene, on the victim, on the volunteer, or on an object or person reasonably<br />

believed to have been associated with the commission of the offence. There must be reasonable grounds to believe<br />

that information obtained from analysis of the forensic material is likely to produce evidence of probative value, and<br />

retention of the forensic material taken from the volunteer must be justified in all the circumstances. The order may<br />

specify the period for which the forensic material may be retained.<br />

Section 81 as currently drafted is very confusing. The legislative heading reads, “Retention of forensic material by<br />

order of a magistrate after parent or guardian of child or incapable person withdraws consent.” However, there is<br />

no reference in the section to the withdrawal of consent by a parent or guardian, it simply refers to “a volunteer<br />

who withdraws consent.” While the heading suggests that the retention orders are available only where a parent or<br />

guardian withdraws consent, the text of section 81 could apply to any volunteer who withdraws consent, including, for<br />

example, an adult volunteer who has subsequently become a suspect, who wishes his or her forensic material to be<br />

destroyed. We also note that section 80 provides specifically for circumstances where a parent or guardian refuses or<br />

withdraws consent.<br />

Under the Interpretation <strong>Act</strong> 1987, the heading of a provision does not form part of the <strong>Act</strong>, but it may be considered<br />

to help determine the meaning of the provision if the provision is ambiguous, or if the ordinary meaning conveyed<br />

by the text of the provision leads to a manifestly absurd or unreasonable result. 1282 In this case, the text of section 81<br />

is neither ambiguous nor absurd – it simply does not accord with the heading of the provision. In addition, it makes<br />

sense that section 81 does apply to all volunteers, and on one reading the heading appears to be a drafting error.<br />

We are not aware of any applications for retention orders under section 81, and cannot comment any further on the<br />

issue. However, we expect it would be difficult for all involved – applicants, volunteers and magistrates – to determine<br />

whether the provision applies to all volunteers who withdraw consent, or only to volunteers whose parent or guardian<br />

has withdrawn consent. We recommend this be clarified.<br />

Recommendation 101<br />

That section 81 of the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2000</strong> be clarified to make clear its application to<br />

volunteers including whether it only applies to volunteers whose parent or guardian has withdrawn consent.<br />

The Attorney General’s Department commented that the recommendation appears sensible, as the policy behind<br />

section 81 as currently drafted is not clear. 1283 <strong>NSW</strong> Police also supports the recommendation. 1284<br />

<strong>NSW</strong> <strong>Ombudsman</strong><br />

DNA sampling and other forensic procedures conducted on suspects and volunteers under the <strong>Crimes</strong> (<strong>Forensic</strong> <strong>Procedures</strong>) <strong>Act</strong> <strong>2000</strong> 269

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!