15.01.2015 Views

The Power of Persistence: Education System ... - EQUIP123.net

The Power of Persistence: Education System ... - EQUIP123.net

The Power of Persistence: Education System ... - EQUIP123.net

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

accountability and corruption led donors to conduct an audit, the results <strong>of</strong><br />

which ‘were pathetic.’ After an initial effort at a full SWAp in the mid-1990s, the<br />

Ministry and donors negotiated and developed the Basic <strong>Education</strong> sub-Sector<br />

Investment Program (BESSIP).<br />

<strong>The</strong> BESSIP goal <strong>of</strong> improving primary access and learning outcomes for all<br />

children was supported by activities increasing inputs (teachers, classrooms,<br />

resources to government and community schools); donor conditionalities<br />

influencing change in resource-allocation and decentralization policies, activities<br />

strengthening <strong>of</strong> Ministry systems and capacities and the development <strong>of</strong><br />

platforms for dialogue between donors and MOE. BESSIP marked a transition in<br />

external support—from a preponderantly projectized environment to hybridized<br />

environment where donor development partners financial and technical support<br />

were guided by the SWAp. Under BESSIP, donor agencies provided technical<br />

assistance, resources, and projectized support to EMIS, decentralization,<br />

community schools, literacy and testing, infrastructure and school materials,<br />

and teacher pr<strong>of</strong>essional development.<br />

To allay donor fears <strong>of</strong> corruption and weak MOE accounting and management<br />

systems, BESSIP was implemented through a Program Implementation Unit<br />

(PIU), which operated parallel to the MOE. Donor interest in supporting<br />

community schools and concern <strong>of</strong> MOEST capacity, led them to create the<br />

Zambia Community Schools Secretariat, an advocacy body for community<br />

schools, in 1997. A study funded by UNICEF, (Cashen, 2001) reflects the tone<br />

<strong>of</strong> donor engagement with MOEST during the BESSIP era.<br />

Community initiatives to provide children with a basic education emerged in<br />

response to the [poor] state <strong>of</strong> government-run primary education. In the face <strong>of</strong> the<br />

government’s declining capacity to educate all <strong>of</strong> Zambia’s children, the government<br />

<strong>of</strong> Zambia has begun to recognize the importance <strong>of</strong> community schools<br />

(Cashen, 2001).<br />

<strong>The</strong> MOESP and FNDP focus on the entire sector, highlight areas for institutional<br />

and systems development and Ministry leadership in policy and planning cycles<br />

(as opposed to prioritizing direct service delivery and inputs). MOESP and FNDP<br />

emphasis on Ministry priorities and leadership reflect the change in the donor<br />

environment (including the departure <strong>of</strong> the World Bank as a driving force in the<br />

sector, the trend toward harmonization and country ownership, and away from<br />

conditionalities), the transition <strong>of</strong> the presidency in 2002 to Levy Mwanawasa<br />

(and subsequently reduced donor fears <strong>of</strong> corruption), and Zambia’s economic<br />

recovery which started in 2003.<br />

114<br />

SECTION 2: lESSONS fROM COUNTRY CASE STUdIES

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!